On 5/9/24 10:25, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 15:32 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
I'll just repeat from the second thread so the issue is more clear:
Both 2.3 and 2.4 produce from UG
\item
[{\ensuremath{\lceil}\textsf{Outer}\ensuremath{\rfloor}\textsf{~and~}
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 15:32 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> I'll just repeat from the second thread so the issue is more clear:
> Both 2.3 and 2.4 produce from UG
> \item
> [{\ensuremath{\lceil}\textsf{Outer}\ensuremath{\rfloor}\textsf{~and~}
>
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:18:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/05/2024 ?? 12:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
> >Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 09:03 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> >>Maybe Jürgen knows how feasible is backporting the cprotect work.
> >
> >Definitely too much
Le 9 mai 2024 13:17:26 José Matos a écrit :
On Thu, 2024-05-09 at 12:18 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is not a new bug in 2.3.8, right?
In some sense the lyx2lyx bug is a new bug (since we backported 2.4
format support), though. Shall we do something about it?
JMarc
The
On Thu, 2024-05-09 at 12:18 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is not a new bug in 2.3.8, right?
>
> In some sense the lyx2lyx bug is a new bug (since we backported 2.4
> format support), though. Shall we do something about it?
>
> JMarc
The problem is the backwards conversion
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 12:18 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> Le 09/05/2024 à 12:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 09:03 +0200 schrieb Enrico
> > Forestieri:
> > > Maybe Jürgen knows how feasible is backporting the cprotect work.
> >
> >
Le 9 mai 2024 12:18:19 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 09/05/2024 à 12:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 09:03 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
Maybe Jürgen knows how feasible is backporting the cprotect work.
Definitely too much work.
This is not a
Le 09/05/2024 à 12:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 09:03 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
Maybe Jürgen knows how feasible is backporting the cprotect work.
Definitely too much work.
This is not a new bug in 2.3.8, right?
In some sense the lyx2lyx bug is a
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.05.2024 um 09:03 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Maybe Jürgen knows how feasible is backporting the cprotect work.
Definitely too much work.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:56:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>In fact, there are two different issues when importing 2.4.x UserGuide in
>2.3.8:
>- a set of
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 04:41:42PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 5/8/24 13:56, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
In fact, there are two different issues when importing 2.4.x
UserGuide in 2.3.8:
- a set of unavailable Unicode
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:56:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> >In fact, there are two different issues when importing 2.4.x UserGuide in
> >2.3.8:
> >- a set of unavailable Unicode characters (CJK brackets and
On 5/8/24 13:56, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
In fact, there are two different issues when importing 2.4.x
UserGuide in 2.3.8:
- a set of unavailable Unicode characters (CJK brackets and
guillemets, codes
U+300{ABCDEF}),
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
In fact, there are two different issues when importing 2.4.x UserGuide
in 2.3.8:
- a set of unavailable Unicode characters (CJK brackets and guillemets, codes
U+300{ABCDEF}), section 3.9.4.2);
These errors disappear when
Le 07/05/2024 à 09:41, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:49:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
PS The only difference from the previous tarballs is removal of an old
remark about Python on OSX from ANNOUNCE.
Riki, please double check on the error spotted by Jean-Pierre
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:49:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> PS The only difference from the previous tarballs is removal of an old
> remark about Python on OSX from ANNOUNCE.
Riki, please double check on the error spotted by Jean-Pierre before releasing.
I am too busy this week, to
PS The only difference from the previous tarballs is removal of an old
remark about Python on OSX from ANNOUNCE.
On 5/6/24 21:40, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please prepare binaries.
When that is done, we'll move to the 2.4.0 release!
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please prepare binaries.
When that is done, we'll move to the 2.4.0 release!
Riki
--
Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
Pronouns: they/them/their
Website:
18 matches
Mail list logo
