I tried to update a bit README for 1.3.x. The result is committed now,
and attached fr your reading pleasure.
JMarc
What is LyX?
LyX is an advanced open-source document processor. Unlike
standard word processors, LyX encourages writing based on the
structure of your
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I tried to update a bit README for 1.3.x. The result is committed
now, and attached fr your reading pleasure.
Some tiny tweaks.
--
Angus--- README_orig Tue Sep 28 16:20:59 2004
+++ README Tue Sep 28 16:30:52 2004
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
What is LyX?
- LyX is an
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I tried to update a bit README for 1.3.x. The result is committed
now, and attached fr your reading pleasure.
Angus Some tiny tweaks.
Thanks. I merged your patch with what I already did.
JMarc
I tried to update a bit README for 1.3.x. The result is committed now,
and attached fr your reading pleasure.
JMarc
What is LyX?
LyX is an advanced open-source "document processor". Unlike
standard word processors, LyX encourages writing based on the
structure of your
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I tried to update a bit README for 1.3.x. The result is committed
> now, and attached fr your reading pleasure.
Some tiny tweaks.
--
Angus--- README_orig Tue Sep 28 16:20:59 2004
+++ README Tue Sep 28 16:30:52 2004
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
What is LyX?
- LyX is an
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I tried to update a bit README for 1.3.x. The result is committed
>> now, and attached fr your reading pleasure.
Angus> Some tiny tweaks.
Thanks. I merged your patch with what I already did.
JMarc
Specifically, the section:
Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
I note that i18n stuff has been going in since 1.3.0 was released but the
README hasn't been changed in 19 months.
--
Angus
On pitek 24 wrzesie 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
Specifically, the section:
Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
At least Polish language support works :)
Cheers, Kuba
Kuba Ober wrote:
On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
Specifically, the section:
Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
At least Polish language support works :)
Which bits? (There are three different targets). Could you post a patch?
--
On pitek 24 wrzesie 2004 09:04 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
Kuba Ober wrote:
On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
Specifically, the section:
Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
At least Polish language support works :)
Which bits? (There
Kuba Ober wrote:
On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 09:04 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
Kuba Ober wrote:
On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
Specifically, the section:
Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
At least Polish language support works :)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:10:53AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
At least Polish language support works :)
Which bits? (There are three different targets). Could you post a patch?
Well, I can definitely set my document language to Polish, and it accepts
polish characters, and encodes them
So to return to my original question, which bit of the following is
incorrect?
No bit is incorrect. Really. For a change :)
Both passages seem to be correct. Why is it that people insist on assuming
that things don't work (or are wrong), when in fact -- they are correct and
do work :) Feel
Specifically, the section:
Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
I note that i18n stuff has been going in since 1.3.0 was released but the
README hasn't been changed in 19 months.
--
Angus
On piÄtek 24 wrzesieÅ 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Specifically, the section:
>
> Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
At least Polish language support works :)
Cheers, Kuba
Kuba Ober wrote:
> On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Specifically, the section:
>>
>> Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
>
> At least Polish language support works :)
Which bits? (There are three different targets). Could you post a patch?
On piÄtek 24 wrzesieÅ 2004 09:04 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Kuba Ober wrote:
> > On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Specifically, the section:
> >>
> >> Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
> >
> > At least Polish language support works :)
>
>
Kuba Ober wrote:
> On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 09:04 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Kuba Ober wrote:
>> > On pi?tek 24 wrzesie? 2004 06:20 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> >> Specifically, the section:
>> >>
>> >> Does LyX have support for non-English speakers/writers/readers?
>> >
>> > At least Polish
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:10:53AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > > At least Polish language support works :)
> >
> > Which bits? (There are three different targets). Could you post a patch?
>
> Well, I can definitely set my document language to Polish, and it accepts
> polish characters, and
> So to return to my original question, which bit of the following is
> incorrect?
No bit is incorrect. Really. For a change :)
Both passages seem to be correct. Why is it that people insist on assuming
that things don't work (or are wrong), when in fact -- they are correct and
do work :) Feel
20 matches
Mail list logo
