Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Bo Peng schrieb:
| On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi,
|
| we use the term Listing inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
| the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
|
| I suggest using
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bo Peng schrieb:
| > On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >> Hi,
| >>
| >> we use the term "Listing" inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
| >> the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
| >>
| >>
Hi,
we use the term Listing inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
I suggest using Listing (without plural s), even though the package
is called Listings. Otherwise, we may confuse the users and translators.
If you agree, I will prepare a
On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
we use the term Listing inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
I suggest using Listing (without plural s), even though the package
is called Listings. Otherwise, we may confuse the users
Bo Peng schrieb:
On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
we use the term Listing inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
I suggest using Listing (without plural s), even though the package
is called Listings. Otherwise, we may
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 21:47:09 Michael Gerz wrote:
How about the following patch? OK to commit?
OK.
Michael
--
José Abílio
Well, there are many cases where we use the plural form.
You are right. Thanks.
How about the following patch? OK to commit?
+1.
Bo
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Bo Peng schrieb:
| On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi,
|
| we use the term Listing inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
| the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
|
| I suggest using Listing (without plural s), even
Hi,
we use the term "Listing" inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
I suggest using "Listing" (without plural "s"), even though the package
is called "Listings". Otherwise, we may confuse the users and translators.
If you agree, I will
On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
we use the term "Listing" inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
I suggest using "Listing" (without plural "s"), even though the package
is called "Listings". Otherwise, we may confuse
Bo Peng schrieb:
On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
we use the term "Listing" inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
I suggest using "Listing" (without plural "s"), even though the package
is called "Listings".
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 21:47:09 Michael Gerz wrote:
> How about the following patch? OK to commit?
OK.
> Michael
--
José Abílio
Well, there are many cases where we use the plural form.
You are right. Thanks.
How about the following patch? OK to commit?
+1.
Bo
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bo Peng schrieb:
| > On 5/29/07, Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >> Hi,
| >>
| >> we use the term "Listing" inconsistently at the moment. Sometimes we use
| >> the singular form, sometimes we use plural.
| >>
| >> I suggest using "Listing"
14 matches
Mail list logo