Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Michael Gerz wrote:
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| |
| | IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| | a case by case basis. And if
Helge Hafting wrote:
I am working slowly on them help would be appreciated.
I can look at it, like I did for 1.3. It should be simpler now, with
only one frontend.
Should I start with the nb.po that is in lyx1.5svn right now, or
should I wait
for some merge from 1.4?
I already merged
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Michael Gerz wrote:
| > | > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | >
| > | >> IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| > | >> a case by case
Helge Hafting wrote:
I am working slowly on them help would be appreciated.
I can look at it, like I did for 1.3. It should be simpler now, with
only one frontend.
Should I start with the nb.po that is in lyx1.5svn right now, or
should I wait
for some merge from 1.4?
I already merged
Michael Gerz wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
Lars, I am a careful man :-)
Right now, I am checking the
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Michael Gerz wrote:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
| NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
|
|
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Michael Gerz wrote:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
| NB f.ex.), msgmerge can
Michael Gerz wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
Lars, I am a careful man :-)
Right now, I am checking the
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Michael Gerz wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| >> IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| >> a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
| >> NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Michael Gerz wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| >> IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| >> a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
| >> NB f.ex.),
Jean-Marc,
I would like to do some translation work in the trunk and I guess others
would like to start as well.
Should we merge the 1.4.X translations with the trunk now or would you
like to wait a little bit longer?
I think we shouldn't wait until 1.4.4 is released even if that means
Michael == Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Jean-Marc, I would like to do some translation work in the
Michael trunk and I guess others would like to start as well.
Michael Should we merge the 1.4.X translations with the trunk now or
Michael would you like to wait a little bit
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Jean-Marc,
|
| I would like to do some translation work in the trunk and I guess
| others would like to start as well.
|
| Should we merge the 1.4.X translations with the trunk now or would you
| like to wait a little bit longer?
IMHO we should not
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
Lars, I am a careful man :-)
Right now, I am checking the state of the 1.4 and
Jean-Marc,
I would like to do some translation work in the trunk and I guess others
would like to start as well.
Should we merge the 1.4.X translations with the trunk now or would you
like to wait a little bit longer?
I think we shouldn't wait until 1.4.4 is released even if that means
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Jean-Marc, I would like to do some translation work in the
Michael> trunk and I guess others would like to start as well.
Michael> Should we merge the 1.4.X translations with the trunk now or
Michael> would you like to wait a
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc,
|
| I would like to do some translation work in the trunk and I guess
| others would like to start as well.
|
| Should we merge the 1.4.X translations with the trunk now or would you
| like to wait a little bit longer?
IMHO we should not
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
Lars, I am a careful man :-)
Right now, I am checking the state of the 1.4 and
18 matches
Mail list logo
