Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-09-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
Kornel Benko wrote: > We may want to unify the output of msgmerge to possibly minimize the > differences in po-files. We tried and were not capable to unify it on Uwe's box, I am not going into the same debate again so it's completely your call. P

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-09-04 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 4. September 2017 um 02:28:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:11:55PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda > > > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-09-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:11:55PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs:

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-09-03 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: > > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | g

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-09-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: > > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | git

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-31 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | git > > cat-file --batch-check |acut -f 3|asum > > 45175575 > > 45MB for

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-30 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 04:48:36PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > b) git archive become easily huge just because of such changes > > > > Do frequent commits of .gmo files significantly increase git archive? > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likel

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-30 Thread Richard Heck
On 08/30/2017 04:32 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:08:52PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings >>> were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations. >>> Then the

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-30 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > b) git archive become easily huge just because of such changes > > Do frequent commits of .gmo files significantly increase git archive? I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: $ git dif

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-30 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:08:52PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings > > were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations. > > Then the translator returns the po file, and the po and th

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-29 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 > > > Ubuntu 'lyx2.3pre' packages are now available on the Development PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily The packages install inde

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-28 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings > were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations. > Then the translator returns the po file, and the po and the > corresponding gmo files are committed. What is the purpose of rem

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-28 Thread Richard Heck
On 08/28/2017 01:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 03:23:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 >> Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when >> releasing tarballs? >> (If not, can you sha

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 03:23:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 > > Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when releasing > tarballs? > (If not, can you share it there?) I just updated the wiki with the ba

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-26 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when releasing tarballs? (If not, can you share it there?) It seems strings were not properly remerged for beta. Pavel

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Miscellaneous, I would say. > > I added it. Thanks, Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-24 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > > On 17/08/2017 2

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-23 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > An overview of the new features can be

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > An overview of the new features can be found here: > > > > > >http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23 > > > >

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > An overview of the new features can be found here: > > > >http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23 > > AFAICR, the new shell-escape [+minted] support made it to the 2.3, but it's >

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-17 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: An overview of the new features can be found here: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23 AFAICR, the new shell-escape [+minted] support made it to the 2.3, but it's not mentioned (yet). T.

LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

2017-08-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 We are proud to announce the first public beta of the new LyX 2.3 series. This pre-release is meant for testing and should not be used for serious work. For curious users who would like to test in order to help catch