On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> A double-open bug was reproted, you claim that the patch you checked
> in should fix this, and I wonder it got fixed for the original
> reporter as well.
Apologies for the confusion. I hoped the "btw...@ would indicate my
amb
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I fail to see the double open bug? What bugs are you refering too?
>| If you mean that there is another bug open which tells us that we're
>| only opening the tabular-layout if we click on a insetUrl in another
>| cell then this is a different matter
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| ??? I don't understand what you mean here.
>>
>> A double-open bug was reproted, you claim that the patch you checked
>> in should fix this, and I wonder it got fixed for the original
>> reporter as well.
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| ??? I don't understand what you mean here.
>
> A double-open bug was reproted, you claim that the patch you checked
> in should fix this, and I wonder it got fixed for the original
> reporter as well.
I fail to see the double open bug? What bugs are
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> And that also helped the bug-reporters?
>
| ??? I don't understand what you mean here.
A double-open bug was reproted, you claim that the patch you checked
in should fix this, and I wonder it got fixed for
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And that also helped the bug-reporters?
??? I don't understand what you mean here.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fa
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>| On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>>
This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
for non highl
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>
>>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>>> for non highly editable insets.
>>
>| Yes, works for me.
>>
>|
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>> for non highly editable insets.
>
| Yes, works for me.
>
| btw, the two-dialogs on right click bug is back *again*
On 11-May-2002 John Levon wrote:
>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>> for non highly editable insets.
>
> Yes, works for me.
>
> btw, the two-dialogs on right click bug is back *again* :(
???
Where?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
> for non highly editable insets.
Yes, works for me.
btw, the two-dialogs on right click bug is back *again* :(
john
--
"So what you're saying is "screw th
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On 09-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>>> for non highly editable insets.
>>
>| This is a "real" bugfix! Comments please!
>
> I bel
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 09-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>> for non highly editable insets.
>
| This is a "real" bugfix! Comments please!
I belive it is correct, but could you get someone to test it
On 09-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
> for non highly editable insets.
This is a "real" bugfix! Comments please!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
14 matches
Mail list logo