RE: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-28 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 28-Feb-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote: > Well I now get a segfault every time I load the UserGuide! Not a real > improvement. And why didn't you wait for Friday to commit this one? Sorry you should have sent this tomorrow it was obviously a problem with MY three, so now today you have to add smili

RE: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-28 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 28-Feb-2002 lasgouttes wrote: > Log message: > "ding-dong, the witch is dead!", says John Well I now get a segfault every time I load the UserGuide! Not a real improvement. And why didn't you wait for Friday to commit this one? Jug -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 12:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Wednesday 20 February 2002 11:25 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> | On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> CVSROOT:/usr/local/lyx/cvsro

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 11:25 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot > >> Module name: lyx-devel > >> Repository:lyx-devel/src/frontends/ > >> Changes by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot > Module name: lyx-devel > Repository: lyx-devel/src/frontends/ > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/19 20:45:53 > > Modified files: > lyx-devel/src/frontends/: Makefile.am > >

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-16 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 05:12:26PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > - qt2 and gnome should not depend on the live xforms code, but rather > take a snapshot to be kept in their own dirs. what do you mean ? cvs add ? /bin/cp ? regards john -- "I'd rather be rudely informed than politely le

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel - compile error

2002-02-16 Thread Herbert Voss
Herbert Voss wrote: > [...]make all-recursive > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/voss/lyx-devel.orig/src' > Making all in mathed > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/voss/lyx-devel.orig/src/mathed' > cd ../.. && automake --foreign src/mathed/Makefile > automake: src/mathed/Makefile.am: `libmat

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel - compile error

2002-02-16 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot > Module name: lyx-devel > Repository: lyx-devel/src/support/ > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/16 16:59:55 After cvs update: --- Configuration Host type: i686-pc-linux-gn

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:56:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andre> wrote: >> Log message: make inset-toggle work when cursor is inside inset Andre> Thanks. Andre> Now the redraw problem really shines ;-} I have to admit that I d

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:56:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log message: > make inset-toggle work when cursor is inside inset Thanks. Now the redraw problem really shines ;-} Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > basic support for \xymatrix > > what's this?? Don't know. Ask Jules. >From mathed's technical point of view it is an array ;-) Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 Feb 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, > > > Herbert> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" > > Herbert> will be mislea

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:44:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > basic support for \xymatrix I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. Missing environments: flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat Some missing commands: \intertext \hdotsfor \ddd

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log message: > basic support for \xymatrix what's this?? Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Minor thought: why are you using static_cast(val_) instead Angus> of int(val_) since val_ is a double? Because Lars prefers that, I think. JMarc

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 04 February 2002 4:06 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, > > > Herbert> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" > >

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Herbert Voss
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This means that we do not have anything which does % of \textwidth! > (\paperwidth was \pagewidth before, which does not exist). > > I think that PW, which is I think related to "%" should have a > case PW: > buffer << abs(static_cast(val_/100)) <<

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Herbert> always c%, because there are only some few cases Herbert> where p% makes sense, from my point as a lyx-user. The only Herbert> unit, which makes sense in different to c% is t(extwidth)%, Herbert> when in twocolumnmode. Before r

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, Herbert> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" Herbert> will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we better Herbert> delet

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Herbert Voss wrote: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, >>> >>it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" >> >>will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we >>better delete this one? Otherwise w

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 04 February 2002 3:51 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Herbert Voss wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, > > > > it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" > > > > will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we >

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 04 February 2002 3:42 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, > > > it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" > will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we > better delete this one? Otherwise

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Herbert Voss wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, > > it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" > > will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we > better delete this one? Otherwise we always have the > questions: 100% of w

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-02-04 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString, it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%" will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we better delete this one? Otherwise we always have the questions: 100% of what? Herbert -- http://ww

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-30 Thread Herbert Voss
it would be nice if you can commit my patch from yesterday evening, too. Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-30 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: > > Hummm, what do we want this for ? > > viewing latex style files from the texinfo dialog? ah OK I thought it only got used for the short help files. My mistake. regards john -- "24-hour boredom I'm convicted instantly"

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-30 Thread Edwin Leuven
> Hummm, what do we want this for ? viewing latex style files from the texinfo dialog? > The Qt2 way is to use QWhatsThis. but this is like a big tooltip right? not so suitable for viewing large files though... you want it out? Just getting rid of xforms cruft, Ed.

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:24:01PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > >er, no it's not. it's a regression against old-figure. > > images were rotated on screen in which lyx-version for as long as I've used lyx, up to present CVS regards john -- "In no sense is [in]stability a reason to mov

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-29 Thread Herbert Voss
John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:12:48PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > >>>and rotation on screen. I'm not sure anyone cares about that though. >>> >>but this is a new feature. >> > > er, no it's not. it's a regression against old-figure. images were rotated on screen in wh

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:12:48PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > >and rotation on screen. I'm not sure anyone cares about that though. > > but this is a new feature. er, no it's not. it's a regression against old-figure. > Nice when there, but not important agreed regards john -- "In no se

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-29 Thread Herbert Voss
John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:01:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > >>On Tuesday 29 January 2002 10:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> >>>| Log message: >>>|Herbert's big graphics patch. >>> >>>So no the only missing part is async render

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:05:10AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/: QShowFile.C QShowFile.h Hummm, what do we want this for ? The Qt2 way is to use QWhatsThis. regards john -- "In no sense is [in]stability a reason to move to a new version. It's never a

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:01:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Tuesday 29 January 2002 10:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > | Log message: > > | Herbert's big graphics patch. > > > > So no the only missing part is async rendering? > > That and being

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Can someone show me the code that fails? Lars> A small example please, not the code from LyX. I'm not sure Angus has found the exact case. JMarc

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Got it! The bug lies in the position counters of ostringstream. Angus> basic_stringbuf actually. Sometimes they ain't being set Angus> correctly. Did you find out when? We have plenty of uses of this stream which seem to work with

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 18 January 2002 4:29 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Where do you want me to add the std::flush? > >> Because I know it exists and because it

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus> Where do you want me to add the std::flush? >> Because I know it exists and because it may magically repair some >> broken insternal thing. I don't know really.

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Where do you want me to add the std::flush? > > Because I know it exists and because it may magically repair some > broken insternal thing. I don't know really. That was "where" not "why". But I'll try. > Angus> Why does t

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 3:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Angus> That's ostringstream and std::string of course. >> I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 18 January 2002 3:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> That's ostringstream and std::string of course. > > I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to a wrong assert in its > string implementation. > > Angus> I have

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> That's ostringstream and std::string of course. I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to a wrong assert in its string implementation. Angus> I have no idea what's going wrong. This little program works Angus> fine! A But then

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 18 January 2002 2:18 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Try to take a look at LaTeXFeatures::getTClassPreamble(). It uses a > >> vector of bool (whic

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Try to take a look at LaTeXFeatures::getTClassPreamble(). It uses a >> vector of bool (which should be safe) and stringstreams. I seem to >> remember I have seen ca

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Try to take a look at LaTeXFeatures::getTClassPreamble(). It uses a > vector of bool (which should be safe) and stringstreams. I seem to > remember I have seen cases where cxx stringstream did not behave as > gnu version, but this i

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, you wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Angus> wrote: > >> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:2

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Angus> wrote: >> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dekel> wrote: >> >> Tidy up t

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-18 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dekel> wrote: > >> Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the > >> lyxcode de

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dekel> wrote: >> Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the >> lyxcode definition in the preamble but is otherwise Ok I think. Dekel> It does work fo

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-16 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus, I have three more insets in my own cvs, but they make some problems after your changes. What have I to do that it will compile again. Here the error messages for the first inset, the other two have the same. HErbert In file included from Dialogs.C:20: ../../../src/frontends/controllers/G

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the lyxcode > definition in the preamble but is otherwise Ok I think. It does work for me. Can you trace the problem ? Does anyone else have this proble

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-13 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 05:41:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > LyXFunc::getStatus was using setErrorMessage (meaning it set an error > even if we were not trying to dispatch). I added a > LyXFunc::setStatusMessage method instead, and if a lfun is disabled, > ::dispatch sets the error

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John Levon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:07:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> fix problem with nroff detection, remove dead code with old floats, >> bogus message when closing last buffer, toolbar status when changing >> > ^^^%^^

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-13 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:07:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > fix problem with nroff detection, remove dead code with old floats, > bogus message when closing last buffer, toolbar status when changing ^^^%^^ how did you fix this out of i

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-12 Thread Allan Rae
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log message: > finished fixing removeAutoInsets() There is one small quirk with this fix. If you have a document like the attached and: View->DVI Dismiss the dialog View->DVI The Alert dialog appears but the

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-09 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:40:04PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > I thought I had fixed this already ? What changes did you make ? > > Well to see exactly what I did you can use cvsweb on insettext.C (I > just added an UpdateLocal(bv, CURSOR, false) in the right place. In ah, magic, ok. > For

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 08-Jan-2002 John Levon wrote: >> lyx-devel/src/: BufferView_pimpl.C >> lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/: FormParagraph.C >> lyx-devel/src/insets/: insettext.C >> >> Log message: >> Update the toolbar if we unlock an inset (or change paragraph). > > I thought I had fixe

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:32:11PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > lyx-devel/src/: BufferView_pimpl.C > lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/: FormParagraph.C > lyx-devel/src/insets/: insettext.C > > Log message: > Update the toolbar if we unlock an inset (or change paragr

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 04:33:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > If this is unsolvable from qt point of view, don't worry. But keep > that in mind for your other files. I know that most of the files that > I fixed a few weeks ago were from you. OK. john -- "Unless everyone else on eart

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:21:39PM +, John Levon wrote: >> > > BTW John, could you change the files in qt2/ so that >> is > > #include'd in the .C files and _not_ in the .h files? This >> is how it > > should be in all the sources.

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:21:39PM +, John Levon wrote: > > > BTW John, could you change the files in qt2/ so that is > > > #include'd in the .C files and _not_ in the .h files? This is how it > > > should be in all the sources. > > > > how do I mention string in a header then ? > > oh, I

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:20:24PM +, John Levon wrote: > > BTW John, could you change the files in qt2/ so that is > > #include'd in the .C files and _not_ in the .h files? This is how it > > should be in all the sources. > > how do I mention string in a header then ? oh, I see. you want

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:12:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > BTW John, could you change the files in qt2/ so that is > #include'd in the .C files and _not_ in the .h files? This is how it > should be in all the sources. how do I mention string in a header then ? john -- "Unless e

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 06:44:52PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>superscript is superscript and ^ is ^ ... ;-) >> > > It's not exactly simple to have you people shut up... > > Try again. you should start always with the second try ... :-) it's ok now! Thanks Herbert

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 06:44:52PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > superscript is superscript and ^ is ^ ... ;-) It's not exactly simple to have you people shut up... Try again. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Herbert Voss wrote: > but where is the sense when I insert > > insert->special character->super/subscript > > and get ^+red rectangle (same for subscript)?? sorry: I meant a BLUE one inside the RED mathbox. Herbert

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Andre Poenitz wrote: 1. is it intended that I get ^ or _ when I hit the buttons >>this buttons ;-) >> > > Ah... well... yes, sort of. You get proper *scripts in mnath mode and ^ or > _ outside... but where is the sense when I insert insert->special character->super/subscript and get

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Ah... well... yes, sort of. You get proper *scripts in mnath mode and ^ or > _ outside... so this is strictly a bug isn't it ? john -- "Unless everyone else on earth is attending meetings I haven't been told about." - /.

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
> >>1. is it intended that I get ^ or _ when I hit the buttons > > this buttons ;-) Ah... well... yes, sort of. You get proper *scripts in mnath mode and ^ or _ outside... Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:37:54PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>1. is it intended that I get ^ or _ when I hit the buttons >> > > When hitting which buttons? Log message: super- and subscript buttons for the math panel this buttons ;-) Herbert -- http://www.

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:37:54PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > 1. is it intended that I get ^ or _ when I hit the buttons When hitting which buttons? Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2002-01-03 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Added files: > lyx-devel/images/: super.xpm sub.xpm > > Log message: > super- and subscript buttons for the math panel 1. is it intended that I get ^ or _ when I hit the buttons without creating a blue mathbox? Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/hel

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-28 Thread Herbert Voss
Herbert Voss wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> CVSROOT:/usr/local/lyx/cvsroot >> Module name:lyx-devel >> Repository:lyx-devel/src/insets/ >> Changes by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]01/12/28 14:26:55 > > got following error when compiling: sorry, forget to say, that it works with

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-28 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot > Module name: lyx-devel > Repository: lyx-devel/src/insets/ > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/12/28 14:26:55 got following error when compiling: ---snip--- lyxtextclass.C: In method `bool L

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Dec-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > cvs rdiff -D 'now' -D 'five minutes ago' > > Something like this should be allowed. Or use the very comfortable LyX-CVS web interface. Jug P.S.: Emacs has a vc interface with diff between revisions. You have to know the revision num

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 04:16:46AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > perhaps you should have a look at the change in math_parser, Andre Is there a possibility to get a diff between the state of the repository before and after a certain commit easily? 'cvs diff' seems to show only my own ch

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:27:20AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:06:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Modified files: > > lyx-devel/src/mathed/: ChangeLog math_support.C > > > > Log message: > > Fix handling of \mathfrak font. > > Out of pure curiosity:

RE: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 14-Dec-2001 jug wrote: > John's InsetTabular cursor patch and modifications/fixes to undo/redo code. > TODO: Still some problems in multiparagraph redo! And deleting of substituted > paragraphs when undoing/redoing. This fixes some major bugs in the undo/redo code regarding insets, but as to

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-13 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:06:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modified files: > lyx-devel/src/mathed/: ChangeLog math_support.C > > Log message: > Fix handling of \mathfrak font. Out of pure curiosity: what was broken and how does your patch fixed it? Andre' -- André Pönit

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-03 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:32:38AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > .C is fine with me. *.[Ch] as pattern for shell operation is _very_ > convienient. agreed. > > get rid of LyX prefix both on files and on classes. > > That would be my vote, too. And since I heared you mumbling something like > t

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-03 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 03-Dec-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > .C, .cc or .cxx works for me. Then I would say we leave it .C! Jug -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-03 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 03-Dec-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:12:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> IMHO: >> .C -> .cxx and > > .C is fine with me. *.[Ch] as pattern for shell operation is _very_ > convienient. I aggree with this, however .cpp is probably more standard the the .C nota

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:12:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > IMHO: > .C -> .cxx and .C is fine with me. *.[Ch] as pattern for shell operation is _very_ convienient. > get rid of LyX prefix both on files and on classes. That would be my vote, too. And since I heared you mumbling someth

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 12:47:06AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modified files: > lyx-devel/src/: Makefile.am figureForm.C vspace.C vspace.h > Added files: > lyx-devel/src/: lengthcommon.C lengthcommon.h lyxgluelength.C > lyxgluelength.h lyxlength.C lyxleng

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-12-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 06:03:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > test add a string operator *sigh* We have spoken. So be it. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-30 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 09:30:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > >> ... added freespacing for ERT Insets. does this mean the double space bug i n ERT on sourceforge can be closed ? > when pasting in multiple paragraphs (the added paragraphs don't get the > right Font setting! do you know

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-30 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 29-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:29:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> ... added freespacing for ERT Insets. > > This is really good news. The only thing remaining is that on freespacing the alignment of the paragraph should be ALWAYS 'left'-aligned and

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:29:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... added freespacing for ERT Insets. This is really good news. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-26 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 26-Nov-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> That is a _long_ time ago. one and a half year perhaps? > > So we don't care to report errors at the right place? I think we SHOULD care! The question is WHY has this behaviour

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> That is a _long_ time ago. one and a half year perhaps? So we don't care to report errors at the right place? JMarc

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I do not want to add code to workaround bugs which have been fixed >> two years ago (actually it got fixed because I reported it on >> behalf of a LyX user). Dekel> I will remove the code in both CVS and 1.1.6 branch. Thanks. Also, I se

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-26 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > That's what I had in mind. Isn't this the infamous twoside options bug > of geometry? It should have been fixed a long time ago. Geometry.dtx > says: > > % \changes{v2.2}{1999/10/07}{bug fixed: explicit twoside was needed % >

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:13:35AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel> wrote: dekel> Log message: Correct margins when using twoside and geometry >> What's this? I do not really like to see patches landing on the >> 1.1.6 branch witho

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-26 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:13:35AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > dekel> Log message: Correct margins when using twoside and geometry > > What's this? I do not really like to see patches landing on the 1.1.6 > branch without having ever been discussed or even applied to the > trunk. > > Co

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "dekel" == dekel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: dekel> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot Module name: lyx-devel dekel> Repository: lyx-devel/src/ Changes by: dekel> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/11/24 23:26:09 dekel> Modified files: ./: Tag: BRANCH_1_1_6 ChangeLog lyx-devel/src/: dekel> Tag: BRANCH_1_1

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-13 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > I mentioned this before - the return value needs to have two values, for whether > > it was dispatched, and what should happen after. > > > > I don't think anyone replied ? > > ??? Did you read all of the mail on this subject to

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-13 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 13-Nov-2001 John Levon wrote: > I mentioned this before - the return value needs to have two values, for whether > it was dispatched, and what should happen after. > > I don't think anyone replied ? ??? Did you read all of the mail on this subject today? Jug -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-.

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-13 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > But the 1.1.6 behavior was to add a space after the math inset, and this > doesn't happen now. > If we don't want a hackish solution (like the one that was in 1.1.6), then > we need to add new return codes, e.g. UNDISPATCHED_FINISHED_R

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-13 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 13-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 11:02:01AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: >> You call unlockInset(FINISHED_RIGHT) or unlockInset(FINISHED_LEFT) and >> then the BufferView::unlockInset(where) call has to see where the inset >> is in and how to handle RIGHT and LEFT! > >

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-13 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 11:02:01AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > You call unlockInset(FINISHED_RIGHT) or unlockInset(FINISHED_LEFT) and > then the BufferView::unlockInset(where) call has to see where the inset > is in and how to handle RIGHT and LEFT! Ok. Than this is fine. And this handles the "

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

2001-11-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:36:36AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 11:18:13AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > You will have to call to unlockInset() from the localDispatch() method of the > > inset. > > And have to take care of rtl-issues and the like? > This certainly does not

  1   2   3   >