Re: Compiling LyX 2.5 on macOS Sonoma

On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 07:28:59AM +0200, Christoph Schmitz wrote: > Hello, > > Attached is my config.log. The attachment looks corrupted. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Compiling LyX 2.5 on macOS Sonoma

Hello, Attached is my config.log. Chris <> > Am 21.06.2023 um 12:50 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 21/06/2023 à 12:36, Christoph Schmitz a écrit : >> Hello Scott, >> Yes, >> I deleted my local repository already a few times and started from scratch. > > Hello, > > Could you please

Re: Compiling LyX 2.5 on macOS Sonoma

Le 21/06/2023 à 12:36, Christoph Schmitz a écrit : Hello Scott, Yes, I deleted my local repository already a few times and started from scratch. Hello, Could you please send your config.log file? JMarc These are the commands I use: cd ~/chris/Git git clone git://git.lyx.org/lyx LyX

Re: Compiling LyX 2.5 on macOS Sonoma

Hello Scott, Yes, I deleted my local repository already a few times and started from scratch. These are the commands I use: cd ~/chris/Git git clone git://git.lyx.org/lyx LyX cd LyX ./autogen.sh ./configure \ --with-version-suffix=-2.4 \ --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr \

Re: Compiling LyX 2.5 on macOS Sonoma

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 07:45:09AM +0200, Christoph Schmitz wrote: > > I have been unable to compile LyX 2.4 on macOS Sonoma for the past few days. > The error message I am receiving is as follows: > > ... > Making all in qt > /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make all-am > make[6]:

Re: compiling LyX

Le 11/11/2021 à 19:00, john kennan a écrit : I don't know how to reply to messages on the list (I'm already subscribed) Hello John, What is the problem? That you answer to sender instead? What are you using for your emails? JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Re: compiling LyX

I don't know how to reply to messages on the list (I'm already subscribed) Edited the wiki (https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Git) to say that one must change to the lyx directory after the first couple of steps John On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:14 AM john kennan wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to be able

Re: compiling LyX

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:14:23AM -0600, john kennan wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to be able to compile LyX (on Mac OS Big Sur). > > I tried following the instructions on https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Git > Got as far as this: > > (base) jk@jkmac-3 ~ % git config --global user.name jkennan > (base)

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Peter Kümmel wrote: > For iconv and hunspell one can find some CMakeLists.txt at github, not > ready for MSVC but usable as starting point. AFAIk zlib already ships > with cmake files. > > Would it be an option to add tripped down iconv, hunspell and zlib sources > to lyx and to build them as

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Am 01.11.2015 um 22:02 schrieb Georg Baum: Peter Kümmel wrote: For iconv and hunspell one can find some CMakeLists.txt at github, not ready for MSVC but usable as starting point. AFAIk zlib already ships with cmake files. Would it be an option to add tripped down iconv, hunspell and zlib

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

on behalf of PhilipPirrip <p...@net.hr> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 8:16 PM To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions Hello! I'm trying to compile LyX for Windows: WinXP VirtualBox, Visual Studio 2010, Qt 5.5, all by the instructions i

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Op 31-10-2015 om 14:44 schreef PhilipPirrip: On 10/31/2015 09:27 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote: Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6 First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list recently. The errors

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Am 14.10.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Georg Baum: David Hyde wrote: I'm interested in looking into this at least a bit (may become deterred if some dependency nightmare occurs!). I've looked at the current MSVC dependencies that are in the archive on sourceforge. Which of these are things that

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

On 10/31/2015 09:27 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote: Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6 First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list recently. The errors reported in the message pane are of this kind

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6 First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list recently. On 10/31/2015 03:53 AM, David Hyde wrote: I experienced this error as well when setting up my LyX

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Hello! I'm trying to compile LyX for Windows: WinXP VirtualBox, Visual Studio 2010, Qt 5.5, all by the instructions in INSTALL.Win32 No matter what I do in CMake config, the compilation ends with the messages I give below, and I have no idea what's happening and how to fix it. 24> --

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Le 14/10/2015 07:27, David Hyde a écrit : Which of these are things that should actually be downloaded and compiled on the fly? For example, do you think that Python and ghostscript should be compiled from source, or do you think it suffices to just include up-to -date Windows binaries? Same

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

David Hyde wrote: > I'm interested in looking into this at least a bit (may become deterred > if some dependency nightmare occurs!). I've looked at the current MSVC > dependencies that are in the archive on sourceforge. Which of these > are things that should actually be downloaded and compiled

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Hi Georg, Thanks for your reply! > This is possible, but needs some work. > > The current MSVC build instructions use some pre-compiled third party > libraries. Of course these work only for exactly one MSVC version. > Therefore > I would propose the following procedure instead of just

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

David Hyde wrote: > Hi there, > > > I'm interested in compiling LyX on Windows. I've read through the > INSTALL.Win32 file and was able to get LyX to compile from source using > Visual C++ Express 2010, following the instructions in that file. Great! > I'm > wondering though, is it possible

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am 26.04.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Elmar Hinz t3el...@googlemail.com: On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz t3el...@googlemail.com Hello, IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am 26.04.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Elmar Hinz : > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz > > > Hello, > > > > IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a > >

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Hi, here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed via the QT installer package (not from source): cmake -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_DEBUG=ON

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed via the QT installer package (not from source): cmake -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_DEBUG=ON

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Summary: * QT 4.8.4 installed via the QT installer package (not from source) * brew install cmake * cmake -DLYX_NLS=OFF -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_DEBUG=ON -DLYX_EXTERNAL_LIBINTL=OFF . * make * make install Errors from cmake: CMake Error: Target LyX

Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 16:44:22, schrieb Elmar Hinz t3el...@googlemail.com here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed via the QT installer package (not from source): cmake

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

The second one seems to be cased by the first one. OK didn't follow the instruction: make LyX2.1 (to build the binary only) or make package (to get a mac bundle) Elmar -- Elmar Hinz Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1 33014 Bad Driburg TYPO3 community contact: t.3.e.l.m.a...@.g.m.a.i.l.dot.c.o.m

Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

or prefered: b.) Install the devel package for libc6 (on ubuntu libc6-dev) Elmar Kornel Hello, IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib - libSystem.B.dylib Elmar -- Elmar Hinz Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1 33014 Bad Driburg TYPO3 community contact:

Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz t3el...@googlemail.com Hello, IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib - libSystem.B.dylib Elmar Is there also a appropriate devel *package*? Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

OK didn't follow the instruction: make LyX2.1 (to build the binary only) or make package (to get a mac bundle) Anyway, That doesn't bring in the missing Info.plist. Question: Why is there no Info.plist in the source? -- Elmar Hinz Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1 33014 Bad Driburg TYPO3

Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: ** Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz t3el...@googlemail.com Hello, IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib - libSystem.B.dylib Elmar Is there

Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:31:11, schrieb Elmar Hinz t3el...@googlemail.com Anyway, That doesn't bring in the missing Info.plist. Question: Why is there no Info.plist in the source? There is. It should be created from Info.plist.in at configure time. That file itself is in the

Re: Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:46:17, schrieb Elmar Hinz t3el...@googlemail.com I find a _debug* and a _profile* variant: No, what you found are files, not packages. Check please to which package belongs a specified file. (I don't know how, sorry) Kornel signature.asc Description:

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Hi, here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed via the QT installer package (not from source): cmake -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_DEBUG=ON

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed via the QT installer package (not from source): > > cmake -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF > -DLYX_DEBUG=ON

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Summary: * QT 4.8.4 installed via the QT installer package (not from source) * brew install cmake * cmake -DLYX_NLS=OFF -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_DEBUG=ON -DLYX_EXTERNAL_LIBINTL=OFF . * make * make install Errors from cmake: CMake Error: Target LyX

Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 16:44:22, schrieb Elmar Hinz > here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build > directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed > via the QT installer package (not from source): > > > >

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

> The second one seems to be cased by the first one. > OK didn't follow the instruction: make LyX2.1 (to build the binary only) or make package (to get a mac bundle) Elmar -- Elmar Hinz Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1 33014 Bad Driburg TYPO3 community contact: t.3.e.l.m.a...@.g.m.a.i.l.dot.c.o.m

Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

> or prefered: > > b.) Install the devel package for libc6 (on ubuntu libc6-dev) > > > > > Elmar > > > > > Kornel > Hello, IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib -> libSystem.B.dylib Elmar -- Elmar Hinz Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1 33014 Bad Driburg TYPO3 community

Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz > Hello, > > IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a > > /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib -> libSystem.B.dylib > > Elmar > Is there also a appropriate devel *package*? Kornel signature.asc Description:

Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

> OK didn't follow the instruction: > make LyX2.1 (to build the binary only) > or > make package (to get a mac bundle) > Anyway, That doesn't bring in the missing Info.plist. Question: Why is there no Info.plist in the source? -- Elmar Hinz Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1 33014 Bad Driburg TYPO3

Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > ** > > Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz < > t3el...@googlemail.com> > > > Hello, > > > > > > IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a > > > > > > /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib -> libSystem.B.dylib > > >

Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:31:11, schrieb Elmar Hinz > > Anyway, That doesn't bring in the missing Info.plist. > > Question: Why is there no Info.plist in the source? There is. It should be created from Info.plist.in at configure time. That file itself is in the

Re: Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX on Mac OS 10.7.5

Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:46:17, schrieb Elmar Hinz > > I find a _debug* and a _profile* variant: No, what you found are files, not packages. Check please to which package belongs a specified file. (I don't know how, sorry) Kornel signature.asc

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21/11/2011 23:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. And we won't use Qt signals in the core as long as nobody makes the effort

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 22/11/2011 22:09, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 21/11/2011 23:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. And we won't use Qt signals in

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:02:15AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Systemcall.cpp:337:65: error: inconsistent user-defined literal suffixes ‘__FILE__’ and ‘QTOSTRING’ in string literal Systemcall.cpp:337:65: error: unable to find user-defined string literal operator ‘operator __FILE__’

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21/11/2011 23:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] > > Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. And we won't use Qt signals in the core as long as nobody makes the

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 22/11/2011 22:09, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 21/11/2011 23:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] > > Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. And we won't use Qt

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:02:15AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Systemcall.cpp:337:65: error: inconsistent user-defined literal suffixes > ‘__FILE__’ and ‘QTOSTRING’ in string literal > Systemcall.cpp:337:65: error: unable to find user-defined string literal > operator ‘operator""

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr. Systemcall.cpp: In constructor

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well... I'll wait half a year before repeating that test.

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr.

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 10:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well... I'll

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:44:04PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. Vincent

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. >> I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr. >> >> Systemcall.cpp: In constructor >>

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> This seems to be our own problem. >> Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. >> Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. >> >> Oh well... I'll wait half a year before repeating

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Peter Kümmel writes: > > | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > >> This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. > >> I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr.

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 10:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well...

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:44:04PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >>Peter Kümmel writes: > >> > >>| On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >>> >

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

> > And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] > > Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. Vincent

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well... I'll wait half a year before repeating that test. Hopefully a new version of Qt will have been

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr. Systemcall.cpp: In constructor ‘lyx::support::SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate(const string, const string)’: This seems to

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well... I'll wait half a year before repeating that test. Hopefully a new version of Qt will have been

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr. Systemcall.cpp: In constructor ‘lyx::support::SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate(const string&, const string&)’: This seems to

Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

Maybe you need ./configure --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local given that you have installed libiconv? All right, it's no bug, only my lack of knowledge. I've managed to install a whole lot of dependecies, then compile with gmake in about 15 minutes. I thought configure would

Re: Re: Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

> Maybe you need > > ./configure --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local > > given that you have installed libiconv? All right, it's no bug, only my lack of knowledge. I've managed to install a whole lot of dependecies, then compile with gmake in about 15 minutes. I thought configure

RE: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

I'm experimenting with PC-BSD, and looks like LyX 1.6.4 won't compile. [...] make: don't know how to make SignalSlotPrivate_moc.cpp. Stop Either do a make clean, autogen, autoconf or manually remove this file. The files *_moc.cpp are auto-generated (by qt) and were renamed to moc_*.cpp some

Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

rainel rai...@index.hu writes: Hello all! I'm experimenting with PC-BSD, and looks like LyX 1.6.4 won't compile. It's a PC-BSD 7.1.1, based on FreeBSD 7.2, 64 bit, running on a Core 2 Duo. Configure says everything's ok, then make errors out. Here are the last few lines of time make:

Re: Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

Which 'make' is that? Not GNU make, I guess. I'd be will to work on having our make infrastructure work in these case, but I do not know how difficult this is. Typically, for moc files we use rules like this one %_moc.cpp: %.h $(MOC4) -o $@ $ which creates foo.moc.cpp from foo.h.

Re: Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

docstream.cpp:19:19: error: iconv.h: No such file or directory Maybe you need ./configure --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local given that you have installed libiconv? Koji

RE: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

>I'm experimenting with PC-BSD, and looks like LyX 1.6.4 won't compile. > > [...] > >make: don't know how to make SignalSlotPrivate_moc.cpp. Stop > Either do a make clean, autogen, autoconf or manually remove this file. The files *_moc.cpp are auto-generated (by qt) and were renamed to

Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

"rainel" writes: > Hello all! > > I'm experimenting with PC-BSD, and looks like LyX 1.6.4 won't compile. It's a > PC-BSD 7.1.1, based on FreeBSD 7.2, 64 bit, running on a Core 2 Duo. > Configure says everything's ok, then make errors out. Here are the last few > lines of time

Re: Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

> Which 'make' is that? Not GNU make, I guess. I'd be will to work on > having our make infrastructure work in these case, but I do not know how > difficult this is. Typically, for moc files we use rules like this one > %_moc.cpp: %.h >$(MOC4) -o $@ $< > which creates foo.moc.cpp from

Re: Re: Compiling LyX under FreeBSD

> docstream.cpp:19:19: error: iconv.h: No such file or directory Maybe you need ./configure --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local given that you have installed libiconv? Koji

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:01:44 +0200 Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... (I.e., how does it look as total lines vs. unique lines)? I don't understand the question. Our ~500 lines .cpp files typically yield a ~5 lines compilation unit after the preprocessor expanded all #includes.

Re: compiling LyX

So bigger compilation units are better, right? Any tricks around this? Andre, do you have the ratio for monolithic builds? pavel

Re: compiling LyX

Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:01:44 +0200 Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... (I.e., how does it look as total lines vs. unique lines)? I don't understand the question. Our ~500 lines .cpp files typically yield a ~5 lines compilation unit after the

Re: compiling LyX

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:20:17AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:01:44 +0200 Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... (I.e., how does it look as total lines vs. unique lines)? I don't understand the question. Our ~500 lines .cpp files typically yield a

Re: compiling LyX

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:24:34AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: So bigger compilation units are better, right? Any tricks around this? Andre, do you have the ratio for monolithic builds? No. But I can create a few numbers manually... hang on. Revision 21692: non-monolithic Total:

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:01:44 +0200 Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > (I.e., how does it look as total lines vs. unique lines)? > > I don't understand the question. Our ~500 lines .cpp files typically > yield a ~5 lines compilation unit after the preprocessor expanded > all

Re: compiling LyX

> So bigger compilation units are better, right? Any tricks around this? Andre, do you have the ratio for monolithic builds? pavel

Re: compiling LyX

Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:01:44 +0200 Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... (I.e., how does it look as total lines vs. unique lines)? I don't understand the question. Our ~500 lines .cpp files typically yield a ~5 lines compilation unit after the

Re: compiling LyX

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:20:17AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:01:44 +0200 > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > > > (I.e., how does it look as total lines vs. unique lines)? > > > > I don't understand the question. Our ~500 lines .cpp files typically

Re: compiling LyX

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:24:34AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > So bigger compilation units are better, right? Any tricks around this? > > Andre, do you have the ratio for monolithic builds? No. But I can create a few numbers manually... hang on. Revision 21692: non-monolithic Total:

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:27:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then 100 when comparing total compiled lines of code vs our code: Total: compiled: 16378361 real: 164656 ratio: 99 We had about 24630737 lines half a year

Re: compiling LyX

Andre Poenitz wrote: Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then 100 when comparing total compiled lines of code vs our code: Total: compiled: 16378361 real: 164656 ratio: 99 We had about 24630737 lines half a year ago What was the ratio half a year ago? I

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:22:23PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:27:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then 100 when comparing total compiled lines of code vs our code: Total: compiled: 16378361

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:25:05PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then 100 when comparing total compiled lines of code vs our code: Total: compiled: 16378361 real: 164656 ratio: 99 We had about 24630737

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:27:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then > 100 when comparing "total compiled lines of code" vs "our code": > > Total: compiled: 16378361 real: 164656 ratio: 99 > > We had about 24630737 lines half

Re: compiling LyX

Andre Poenitz wrote: Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then 100 when comparing "total compiled lines of code" vs "our code": Total: compiled: 16378361 real: 164656 ratio: 99 We had about 24630737 lines half a year ago What was the ratio half a year ago?

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:22:23PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:27:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then > > 100 when comparing "total compiled lines of code" vs "our code": > > > > Total:

Re: compiling LyX

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:25:05PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> Just as a side note: For the first time we have a ratio of less then >> 100 when comparing "total compiled lines of code" vs "our code": >> >> Total: compiled: 16378361 real: 164656 ratio: 99 >> >> We

Re: Compiling LyX 1.4.x on opensuse 10.2

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan Dear JMarc, after succesfully building an 1.5.0svn checkout Stephan on the OpenSUSE 10.2 platform I tried to build the current Stephan 1.4.4 stable release because the distribution is shipped with Stephan

Re: Compiling LyX 1.4.x on opensuse 10.2

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stephan> Dear JMarc, after succesfully building an 1.5.0svn checkout > Stephan> on the OpenSUSE 10.2 platform I tried to build the current > Stephan> 1.4.4 stable release because the distribution is

Re: Compiling LyX 1.4.x on opensuse 10.2

I'd check that you're finding the QT3 libraries. 1.5.svn uses QT4. Stephan Witt wrote: Dear JMarc, after succesfully building an 1.5.0svn checkout on the OpenSUSE 10.2 platform I tried to build the current 1.4.4 stable release because the distribution is shipped with 1.4.2. But I failed

Re: Compiling LyX 1.4.x on opensuse 10.2

Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan Dear JMarc, after succesfully building an 1.5.0svn checkout Stephan on the OpenSUSE 10.2 platform I tried to build the current Stephan 1.4.4 stable release because the distribution is shipped with Stephan 1.4.2. But I failed miserably and

  1   2   3   4   >