Re: ext_copy.py

2017-08-10 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 9/08/2017 3:35 a.m., José Abílio Matos wrote: On Thursday, 25 May 2017 01.31.05 WEST Andrew Parsloe wrote: (Deep breath.) I think ext_copy.py is only half of a pair of scripts. The other half is a "dummy exporter", something like ## dummy_export.py ## a minimal script used

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-08-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 03:33:55PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 23.03.22 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > No problem at all. I hope you don't mind my nagging emails (if you > do, > > please say so). > > Not only I do not mind them but I appreciate them. :-) > > I apol

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-08-08 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 01.31.05 WEST Andrew Parsloe wrote: > (Deep breath.) I think ext_copy.py is only half of a pair of scripts. > The other half is a "dummy exporter", something like > > ## dummy_export.py > ## a minimal script used to 'export' the >

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-08-08 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 23.03.22 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > No problem at all. I hope you don't mind my nagging emails (if you do, > please say so). Not only I do not mind them but I appreciate them. :-) I apologize for taking so long, after reading ~1100 pages (tikz manual) and ~550 pages (

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-08-08 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Monday, 7 August 2017 02.52.12 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 06:03:22PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:33:02AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > On Saturday, 1 July 2017 04.54.15 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Pinging José. > > > >

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-08-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 06:03:22PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:33:02AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Saturday, 1 July 2017 04.54.15 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Pinging José. > > > > > > Scott > > > > I am sorry for the huge latency time but I have bee

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-07-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:33:02AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Saturday, 1 July 2017 04.54.15 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Pinging José. > > > > Scott > > I am sorry for the huge latency time but I have been busy with exams & Co. > That period is now over. No problem at all. I hope

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-07-04 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Saturday, 1 July 2017 04.54.15 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Pinging José. > > Scott I am sorry for the huge latency time but I have been busy with exams & Co. That period is now over. Is it OK then to apply the patch? Regards, -- José Abílio

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-06-30 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:33:47PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 01:23:14PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:31:05PM +1200, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > > > > On 24/05/2017 9:24 p.m., José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 03

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-06-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 01:23:14PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:31:05PM +1200, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > > On 24/05/2017 9:24 p.m., José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 03.51.55 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > > Any objection from anyone

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-05-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:31:05PM +1200, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > On 24/05/2017 9:24 p.m., José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 03.51.55 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > Any objection from anyone else? > > > > > > > Scott > > > > Honestly the use of the plus sign as a

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-05-24 Thread Andrew Parsloe
ext_copy.py is only half of a pair of scripts. The other half is a "dummy exporter", something like ## dummy_export.py ## a minimal script used to 'export' the ## current document and excite the LyX ## copier mechanism into action import sys fin = open(sys.argv[1], &#x

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-05-24 Thread José Abílio Matos
e of this approach it that it does not add new special characters. A patch follows attached. I have not updated the documentation. Regards, -- José Abílio diff --git a/lib/scripts/ext_copy.py b/lib/scripts/ext_copy.py index fb70d7bbba..dae9ae616f 100644 --- a/lib/scripts/ext_copy.py +++ b/lib/scripts/ex

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-05-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:44:05PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 05/04/2017 07:15 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > I would like to see the following small change made to the script > > ext_copy.py for 2.3.0: > > > > Currently it contains the lines: > > > >

Re: ext_copy.py

2017-05-04 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/04/2017 07:15 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > I would like to see the following small change made to the script > ext_copy.py for 2.3.0: > > Currently it contains the lines: > > # output directory > to_dir = args[1] > if targext != '.': > to_di

ext_copy.py

2017-05-04 Thread Andrew Parsloe
I would like to see the following small change made to the script ext_copy.py for 2.3.0: Currently it contains the lines: # output directory to_dir = args[1] if targext != '.': to_dir += "." + targext Change this to # output directory if targext == '+':