Has anyone considered optionally permitting a graphic to be signified
simply by it's file name, instead of a (potentially) enormous box
reflecting LyX's representation of its "size"?
Working on a document with a significant number of 1/4 to 1/2 page
sized graphics, I'm finding that the
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:49:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone considered optionally permitting a graphic to be signified
simply by it's file name, instead of a (potentially) enormous box
reflecting LyX's representation of its "size"?
Working on a document with a significant
In the coming graphics inset if you will choose not to render the images
it wont scale them and will leave them as a small rectangle.
Actually, it does that even if it is rendered. Is it worth it to scale the
image in the LyX editing window, or can I avoid this hassle?
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001
Has anyone considered optionally permitting a graphic to be signified
simply by it's file name, instead of a (potentially) enormous box
reflecting LyX's representation of its "size"?
Working on a document with a significant number of 1/4 to 1/2 page
sized graphics, I'm finding that the
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:49:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone considered optionally permitting a graphic to be signified
> simply by it's file name, instead of a (potentially) enormous box
> reflecting LyX's representation of its "size"?
>
> Working on a document with a
In the coming graphics inset if you will choose not to render the images
it wont scale them and will leave them as a small rectangle.
Actually, it does that even if it is rendered. Is it worth it to scale the
image in the LyX editing window, or can I avoid this hassle?
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001
