Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Samstag 27 März 2010 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: We need someone having OSX. You already have some experience there. It is not soo difficult to start with cmake. Maybe you could step in here? Code specific for OSX in e.g.

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Samstag 27 März 2010 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > We need someone having OSX. You already have some experience there. It is > > not soo difficult to start with cmake. Maybe you could step in here? > > > > Code specific for OSX in e.g.

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 27.03.2010 um 05:09 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 22.03.2010 um 14:58 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should create the application

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: This is the error I get when building the cmake project with Xcode (output from Xcode window): CreateUniversalBinary /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-cmake/bin/Debug/lyxclient normal ppc i386 cd

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 27.03.2010 um 05:09 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 22.03.2010 um 14:58 schrieb BH: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should >

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > This is the error I get when building the cmake project with Xcode (output > from Xcode window): > > CreateUniversalBinary /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-cmake/bin/Debug/lyxclient > normal "ppc i386" > cd

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 22.03.2010 um 14:58 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should create the application bundle, but it doesn't. When I use

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: We need someone having OSX. You already have some experience there. It is not soo difficult to start with cmake. Maybe you could step in here? Code specific for OSX in e.g. CMakeLists.txt would look like this:  if(APPLE)  

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 22.03.2010 um 14:58 schrieb BH: > >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should create the application bundle, but it

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > We need someone having OSX. You already have some experience there. It is not > soo difficult > to start with cmake. Maybe you could step in here? > > Code specific for OSX in e.g. CMakeLists.txt would look like this: >  

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes: Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes: It depends on the MAC packager really. I personally prefer to avoid indirection and our spellchecker API is just enough for our use. Using Enchant means that the MAC package will have to take care of glib

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > Abdelrazak Younes writes: >> It depends on the MAC packager really. I personally prefer to avoid >> indirection and our spellchecker API is just enough for our use. Using >> Enchant means that the MAC package will have to take

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 24.03.2010 um 00:04 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: for an alpha release I may provide my current disk image without it. better than nothing. 10.4 is 5 years old and according to wikipedia As of November 2009, Apple will not be releasing any more security updates for Tiger.

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 24.03.2010 um 11:03 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: how and where should I upload this disk image? Yesterday I've build it from alpha1 tar-ball. do you have possibility to put the binary anywhere where i can download it? (for example the computer aussie.lyx.org still works and

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Stephan Witt wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: how and where should I upload this disk image? Yesterday I've build it from alpha1 tar-ball. do you have possibility to put the binary anywhere where i can download it? (for example the computer aussie.lyx.org still works and you have ssh

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 24.03.2010 um 15:13 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: how and where should I upload this disk image? Yesterday I've build it from alpha1 tar-ball. do you have possibility to put the binary anywhere where i can download it? (for example the computer

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 24.03.2010 um 00:04 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> for an alpha release I may provide my current disk image without it. > > better than nothing. 10.4 is 5 years old and according to wikipedia > "As of November 2009, Apple will not be releasing any more security updates > for

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 24.03.2010 um 11:03 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> how and where should I upload this disk image? Yesterday I've build it from >> alpha1 tar-ball. > > do you have possibility to put the binary anywhere where i can download it? > (for example the computer aussie.lyx.org still

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Stephan Witt wrote: > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> how and where should I upload this disk image? Yesterday I've build it > >> from alpha1 tar-ball. > > > > do you have possibility to put the binary anywhere where i can download it? > > (for example the computer aussie.lyx.org still works and you

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 24.03.2010 um 15:13 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Stephan Witt wrote: how and where should I upload this disk image? Yesterday I've build it from alpha1 tar-ball. >>> >>> do you have possibility to put the binary anywhere where i can download it? >>> (for example

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes: No, I really meant that implementing that in LyX directly is easier that implementing that in Enchant if it was there already. If you like coding in Objective C++, yes. But this is really a weird beast. I attach the file from enchant as reference. I am

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/23/2010 02:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak Younesyou...@lyx.org writes: No, I really meant that implementing that in LyX directly is easier that implementing that in Enchant if it was there already. If you like coding in Objective C++, yes. But this is really a

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 23.03.2010 um 15:00 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2010 02:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak Younesyou...@lyx.org writes: No, I really meant that implementing that in LyX directly is easier that implementing that in Enchant if it was there already. If you like

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes: It depends on the MAC packager really. I personally prefer to avoid indirection and our spellchecker API is just enough for our use. Using Enchant means that the MAC package will have to take care of glib integration in the build system. Agreed. The

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 13:07 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: BTW, what do you think is a *must* to support platform-wise and what is nice to have? I think we must support 10.5, with a strong preference for 10.4. I think we must support PPC. And

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Stephan Witt wrote: for an alpha release I may provide my current disk image without it. better than nothing. 10.4 is 5 years old and according to wikipedia As of November 2009, Apple will not be releasing any more security updates for Tiger. so even apple do not care anymore. i have no idea

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Abdelrazak Younes writes: > No, I really meant that implementing that in LyX directly is easier > that implementing that in Enchant if it was there already. If you like coding in Objective C++, yes. But this is really a weird beast. I attach the file from enchant as reference. >

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/23/2010 02:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes writes: No, I really meant that implementing that in LyX directly is easier that implementing that in Enchant if it was there already. If you like coding in Objective C++, yes. But this is really a

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 23.03.2010 um 15:00 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/23/2010 02:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Abdelrazak Younes writes: >> >>> No, I really meant that implementing that in LyX directly is easier >>> that implementing that in Enchant if it was there already. >>>

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Abdelrazak Younes writes: > It depends on the MAC packager really. I personally prefer to avoid > indirection and our spellchecker API is just enough for our use. Using > Enchant means that the MAC package will have to take care of glib > integration in the build system. Agreed.

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 13:07 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> BTW, what do you think is a *must* to support platform-wise and what is nice >> to have? > > I think we must support 10.5, with a strong preference for 10.4. I > think we must

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Stephan Witt wrote: >for an alpha release I may provide my current disk image without it. better than nothing. 10.4 is 5 years old and according to wikipedia "As of November 2009, Apple will not be releasing any more security updates for Tiger." so even apple do not care anymore. i have no idea

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll do that later... do you know if that build is working with Qt4 of macports? You should really try Nokia's binaries IMHO. Abdel.

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: (Note that doing make install with cmake won't properly put everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the files are going in the relevant places yourself.) Please report back those issue to the list, I am sure Kornel, Peter or I

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 09:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll do that later... do you know if that build is working with Qt4 of macports? You should really try Nokia's binaries IMHO. I tried it (the SDK). And failed to build LyX. autoconf didn't

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 09:46 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 22.03.2010 um 09:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll do that later... do you know if that build is working with Qt4 of macports? You should really try Nokia's binaries IMHO. I

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Montag, 22. März 2010 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: (Note that doing make install with cmake won't properly put everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the files are going in the relevant places yourself.) Please report

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 22.03.2010 um 01:10 schrieb BH: It's easy to compile Qt for PPC and Intel: just add the following when configuring: -universal -sdk /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk Thanks for the hint. I'll do this now and we'll see how

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote: On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: (Note that doing make install with cmake won't properly put everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the files are going in the relevant places yourself.)

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 01:07 PM, BH wrote: As I've noted in other e-mails, I think it's very desirable to provide spelling and thesaurus support built in. For spelling, the preferred way to go is to provide enchant hooks to the native spellchecker. Does Enchant already support the Mac native

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Montag, 22. März 2010 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote: On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: (Note that doing make install with cmake won't properly put everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the files are

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote: On 03/22/2010 01:07 PM, BH wrote: As I've noted in other e-mails, I think it's very desirable to provide spelling and thesaurus support built in. For spelling, the preferred way to go is to provide enchant hooks to the

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 02:33 PM, BH wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Abdelrazak Younesyou...@lyx.org wrote: On 03/22/2010 01:07 PM, BH wrote: As I've noted in other e-mails, I think it's very desirable to provide spelling and thesaurus support built in. For spelling, the preferred way

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should create the application bundle, but it doesn't. When I use unix makefiles, doing make install indeed puts most everything inside the LyX.app bundle, but not in the

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Montag, 22. März 2010 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should create the application bundle, but it doesn't. When I use unix makefiles, doing make install indeed puts most everything inside

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 14:58 schrieb BH: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should create the application bundle, but it doesn't. When I use unix makefiles, doing make install indeed puts most everything inside the

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

BH wrote: (There will be no Mac binary for 2.0alpha1.) if the only reason is that some autotools/cmake files are not prepared properly in tarball, feel free to change them... pavel

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll do that later... do you know if that build is working with Qt4 of macports? You should really try Nokia's binaries IMHO. Abdel.

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: (Note that doing "make install" with cmake won't properly put everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the files are going in the relevant places yourself.) Please report back those issue to the list, I am sure Kornel, Peter or I

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 09:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I'll do that later... do you know if that build is working with Qt4 of >> macports? >> > > You should really try Nokia's binaries IMHO. I tried it (the SDK). And failed to build LyX. autoconf

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 09:46 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 22.03.2010 um 09:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll do that later... do you know if that build is working with Qt4 of macports? You should really try Nokia's binaries IMHO. I

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Montag, 22. März 2010 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: > > (Note that doing "make install" with cmake won't properly put > > everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the > > files are going in the relevant places yourself.) > > > >

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 22.03.2010 um 01:10 schrieb BH: >> It's easy to compile Qt for PPC and Intel: just add the following when >> configuring: >> >> -universal -sdk /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk > > Thanks for the hint. I'll do this now and

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: >> >> (Note that doing "make install" with cmake won't properly put >> everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the >> files are going in the relevant places

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 01:07 PM, BH wrote: As I've noted in other e-mails, I think it's very desirable to provide spelling and thesaurus support built in. For spelling, the preferred way to go is to provide enchant hooks to the native spellchecker. Does Enchant already support the Mac native

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Montag, 22. März 2010 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > On 03/22/2010 01:10 AM, BH wrote: > >> > >> (Note that doing "make install" with cmake won't properly put > >> everything in the LyX-2.0.app bundle. So you'll have to make sure the

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 03/22/2010 01:07 PM, BH wrote: >> >> As I've noted in other e-mails, I think it's very desirable to provide >> spelling and thesaurus support built in. For spelling, the preferred >> way to go is to provide enchant

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On 03/22/2010 02:33 PM, BH wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 03/22/2010 01:07 PM, BH wrote: As I've noted in other e-mails, I think it's very desirable to provide spelling and thesaurus support built in. For spelling, the preferred

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should >> create the application bundle, but it doesn't. When I use unix >> makefiles, doing "make install" indeed puts most everything inside the >> LyX.app bundle, but not

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am Montag, 22. März 2010 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should > >> create the application bundle, but it doesn't. When I use unix > >> makefiles, doing "make install" indeed puts most

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 14:58 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: >>> The problem is installing it. When XCode builds, it should >>> create the application bundle, but it doesn't. When I use unix >>> makefiles, doing "make install" indeed puts most

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

BH wrote: > (There will be no Mac binary for 2.0alpha1.) if the only reason is that some autotools/cmake files are not prepared properly in tarball, feel free to change them... pavel

lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

hey, again i do have a make error compiling lyx-devel rev. 33817, here are my commands : $ svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk lyx-devel ... Checked out revision 33817. $ cd lyx-devel $ cd ./autogen.sh Using automake (GNU automake) 1.11.1 Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.65 Building

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Hi Yvon, some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it too.) I had not enough energy to search for the root of the problem. I guess it is related to processor architecture of the build of some

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Stephan Witt wrote: Hi Yvon, some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it too.) I had not enough energy to search for the root of the problem. I guess it is related to processor architecture

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: Hi Yvon, some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it too.) I had not enough energy to search for the root

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 21.03.2010 um 15:10 schrieb BH: On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: Hi Yvon, some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it too.) I had not

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: After reading the mails in the thread I tried to build LyX myself. See below... I currently cannot compile with autotools, getting the same error as Yvon. (And that's with a self-compiled Qt4.) I don't have time to

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 01:10 schrieb BH: On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: After reading the mails in the thread I tried to build LyX myself. See below... I currently cannot compile with autotools, getting the same error as Yvon. (And that's with a

lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

hey, again i do have a make error compiling lyx-devel rev. 33817, here are my commands : $ svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk lyx-devel ... Checked out revision 33817. $ cd lyx-devel $ cd ./autogen.sh Using automake (GNU automake) 1.11.1 Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.65 Building

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Hi Yvon, some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it too.) I had not enough energy to search for the root of the problem. I guess it is related to processor architecture of the build of some

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Stephan Witt wrote: > Hi Yvon, > > some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same > error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it too.) I > had not enough energy to search for the root of the problem. I guess it is > related to processor

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Hi Yvon, >> >> some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same >> error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it too.) I >> had not enough energy to search

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 21.03.2010 um 15:10 schrieb BH: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Hi Yvon, >>> >>> some days ago I tried to build LyX trunk version and failed with the same >>> error when using the macports Qt4 library. (I see you are using it

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > After reading the mails in the thread I tried to build LyX myself. > See below... > >> >> I currently cannot compile with autotools, getting the same error as >> Yvon. (And that's with a self-compiled Qt4.) I don't have time

Re: lyx rev. 33817 make error on mac os x SL

Am 22.03.2010 um 01:10 schrieb BH: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> After reading the mails in the thread I tried to build LyX myself. >> See below... >> >>> >>> I currently cannot compile with autotools, getting the same error as >>> Yvon. (And that's