Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:43:57PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:30:31PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > > The problem is that EmbeddedObjects.lyx was already format 498, and lyx2lyx > > seems to do the wrong thing when asked to convert it to the format it > > already

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 06:22:11PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:43:57PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:30:31PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > > > > The problem is that EmbeddedObjects.lyx was already format 498, and > > > lyx2lyx > > >

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

Am 04.11.2015 um 00:23 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Uwe, can you take a look at this bug? I think it has to do with the 491 and 492 format changes. Thanks for the pointer. In lyx2lyx I forgot to add the xcolor package to the preamble. This is now fixed:

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:38:37AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 04.11.2015 um 00:23 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>Uwe, can you take a look at this bug? I think it has to do with the 491 > >>and 492 format changes. > > Thanks for the pointer. > > In lyx2lyx I forgot to add the xcolor package to

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

Richard Heck wrote: > I think it would be a perfectly reasonable requirement from now on > ---say, starting in the 2.3.x development cycle---that every format > change be accompanied by some kind of test file that illustrates the use > of the new feature (that's what it usually is) and that can

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 20:14:40, schrieb Richard Heck > On 11/01/2015 08:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:36:53PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > >>On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > >>On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >>>The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master > >[1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx files to > >2.1.x format. So this is in some

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master [1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx files to 2.1.x format. So this is in some sense a compilation test of roundtrip lyx2lyx. Is what this shows just

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 11/01/2015 01:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:36:53PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> >Since you brought it up though, Kornel and I have discussed comparing > >> >the

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 11/01/2015 08:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Since you brought it up though, Kornel and I have

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> >Since you brought it up though, Kornel and I have discussed comparing >> >the .tex files. While we understand that the .lyx files are not expected >>

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master [1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:30:31PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > The problem is that EmbeddedObjects.lyx was already format 498, and lyx2lyx > seems to do the wrong thing when asked to convert it to the format it > already is, i.e., to convert to 498. > > I've committed a patch that simply does

lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master [1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx files to 2.1.x format. So this is in some sense a compilation test of roundtrip lyx2lyx. Any lyx2lyx experts want to take a look? Scott [1] I am running the