On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:35:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Attached find a patch which includes:
- a placeholder format change for bug 1820
Either we change the file format now or we don't. I don't want to be in
a
gray area. Since we have decided not to convert old document do I think
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:35:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jose --- can I commit the patch itself, along with these additions?
Without the placeholder for the file format yes.
Committed (finally :) ) as r19150, without the placeholder format.
I made some changes to this
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:35:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Attached find a patch which includes:
>
> - a placeholder format change for bug 1820
Either we change the file format now or we don't. I don't want to be in
a
gray area. Since we have decided not to convert old document do I
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:35:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jose --- can I commit the patch itself, along with these additions?
Without the placeholder for the file format yes.
Committed (finally :) ) as r19150, without the placeholder format.
I made some changes to this
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:21:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating incorrect latex
for, and patch 1820 fixes
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating incorrect latex
for, and
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:35:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:21:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
> lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
> .lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating incorrect latex
> for, and patch 1820
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating incorrect latex
for, and
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:35:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Dov Feldstern wrote:
> > José Matos wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >>> Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
> >>> lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix,
Hi!
Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just spent the past
six hours on this and I'm not sure that it's doable.
Also, this has only
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:21:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just spent the past
six hours
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:21:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just
Hi!
Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just spent the past
six hours on this and I'm not sure that it's doable.
Also, this has only
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:21:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
> actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
> anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just spent
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:21:52AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached find a lyx2lyx for patch 1820. It's not perfect, though --- it
actually corrupts some files which shouldn't be changed at all; if
anyone wants to try and fix that, be my guest, I've just
20 matches
Mail list logo
