On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:45:57AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>
> >> The current status is now (see the
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>> The current status is now (see the docs list for details):
>>
>> - Pedro Neves proposed some different
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I overlooked
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately I overlooked something in the portuguese translation, I
>> hope I'll get an answer today, so
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >
> >> I'd really like to wait for the final updates for pt_PT and pt_BR for RC1
> >> if possible.
> >
> > OK we'll wait.
>
> Thank you very
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> I'd really like to wait for the final updates for pt_PT and pt_BR for RC1
>> if possible.
>
> OK we'll wait.
Thank you very much. The brazialian translation is OK now (but it turned out
that a string
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:17:01AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 01.04.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
> >Note that Peter made some further tests and found out that the merged build
> >does not fix the crash, but only hides it:
> >http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10009
>
> Yes, and Peter
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> I'd really like to wait for the final updates for pt_PT and pt_BR for RC1 if
> possible.
OK we'll wait.
> The good news is that the percentage of reviewed strings in 2.2.0 will be
> higher than in 2.1.0.
That is good news indeed.
Am 01.04.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Georg Baum:
Note that Peter made some further tests and found out that the merged build
does not fix the crash, but only hides it:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10009
Yes, and Peter already fixed this this weekend. I used the latest Qt 5.6
build with this
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Thanks to the help of several LyX developers who addressed needed issues
> for 2.2.0rc1, we are getting close. I would like to propose Tuesday as
> the tentative date to tag and tar rc1. There are still some issues that
> are pending but I hope that they
Den 01. april 2016 22:13, skrev Scott Kostyshak:
What I didn't fully grasp until it was explained to
me is that even more important than testing Qt 5.6.0 is testing a binary
built from a new compiler version.
If the compiler version matters: I compiled LyX with gcc 5.3.0 (64-bit), and
Le 01/04/2016 04:43, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
1. At #10019 Guillaume fixed some ui regressions. The patch seems short
and logical and Stephan has tested it with success on Mac. I would still
like to see if someone can test it on Windows before it is included. If
anyone with Qt knowledge can
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> 2. There is a mysterious crash with the MSVC2015
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10009 which does not happen with a merged
> build. Since we do not understand why a merged build "fixes" the crash we
> do not know what other problems might be created by the same cause.
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 08:39:14AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
> On 2016-04-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Günter has proposed layout patches to respond to changes in updated
> > LaTeX class files at the following two threads:
> > (acmsiggraph)
> >
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:02:39PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
>
> Den 01. april 2016 04:43, skrev Scott Kostyshak:
> >
> >The disadvantages of using Qt 5.6.0 instead of 5.5.1 are the following:
> >
> >1. Although Uwe tested and it works for him, no one else has tested. We would
> >thus lose
Den 01. april 2016 04:43, skrev Scott Kostyshak:
The disadvantages of using Qt 5.6.0 instead of 5.5.1 are the following:
1. Although Uwe tested and it works for him, no one else has tested. We would
thus lose all Windows-specific testing effort of the beta testers.
I have also used
Dear all,
On 2016-04-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Günter has proposed layout patches to respond to changes in updated
> LaTeX class files at the following two threads:
> (acmsiggraph)
> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=ndgr7a%24kuf%241%40ger.gmane.org
> (aastex6)
>
Dear all,
Thanks to the help of several LyX developers who addressed needed issues
for 2.2.0rc1, we are getting close. I would like to propose Tuesday as
the tentative date to tag and tar rc1. There are still some issues that
are pending but I hope that they can be resolved by then.
Georg is
18 matches
Mail list logo
