Re: scrjura.layout

2016-03-19 Thread meik michalke
Am Freitag, 18. März 2016, 19:09:50 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Am Freitag, den 18.03.2016, 16:19 +0100 schrieb meik michalke: > > allthough i've set "InToc 1" for both, they don't show up. is this > > not yet supported for flex insets? > > No. This is http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7790

Re: scrjura.layout

2016-03-19 Thread meik michalke
is another way than flex > insets for what you are trying to achieve. here's what i have so far, in case someone likes to have a closer look: http://reaktanz.de/stuff/LyX/scrjura.layout http://reaktanz.de/stuff/LyX/scrjura_example.lyx some notes: - you must declare the start and end of a contra

Re: scrjura.layout

2016-03-19 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 18/03/2016 18:09, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Freitag, den 18.03.2016, 16:19 +0100 schrieb meik michalke: allthough i've set "InToc 1" for both, they don't show up. is this not yet supported for flex insets? No. This is http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7790 Some work towards

scrjura.layout

2016-03-19 Thread meik michalke
hi, i'm writing a .layout file to support the scrjura package in LyX. there's an issue i'm currently struggling with: is it possible to make flex:inset layouts appear in the in the document structure (TOC) somehow? some background: in a legal document, paragraphs usually don't have a name but

Re: scrjura.layout

2016-03-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 18.03.2016, 16:19 +0100 schrieb meik michalke: > allthough i've set "InToc 1" for both, they don't show up. is this > not yet  > supported for flex insets? No. This is http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7790 Some work towards implementing it has already been done for forthcoming 2.2,