Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Agreed. While the only advices to avoid "using" in headers I could find
> are about "using namespace", I do not see a reason either not to have as
> a rule what you wrote.
IMHO the only difference between using complete namespaces or single symbols
is statistics: For
On 06/25/2016 03:56 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
> I recently stumbled upon
>
> using std::shared_ptr;
>
> or
>
> lyx::support::FileName;
>
> in header files (e.g. TocBackend.h). The shared_ptr was introduced as part
> of the lyx::shared_ptr removal (which did either point to boost or std), but
> there
Le 25/06/2016 20:56, Georg Baum a écrit :
I recently stumbled upon
using std::shared_ptr;
or
lyx::support::FileName;
in header files (e.g. TocBackend.h). The shared_ptr was introduced as part
of the lyx::shared_ptr removal (which did either point to boost or std), but
there are other hits as
I recently stumbled upon
using std::shared_ptr;
or
lyx::support::FileName;
in header files (e.g. TocBackend.h). The shared_ptr was introduced as part
of the lyx::shared_ptr removal (which did either point to boost or std), but
there are other hits as well. While I understand that in this
