Feature request

Dear Lyx Developer Team, I have already written part of my PhD thesis in Lyx and am thoroughly impressed by the aesthetically stunning documents that Lyx produces!!! Considering that Lyx is capable of such fantastic feats, would it be possible to have a send email function/button/menu to send

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 12:21, Shlomo Brill: Dear Lyx Developer Team, I have already written part of my PhD thesis in Lyx and am thoroughly impressed by the aesthetically stunning documents that Lyx produces!!! Considering that Lyx is capable of such fantastic feats, would it be possible to have a send email

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 12:28:26, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org 24/04/2014 12:21, Shlomo Brill: Dear Lyx Developer Team, I have already written part of my PhD thesis in Lyx and am thoroughly impressed by the aesthetically stunning documents that Lyx produces!!!

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: Hmm, we produce also .html, don't we? And this could be sent per e-mail. I am not saying, that it will be easy to implement. But it may be possible. What is so beautiful about the typography of the .html files we export, though? JMarc

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200 Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release. Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're going to have the fourth LyX Workshop here at POuL and

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

24/04/2014 14:41, Alessandro Di Federico: On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200 Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release. Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're going to

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org 24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: Hmm, we produce also .html, don't we? And this could be sent per e-mail. I am not saying, that it will be easy to implement. But it may be possible. What is so

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 15:02, Kornel Benko: What is so beautiful about the typography of the .html files we export, though? C'mon, its not so bad. For a mail it should be OK. Do you see an added value wrt whatever html one can produce with thunderbird or whatever mail client? Disclaimer: I do only

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 15:08:22, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org 24/04/2014 15:02, Kornel Benko: What is so beautiful about the typography of the .html files we export, though? C'mon, its not so bad. For a mail it should be OK. Do you see an added value

Re: Feature request

Kornel Benko wrote: C'mon, its not so bad. Which is little bit far away from aesthetically stunning documents, right? :) Anyway as pointed out by JMarc we should try to be good at one thing and let emails client to do their own. Pavel

Re: Does the AEA.lyx template compile for you?

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:33 PM, K. Yokota yokot...@gmail.com wrote: multicol 2011/06/27 v1.7a vs. multicol 2004/02/14 v1.6e and setspace 2011/12/19 v6.7a vs. setspace' 6.7 2000/12/01 My multicol and setspace are the ones which came together with AEA.cls. They are not included in my

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 06:25:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org Kornel Benko wrote: C'mon, its not so bad. Which is little bit far away from aesthetically stunning documents, right? :) It depends. But I understand the point. Anyway as pointed out by JMarc we should try to

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org 24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: Hmm, we produce also .html, don't we? And this could be sent per e-mail. I am not saying, that it

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 16:33:03, schrieb Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org 24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: Hmm, we

Re: Feature request

Kornel Benko wrote: Html is inappropriate for email http://www.avernus.com/~gadams/essays/20020418-html-mail.html This is convincing. So the format for email (if ever implemented by lyx) may be Enriched text. Hehe, so time to drop html part of your emails to this list ;) P

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 07:49:02, schrieb Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org Kornel Benko wrote: Html is inappropriate for email http://www.avernus.com/~gadams/essays/20020418-html-mail.html This is convincing. So the format for email (if ever implemented by lyx) may be Enriched

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 17:00:16, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 07:49:02, schrieb Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org Kornel Benko wrote: Html is inappropriate for email http://www.avernus.com/~gadams/essays/20020418-html-mail.html This

Re: Feature request

Kornel Benko wrote: Hehe, so time to drop html part of your emails to this list ;) P I was not even aware of the html part. Cannot see, how to disable it from inside kmail. Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you could strip from time to time unrelevant

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 17:02, Kornel Benko: I was not even aware of the html part. Cannot see, how to disable it from inside kmail. I think, I found it. Test only. Oooh Kornel, I will miss your messages that used to appear as ugly typewriter font things :) It is much better now. JMarc

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 17:12, Pavel Sanda: Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you could strip from time to time unrelevant part of email exchanges you reply to ;) We have a problem with gmail users these days. Since gmail hides these long replies by default, people just

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 17:15:27, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org 24/04/2014 17:12, Pavel Sanda: Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you could strip from time to time unrelevant part of email exchanges you reply to ;) We have a

Re: Feature request

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 24/04/2014 17:12, Pavel Sanda: Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you could strip from time to time unrelevant part of email exchanges you reply to ;) We have a problem with gmail users these days. Since gmail hides these long

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 17:13:57, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org 24/04/2014 17:02, Kornel Benko: I was not even aware of the html part. Cannot see, how to disable it from inside kmail. I think, I found it. Test only. Oooh Kornel, I will miss your messages

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: We have a problem with gmail users these days. Since gmail hides these long replies by default, people just let them in their messages... Maybe kmail has the same feature. Another problem is that some mailing

Re: Feature request

You might be right, but I think that ship has already sailed. -- Sean Patrick Burke On Apr 24, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

Re: Feature request

Scott Kostyshak wrote: Another problem is that some mailing lists require/encourage quote prior messages in entirety (e.g. It makes any longer exchange unreadable. I remember to delete few whole threads past few months without reading on this list because people were either lazy or not willing

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: Another problem is that some mailing lists require/encourage quote prior messages in entirety (e.g. It makes any longer exchange unreadable. Agreed. When involved in the exchange I usually care to

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:53:07AM -0400, Sean Burke wrote: You might be right, but I think that ship has already sailed. Yes, you cannot stop progress, apparently ;) -- Enrico A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting

Re: Feature request

On Apr 24, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:53:07AM -0400, Sean Burke wrote: You might be right, but I think that ship has already sailed. Yes, you cannot stop progress, apparently ;) -- Enrico Ha ha ha. I can practically hear the air

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Stephan Witt wrote: Sorry, you're wrong. My Mac comes with 2.7.2 and I have to install some additional software package to use python 3. It's possible, but I don't recommend to force users to do so. It's a hassle and I've heard of users getting problems with software suddenly broken because

Re: lyx2lyx bug

Richard Heck wrote: This is close to right, but the problem is in the conversion of layouts. It's fine not to quote the names. Look at e.g. logicalmkup.module. Mone of the InsetLayout names are quoted, yet they work fine. The problem is that there is some buggy conversion code, and it seems

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

On Apr 22, 2014 10:55 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski bpiwo...@lyx.org wrote: There is not much to do for python 3 compatibility, but still… I attached the patch this time. Benjamin I have one comment and one question regarding this patch. The comment: if we're only concerned with supporting Python

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Le 24/04/14 23:13, Josh Hieronymus a écrit : The comment: if we're only concerned with supporting Python 2.7 and up, we could include the statement from __future__ import print_function in any file in which we use the print function, as this allows us to use all of the features of the Python 3.X

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Mac OS 10.9 (Mavericks) has 2.7.5 installed. So we should keep 2.7.X compatibility. I think most people still use 2.7, as 3.X is relatively new (in terms of software maintenance/update cycles) and it takes considerable effort to switch a project over to 3.X. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Am 25.04.2014 um 01:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org: Le 24/04/14 23:13, Josh Hieronymus a écrit : The comment: if we're only concerned with supporting Python 2.7 and up, we could include the statement from __future__ import print_function in any file in which we use the

Feature request

Dear Lyx Developer Team, I have already written part of my PhD thesis in Lyx and am thoroughly impressed by the aesthetically stunning documents that Lyx produces!!! Considering that Lyx is capable of such fantastic feats, would it be possible to have a "send email" function/button/menu to send

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 12:21, Shlomo Brill: Dear Lyx Developer Team, I have already written part of my PhD thesis in Lyx and am thoroughly impressed by the aesthetically stunning documents that Lyx produces!!! Considering that Lyx is capable of such fantastic feats, would it be possible to have a "send

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 12:28:26, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > 24/04/2014 12:21, Shlomo Brill: > > Dear Lyx Developer Team, > > I have already written part of my PhD thesis in Lyx and am thoroughly > > impressed by the aesthetically stunning documents that Lyx

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: Hmm, we produce also .html, don't we? And this could be sent per e-mail. I am not saying, that it will be easy to implement. But it may be possible. What is so beautiful about the typography of the .html files we export, though? JMarc

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before > announcing the release. Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're going to have the fourth LyX Workshop here at POuL

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

24/04/2014 14:41, Alessandro Di Federico: On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release. Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're going to

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > 24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: > > Hmm, we produce also .html, don't we? And this could be sent per e-mail. > > I am not saying, that it will be easy to implement. But it may be possible. > > What is

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 15:02, Kornel Benko: > What is so beautiful about the typography of the .html files we export, > though? C'mon, its not so bad. For a mail it should be OK. Do you see an added value wrt whatever html one can produce with thunderbird or whatever mail client? Disclaimer: I do

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 15:08:22, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > 24/04/2014 15:02, Kornel Benko: > > > What is so beautiful about the typography of the .html files we export, > > > though? > > > > C'mon, its not so bad. For a mail it should be OK. > > Do you see

Re: Feature request

Kornel Benko wrote: > C'mon, its not so bad. Which is little bit far away from "aesthetically stunning documents", right? :) Anyway as pointed out by JMarc we should try to be good at one thing and let emails client to do their own. Pavel

Re: Does the AEA.lyx template compile for you?

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:33 PM, K. Yokota wrote: >> multicol 2011/06/27 v1.7a vs. multicol 2004/02/14 v1.6e > >> and > >> setspace 2011/12/19 v6.7a vs. setspace' 6.7 <2000/12/01> > > > My multicol and setspace are the ones which came together with AEA.cls. They > are not

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 06:25:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda > Kornel Benko wrote: > > C'mon, its not so bad. > > Which is little bit far away from "aesthetically stunning documents", right? > :) It depends. But I understand the point. > Anyway as pointed out by JMarc we

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > > 24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: > > > Hmm, we produce also .html, don't we? And this could be sent per e-mail. > > > I am not saying,

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 16:33:03, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > > > > 24/04/2014 13:16, Kornel Benko: > >

Re: Feature request

Kornel Benko wrote: > > Html is inappropriate for email > > http://www.avernus.com/~gadams/essays/20020418-html-mail.html > > > > This is convincing. So the format for email (if ever implemented by lyx) may > be Enriched text. Hehe, so time to drop html part of your emails to this list ;) P

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 07:49:02, schrieb Pavel Sanda > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Html is inappropriate for email > > > http://www.avernus.com/~gadams/essays/20020418-html-mail.html > > > > > > > This is convincing. So the format for email (if ever implemented by lyx) >

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 17:00:16, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 07:49:02, schrieb Pavel Sanda > > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Html is inappropriate for email > > > > http://www.avernus.com/~gadams/essays/20020418-html-mail.html >

Re: Feature request

Kornel Benko wrote: > > Hehe, so time to drop html part of your emails to this list ;) > > P > > I was not even aware of the html part. Cannot see, how to disable it from > inside kmail. Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you could strip from time to time

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 17:02, Kornel Benko: I was not even aware of the html part. Cannot see, how to disable it from inside kmail. I think, I found it. Test only. Oooh Kornel, I will miss your messages that used to appear as ugly typewriter font things :) It is much better now. JMarc

Re: Feature request

24/04/2014 17:12, Pavel Sanda: Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you could strip from time to time unrelevant part of email exchanges you reply to ;) We have a problem with gmail users these days. Since gmail hides these long replies by default, people just

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 17:15:27, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > 24/04/2014 17:12, Pavel Sanda: > > Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you could > > strip > > from time to time unrelevant part of email exchanges you reply to ;) > > We

Re: Feature request

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 24/04/2014 17:12, Pavel Sanda: >> Not a problem, was just joking. What would be actually nice is if you >> could strip >> from time to time unrelevant part of email exchanges you reply to ;) > > We have a problem with gmail users these days. Since gmail hides these

Re: Feature request

Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 17:13:57, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > 24/04/2014 17:02, Kornel Benko: > >> I was not even aware of the html part. Cannot see, how to disable it from > >> inside kmail. > > > > I think, I found it. Test only. > > Oooh Kornel, I will miss

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We have a problem with gmail users these days. Since gmail hides these long > replies by default, people just let them in their messages... Maybe kmail > has the same feature. Another problem is that some

Re: Feature request

You might be right, but I think that ship has already sailed. -- Sean Patrick Burke > On Apr 24, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 um 14:31:54, schrieb Jean-Marc

Re: Feature request

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Another problem is that some mailing lists require/encourage "quote > prior messages in entirety" (e.g. It makes any longer exchange unreadable. I remember to delete few whole threads past few months without reading on this list because people were either lazy or not

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> Another problem is that some mailing lists require/encourage "quote >> prior messages in entirety" (e.g. > > It makes any longer exchange unreadable. Agreed. > When involved in the exchange I usually

Re: Feature request

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:53:07AM -0400, Sean Burke wrote: > You might be right, but I think that ship has already sailed. Yes, you cannot stop progress, apparently ;) -- Enrico A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting

Re: Feature request

> On Apr 24, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:53:07AM -0400, Sean Burke wrote: >> >> You might be right, but I think that ship has already sailed. > > Yes, you cannot stop progress, apparently ;) > > -- > Enrico > Ha ha ha. I can

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Stephan Witt wrote: > Sorry, you're wrong. My Mac comes with 2.7.2 and I have to install some > additional software package to use python 3. It's possible, but I don't > recommend to force users to do so. It's a hassle and I've heard of users > getting problems with software suddenly broken

Re: lyx2lyx bug

Richard Heck wrote: > This is close to right, but the problem is in the conversion of layouts. > It's fine not to quote the names. Look at e.g. logicalmkup.module. Mone > of the InsetLayout names are quoted, yet they work fine. The problem is > that there is some buggy conversion code, and it

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

On Apr 22, 2014 10:55 AM, "Benjamin Piwowarski" wrote: > > There is not much to do for python 3 compatibility, but still… I attached the patch this time. > > Benjamin I have one comment and one question regarding this patch. The comment: if we're only concerned with supporting

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Le 24/04/14 23:13, Josh Hieronymus a écrit : The comment: if we're only concerned with supporting Python 2.7 and up, we could include the statement "from __future__ import print_function" in any file in which we use the print function, as this allows us to use all of the features of the Python

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Mac OS 10.9 (Mavericks) has 2.7.5 installed. So we should keep 2.7.X compatibility. I think most people still use 2.7, as 3.X is relatively new (in terms of software maintenance/update cycles) and it takes considerable effort to switch a project over to 3.X. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

Am 25.04.2014 um 01:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 24/04/14 23:13, Josh Hieronymus a écrit : >> The comment: if we're only concerned with supporting Python 2.7 and up, >> we could include the statement "from __future__ import print_function" >> in any file in which we