The attachments on this thread have been posted to the wiki (thanks Christian):
http://wiki.lyx.org/Layouts/Modules/#toc7
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Modules/Sage
Note that if you customize the sage.module file, you can load the
changes immediately by entering "layout-reload" in the minibuffer.
John Carbone wrote:
> I wished for a way to just have "Requirement" in the Environment choice
> box and be able to cycle through the levels much like one can do with
> the sections, with the tab key. Since this feature didn't exist, I
> decided to implement it in a manner generic that I hope will b
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> I know how to do it otherwise but is there some simple merge command which
>> put the whole branch as a single commit into master without noticing
>> others
>> about the branch-history-mess in my local tree?
>
> (on branch master)
> $ git merge myfeature --squash
>
Op 2-4-2012 16:21, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
You had made local commits onto your master branch. If you then do 'git
pull'. It will fetch the commits from the master branch at the server and
merge them with your local commits.
Thanks for all you answers; started to push
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> You had made local commits onto your master branch. If you then do 'git
> pull'. It will fetch the commits from the master branch at the server and
> merge them with your local commits.
Thanks for all you answers; started to push things into wiki, so we don't
need
On 04/02/2012 05:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck
wrote:
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
2.0.4svn?
Why do you need one?
To show in the about box. Just so that
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm willing to edit the web pages after 2.0.3 is out, but now when I try to
> login nothing happens.
Please try now and report if something does not work.
Pavel
Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
2.0.4svn?
Why do you need one?
To show in the about box. Just so that people can give a name to the
thing, even though gi
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
> 2.0.4svn?
Why do you need one?
With git, tags are real tags and not branches as with svn. So I'd
recommend to keep developping in 2.0.x branch and tag it from time to
ti
Le 02/04/12 00:02, Richard Heck a écrit :
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
2.0.4svn?
2.0.4dev?
JMarc
10 matches
Mail list logo