LyX 2.1.0

At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left without further notice after sending his last e-mails, I've no clue on what translations

Re: LyX 2.1.0

08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left without further notice after sending his

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what exactly the best way to do it is. I think the attached patch is ready for 2.1.1-staging + 2.2-staging I don't know enough about the

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what exactly the best way to do it is. I think the attached patch

Re: LyX 2.1.0

08/04/2014 11:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I mean, Yes, please add me to the alias, and Yes, please forward the unprocessed messages. I did both now. JMarc

Re: LyX 2.1.0

I did both now. JMarc Thanks, Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1.0

2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: - Documents not compiling anymore because of BibTeX errors. We already received a lot of reports and this can prohibit people from updating. You can still decide to disable this feature (probably as easy as removing BIBTEX_ERROR from the

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014 um 11:38:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org Will commit then. This change effects naming of packages created with target 'package' or 'package_source' of cmake. Probably I am the only one using it? I don't expect any trouble, but even then, it

Re: Word to Lyx Converter

I wonder if a better approach would be to write a converter-agnostic script? So for example, the script searches for the usual converters - soffice, textutil, writer2latex, rtf2latex and then cobbles together a chain of formats to get to lyx? A script that was more flexible would work on more

Use InsertFileChild DocumentProgram Listing with Unicode encoded file

Hello, A thread on lyx-fr was raised on the suject: multi-byte characters are not supported in this situation. Among several workarounds, one is to convert the file to latin9 with iconv: I wonder if it could be possible for LyX to perform the iconv conversion on line. There is no problem with

Re: LyX 2.1.0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: You can still decide to disable this feature (probably as easy as removing BIBTEX_ERROR from the ERROR declaration in LaTeX.h:142). Fiddling with the feature itself makes no sense at this stage, IMHO. - If

Re: A small bug maybe and a small request

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2014-04-07 11:37 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: To slightly detail the response. The work-around is already in rc1 and that's probably the small w that is observed. There will be no change between 2.1.0 final and rc1. No, the small w is not the workaround. The

Re: [patch for 2.2] silence iconv warnings

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I am not very familiar with iconv/unicode and exception handling, so I would appreciate a critical review. The change in src/support/unicode.cpp is problematic: It disables all error handling, not only the lyxerr output. Also, if you now throw an exception there,

Re: Uninitialized member variables

Richard Heck wrote: I looked through most of this, except for the math bits, which I don't feel like I know enough about. There were only a few uninitialized variables that seemed to me an issue. But there were a couple problems that the script caught that seem real, and I've committed those

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 03.04.2014 22:12, schrieb Georg Baum: I understand your motivation to help people in developing countries (and I appreciate it), but please do not assume that your proposed solution of a particular problem is the only one which is feasible. Claiming that LyX supports a

Re: Figure 0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2014-04-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: The time you were the manager for 1.5/6.x I also many times upload test installers and you were aware of that. That time the main problem was that I did not had Vista and could not see if a problem that was only

Re: request to translate the documentation for LyX 2.1

Am 08.04.2014 11:48, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Why are you doing those things in private? Translators never respond to me, you have secret agreements with translators where they can grab the to-be-translated documents from, I don't see the majority of translations coming in, then I have

Re: Fwd: Windows uninstaller (v. 2.0.7-installer-1) deletes all icons at uninstall

Am 07.04.2014 14:13, schrieb Øyvind Sørbye: Sorry for not reporting back, I tested LyX-207-Installer-2.exe, it worked perfect, now I can install and uninstall unattended with the /S-switch, and all the other icons is still there in the Start Menu. But a forgot to report back :-( I tested

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 04.04.2014 08:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Sorry, but there is nothing about Urdu that we support (except an entry in the languages file), And with this we support hyphenations, automatic translations of words like figure etc. So as Jamil stated, the output is correct. What is not

Re: Figure 0

Am 04.04.2014 12:01, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: If you want to see something bad, you will always find something. It hurts me a lot that you see it like that. Why are you now that formalistic? Call it formalistic, if you wish. But please note that I am not the only one asking you for this.

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

Am 04.04.2014 13:47, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I do not see the need to raise a fundamental discussion about LyX 2.1 release at this point. Well, we only release a major version ever 2 - 3 years. So we should take the time to bring it to a shape that we can advertise it. For example if

Re: Last call for translations and layout translations review for LyX 2.1.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Dear translators, Vincent, most of the string in nl section seem to be translated, except of Listings - can you check? layouttranslations.review: nl: Acknowledgement, Case, Chart, (same translation as Graph) Claim, Condition, Conjecture, Corollary, Criterion,

LyX 2.1.0

At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left without further notice after sending his last e-mails, I've no clue on what translations

Re: LyX 2.1.0

08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left without further notice after sending his

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck > > > That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what > > > > > exactly the best > > > > > way to do it is. > > > > I think the attached patch is ready for 2.1.1-staging + 2.2-staging > > > > I don't

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. >> >> - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are >> going solely

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >>> At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. >>> >>>

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck > >> > > That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what > >> > > >> > > exactly the best > >> > > >> > > way to do it is. > >> >

Re: LyX 2.1.0

08/04/2014 11:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I mean, Yes, please add me to the alias, and Yes, please forward the unprocessed messages. I did both now. JMarc

Re: LyX 2.1.0

> I did both now. > > JMarc > Thanks, Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1.0

2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > - Documents not compiling anymore because of BibTeX errors. We already > received a lot of reports and this can prohibit people from updating. > You can still decide to disable this feature (probably as easy as removing BIBTEX_ERROR from the

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014 um 11:38:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > Will commit then. This change effects naming of packages created with target > > 'package' or 'package_source' of cmake. > > > > Probably I am the only one using it? > > > > I don't expect any trouble, but

Re: Word to Lyx Converter

I wonder if a better approach would be to write a converter-agnostic script? So for example, the script searches for the usual converters - soffice, textutil, writer2latex, rtf2latex and then cobbles together a chain of formats to get to lyx? A script that was more flexible would work on more

Use Insert>File>Child Document>Program Listing with Unicode encoded file

Hello, A thread on lyx-fr was raised on the suject: multi-byte characters are not supported in this situation. Among several workarounds, one is to convert the file to latin9 with iconv: I wonder if it could be possible for LyX to perform the iconv conversion on line. There is no problem with

Re: LyX 2.1.0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > You can still decide to disable this feature (probably as easy as removing > BIBTEX_ERROR from the ERROR declaration in LaTeX.h:142). Fiddling with the > feature itself makes no sense at this stage, IMHO. > > >>

Re: A small bug maybe and a small request

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-07 11:37 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> To slightly detail the response. The work-around is already in rc1 and >> that's probably the small w that is observed. There will be no change >> between 2.1.0 final and rc1. No, the small w is not the

Re: [patch for 2.2] silence iconv warnings

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I am not very familiar with iconv/unicode and exception handling, so I > would appreciate a critical review. The change in src/support/unicode.cpp is problematic: It disables all error handling, not only the lyxerr output. Also, if you now throw an exception there,

Re: Uninitialized member variables

Richard Heck wrote: > I looked through most of this, except for the math bits, which I don't > feel like I know enough about. There were only a few uninitialized > variables that seemed to me an issue. But there were a couple problems > that the script caught that seem real, and I've committed

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 03.04.2014 22:12, schrieb Georg Baum: > >> I understand your motivation to help people in developing countries (and >> I appreciate it), but please do not assume that your proposed solution of >> a particular problem is the only one which is feasible. Claiming that LyX >>

Re: Figure 0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr : > >> The time you were the manager for 1.5/6.x I also many times upload test >> installers and you were aware of that. That time the main problem was >> that I did not had Vista and could not see if a problem

Re: request to translate the documentation for LyX 2.1

Am 08.04.2014 11:48, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Why are you doing those things in private? Translators never respond to me, you have secret agreements with translators where they can grab the to-be-translated documents from, I don't see the majority of translations coming in, then I have

Re: Fwd: Windows uninstaller (v. 2.0.7-installer-1) deletes all icons at uninstall

Am 07.04.2014 14:13, schrieb Øyvind Sørbye: Sorry for not reporting back, I tested LyX-207-Installer-2.exe, it worked perfect, now I can install and uninstall unattended with the /S-switch, and all the other icons is still there in the Start Menu. But a forgot to report back :-( I tested

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 04.04.2014 08:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Sorry, but there is nothing about Urdu that we support (except an entry in the languages file), And with this we support hyphenations, automatic translations of words like "figure" etc. So as Jamil stated, the output is correct. What is

Re: Figure 0

Am 04.04.2014 12:01, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: If you want to see something bad, you will always find something. It hurts me a lot that you see it like that. Why are you now that formalistic? Call it formalistic, if you wish. But please note that I am not the only one asking you for this.

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

Am 04.04.2014 13:47, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I do not see the need to raise a fundamental discussion about LyX 2.1 release at this point. Well, we only release a major version ever 2 - 3 years. So we should take the time to bring it to a shape that we can advertise it. For example if

Re: Last call for translations and layout translations review for LyX 2.1.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Dear translators, Vincent, most of the string in nl section seem to be translated, except of Listings - can you check? layouttranslations.review: nl: "Acknowledgement", "Case", "Chart", (same translation as "Graph") "Claim", "Condition", "Conjecture",