Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file - full patch

On 10/26/2015 07:42 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 26.10.2015 um 03:50 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: The attached patch adds support for the modernCV features introduced by version 1.5 from April 2013. Attached is not the complete patch including lyx2lyx and I hope it addresses the tex2lyx tests as well. If

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

On 10/26/2015 05:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:56:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It might be worth renaming the old layout to moderncv-14.layout or something, in case people don't have the new version. This seems like a good idea to me. And then we could expire the o

Re: #9785: lstinline in footnotes

Am 27.10.2015 um 01:40 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: If you want a proper fix, then we must automatically add the "inline" option if a listings inset is placed into a footnote or margin note. Hmm, this is no proper fix, since the user could remove the inline option later on. He might have done hundred o

Re: #9785: lstinline in footnotes

Am 26.10.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Guillaume Munch: The user reported two valid use cases that are exceptions to this behaviour: \lstinline and \usepackage{bigfoot}. This used to work before ⇒ regression. As I wrote, I don't agree. We had a valid bug report where a user put a listings inset in a

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

Am 26.10.2015 um 22:42 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I see. It would be nice to have a rule so we don't have to have the same discussion multiple times. We could add such a rule to Development.lyx. Very good! Today I searched the mailing list about this topic but I am only good on searching, not o

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

Am 26.10.2015 um 16:51 schrieb Stephan Witt: You missed the "Change to the build-directory." part of Kornels advice. I think "D:\LyXGit\Master\lib\examples" isn't your build directory or at least it shouldn't be so. Thanks for this pointer. This works somehow but I still don't see if a test

Re: status update on the export tests

Am 26.10.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 11:43:07, schrieb Stephan Witt > >> Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko : >> >>> They are started, because otherwise you would not see 'out of 199'. >>> What was your exact test command? >> >> This is the co

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file - full patch

Am 26.10.2015 um 03:50 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: The attached patch adds support for the modernCV features introduced by version 1.5 from April 2013. Attached is not the complete patch including lyx2lyx and I hope it addresses the tex2lyx tests as well. If nobody sees a problem with this, I would

Re: Changebar module file

Guillaume Munch lyx.org> writes: > > I see three propositions in this message: > > 1- Having it done natively by LyX instead of using a module. > 2- Having it enabled or disabled according to an option in the > preferences/menu. > 3- Fixing your LaTeX code so that it works for XeTeX. > > 1-

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:31:49PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-10-23, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:10:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> >> On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:56:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/26/2015 01:31 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:50:43AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >>The attached patch adds support for the modernCV features introduced by > >>version 1.5 from April 2013. > >> > >>I think

Re: status update on the export tests

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > OK. Do you agree that this is not a blocker for alpha? Yes. Georg

Re: status update on the export tests

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:40:06PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These > > tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents > > that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x suddenly fail

Re: #9785: lstinline in footnotes

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Dear Uwe, > >> Keywords regression removed >> Status changed from assigned to closed >> Resolution set to wontfix >> Milestone 2.2.0 deleted >> >> >> I don't think that we should support things that break compilation >> with the default settings. > > Then maybe have list

Re: status update on the export tests

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These > tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents > that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x suddenly fail to compile > with LyX 2.2.0 because of edd37de8. In this sense, there

Re: [LyX/master] colored-boxes.lyx: new example file for the tcolorbox.module

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Op 25-10-2015 om 22:12 schreef Uwe Stöhr: >> Am 25.10.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Georg Baum: >> >>> And if something is wrong with them, we should invest the time and >>> improve >>> our formatted references support, instead of fiddling with the premable. >> >> I set up

Re: Many tex2lyx failing now on master

When I try to compile this file via the console or directly in MSVC I get always this error: Building Custom Rule D:/LyXGit/Master/src/tex2lyx/test/CMakeLists.txt CMake does not need to re-run because D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-result\src\tex2lyx\test\CMakeFiles\generate.stamp is up-to-date.

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 26.10.2015 um 06:31 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >>> I think it is safe enough to support 2 years old features and would >>> therefore like to put it in. >> >> Do we have any policy on this? What have we done in the past? > > No strict one, but the feature should be at least

Re: [LyX/master] Revert the box alignment part of 8010b90c

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 25.10.2015 um 11:05 schrieb Georg Baum: > >> I reverted to get rid of a regression you introduced. If you want more >> details, please read the commit log and the thread I referred to in the >> commit log, since we discussed the possible alternatives in detail over >> the la

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

On 10/26/2015 01:31 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:50:43AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: The attached patch adds support for the modernCV features introduced by version 1.5 from April 2013. I think it is safe enough to support 2 years old features and would therefore like to pu

Re: callgrind

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 04:50:47PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > I have added instructions for using callgrind here: > . It records function calls and > lets you explore them hierarchically. > > I found callgrind very useful for understanding how LyX

callgrind

I have added instructions for using callgrind here: . It records function calls and lets you explore them hierarchically. I found callgrind very useful for understanding how LyX works, not just for profiling. Unlike other profilers, it works without

Re: [patch] support Khmer language

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:22:38PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 26.10.2015 um 02:23 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > >polyglossia supports the Khmer (Cambodian) language. LyX can therefore > >support this language too easily. > > > >OK to go on? > > No, because I see that the feature is brand new and not in t

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:12:32AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 01:53:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Scott, could you please test if this fixes some more export tests? > > > > Thanks for askin

#9785: lstinline in footnotes

Dear Uwe, Keywords regression removed Status changed from assigned to closed Resolution set to wontfix Milestone 2.2.0 deleted I don't see a regression here. The point is that users insert listings via the LyX menu or a shortcut. This inserts a lstlisting environment that will not compile whe

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

Am 26.10.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Uwe Stöhr : > Am 26.10.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >>> I cannot find a command ctest to execute. How can or should I execute it? >> >> We have explained you this more than 2.5 years ago (see the link below). > > Sorry but no, you did not. The c

Re: status update on the export tests

On 2015-10-26, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: ... >> Could this prevent some of the regressions? (We need to look carefully, not >> only if the relevant documents compile without error, but also if the >> ex

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

Am 26.10.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: I cannot find a command ctest to execute. How can or should I execute it? We have explained you this more than 2.5 years ago (see the link below). Sorry but no, you did not. The cited mail does not explain how th tests are run. Of cours

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

Op 26 okt. 2015 14:10 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" : > > Am 26.10.2015 um 06:31 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >>> I think it is safe enough to support 2 years old features and would >>> therefore like to put it in. >> >> >> Do we have any policy on this? What have we done in the past? > > > No strict one, but

Re: [patch] support Khmer language

Am 26.10.2015 um 02:23 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: polyglossia supports the Khmer (Cambodian) language. LyX can therefore support this language too easily. OK to go on? No, because I see that the feature is brand new and not in the current TeXLive. I therefore opened http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/98

Re: [LyX/master] Revert the box alignment part of 8010b90c

Am 26.10.2015 um 06:26 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Well, of course I read the thread carefully I do not understand the "of course". I sent you four direct emails regarding a regression. I read them "of course" now ;-) The point is that I don't see the regression. There was a lyx2yx bug OK. Ye

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

Am 26.10.2015 um 06:31 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I think it is safe enough to support 2 years old features and would therefore like to put it in. Do we have any policy on this? What have we done in the past? No strict one, but the feature should be at least in the current and previous TeXLiv

Re: [LyX/master] colored-boxes.lyx: new example file for the tcolorbox.module

Am 26.10.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Did I get that right? While looking at alternatives, what about cleveref? I don't know cleveref. I just ready section 3 of the cleveref manual where he compared the different referencing features: http://mirror.unicorncloud.org/CTAN/macros/latex/co

Re: [LyX/master] colored-boxes.lyx: new example file for the tcolorbox.module

Am 26.10.2015 um 11:05 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 26/10/2015 00:36, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : It does not what \autoref does. Could you expand a bit? I already wrote what \autoref does. Attached is an example file. So, to summarize what I understood: * autoref, prettyref and autoref actual

Re: [LyX/master] Fix export with polyglossia and uninvert a manual

Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 10:59:05, schrieb Guenter Milde > BTW: what does the term "invert/revert" mean in the autotest context? Essentially the same: The test is (for now) expected to fail, so that it does not appear in the list of failed tests. If the test fails, it means that in the m

Re: status update on the export tests

Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 11:43:07, schrieb Stephan Witt > Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 09:13:44, schrieb Stephan Witt > > > > ... > >>> These tests fails because of language switching done with polyglossia, > >>> but I'm not sure what

Re: [LyX/master] Fix export with polyglossia and uninvert a manual

On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:17:15AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > -% increase link area for cross-references and autoname them, >> > -\AtBeginDocument{\renewcommand{\ref}[1]{\mbox{\autoref{#1 >> > -\addto\extrasfrench{% >> > - \r

Re: status update on the export tests

Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 09:13:44, schrieb Stephan Witt > > ... >>> These tests fails because of language switching done with polyglossia, but >>> I'm not sure what the root problem is: >>> export/doc/fr/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF >>> export/exa

Re: status update on the export tests

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These >> tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents >> that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x sudden

Re: [LyX/master] colored-boxes.lyx: new example file for the tcolorbox.module

Le 26/10/2015 00:36, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : It does not what \autoref does. Could you expand a bit? I already wrote what \autoref does. Attached is an example file. So, to summarize what I understood: * autoref, prettyref and autoref actually do the same thing * you do not like prettyref; fro

Re: status update on the export tests

On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These > tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents > that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x suddenly fail to compile > with LyX 2.2.0 because of edd37de8. In th

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 01:53:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 um 11:31:09, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > > > On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote: > > > > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > > > > >> I'll commi

Re: status update on the export tests

Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 09:13:44, schrieb Stephan Witt ... > > These tests fails because of language switching done with polyglossia, but > > I'm not sure what the root problem is: > > export/doc/fr/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF > > export/examples/fr/Foils_pdf5_systemF > > # kluwer gives the fol

Re: status update on the export tests

Am 25.10.2015 um 05:29 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > Dear all, > > There seems to be more interest in running the export tests. This is great and > will encourage me to improve the (shamefully lacking) documentation for these > tests. > > First, I am focusing on the test results after reverting (l