Le 30/08/2016 à 21:12, Georg Baum a écrit :
Guillaume Munch wrote:
* Why ascii_num_get_facet::do_get uses from_local8bit at some
point.
The encoding does not matter here: Our own numpunct_facet does not
override truename() and falsename(), so std::numpunct::truename() and
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> I made it work with libc++ too, which was not straightforward. In this
> case, the template is undefined and cannot be inherited from.
>
> Could you or somebody else please double-check the following, which I am
> not sure to understand correctly:
>
> * Why
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 30/08/2016 à 16:55, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > OK I pushed at 03684ae0. I wonder if the misunderstanding comes back to
> > what we agreed on before, which is that it is weird that both
> >
> > buffer-zoom-in 4
> >
Le 30/08/2016 à 16:55, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
OK I pushed at 03684ae0. I wonder if the misunderstanding comes back to
what we agreed on before, which is that it is weird that both
buffer-zoom-in 4
buffer-zoom-out 4
have the same behavior.
No, it probably come from my laziness about
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:41:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 30/08/2016 à 16:36, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > It would go down to 10%, both with my patch and without it.
>
> It is OK, then.
>
> Do what you think is best.
OK I pushed at 03684ae0. I wonder if the misunderstanding
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 30/08/2016 à 03:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On current master, if zoom is at 10% and you run
> >
> > buffer-zoom-in -1
> >
> > then the LFUN is not disabled and status shows:
> >
> > Zoom level is now 10%
On 30.08.2016 14:58, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 30/08/2016 à 12:52, racoon a écrit :
Say you have a passage with a lot of tracked changes. Now, however, you
would like to "comment it out" with a LyX note. Surely, you don't want
to loose the changes made but keep them for later evaluation.
+1
Le 30/08/2016 à 12:52, racoon a écrit :
Say you have a passage with a lot of tracked changes. Now, however, you
would like to "comment it out" with a LyX note. Surely, you don't want
to loose the changes made but keep them for later evaluation.
+1
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10244
On 30.08.2016 11:06, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2016 um 10:40:55, schrieb racoon
Hi,
I am wondering whether this is on purpose or not:
1. Enable Track Changes
2. Enter some text
3. Disable Track Changes
4. Select the text
5. Insert an inset, e.g. a LyX note
Le 30/08/2016 à 03:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On current master, if zoom is at 10% and you run
buffer-zoom-in -1
then the LFUN is not disabled and status shows:
Zoom level is now 10% (buffer-zoom-in -1)
With my patch, I think the LFUN is disabled and status shows the same as
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2016 um 10:40:55, schrieb racoon
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering whether this is on purpose or not:
>
> 1. Enable Track Changes
> 2. Enter some text
> 3. Disable Track Changes
> 4. Select the text
> 5. Insert an inset, e.g. a LyX note
>
> Result:
> - The
Hi,
I am wondering whether this is on purpose or not:
1. Enable Track Changes
2. Enter some text
3. Disable Track Changes
4. Select the text
5. Insert an inset, e.g. a LyX note
Result:
- The tracked changes are removed
Isn't it more intuitive to leave the changes as they are? After all I am
12 matches
Mail list logo