After having fully removed all registry and preference files it suddenly
works.
On 05.08.2016 20:02, racoon wrote:
Finally, I need to get LaTeX running for my compilations. At the moment
the "View", etc. is grayed out. I figured that I need to run
Reconfigure. The log is below. I guess a
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:30:25PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I plan to soon propose to change the default of the working directory to
> '.', as this thread originally started out as. I would like to test a
> bit and take a look at where else that path is used besides creating a
> new file.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:46:46AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 24.09.2016 um 17:49 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > I propose to change the rule to:
> >
> > 4. You MUST assure that the document is compilable as "PDF (pdflatex)"
> > or the document's default output format.
>
> Sure, makes
Am 24.09.2016 um 17:49 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I propose to change the rule to:
4. You MUST assure that the document is compilable as "PDF (pdflatex)"
or the document's default output format.
Sure, makes obviously sense.
I put this in.
regards Uwe
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 01:00:50AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 09/10/2016 17:12, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Great, thanks! It might be nice to have a Wiki page for this.
>
> now we have
> http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXChat#sDevel.LyXChat_8
>
> I also merged the proposal into this page
Hi Richard,
I remember that you wanted to release it end of September? What is the
new plan?
thanks and regards
Uwe
On 09/10/2016 17:12, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Great, thanks! It might be nice to have a Wiki page for this.
now we have
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXChat#sDevel.LyXChat_8
I also merged the proposal into this page on ideas for collaborative extensions:
Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 17:55:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:28:47PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > > Good idea. Assuming we do not have many inverted tests that would keep
> > > the file size of the
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 11:35:26PM +0200, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> I now get the following with gcc 4.6:
>
> ../../../../src/frontends/qt4/GuiView.h:467:33: sorry, unimplemented:
> non-static data member initializers
>
> Your code is fine, this is just gcc 4.6 not supporting a C++11 feature.
>
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:33:42PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:45:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> Yes. It is good to make the documents "robust", but not if this
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:28:47PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Good idea. Assuming we do not have many inverted tests that would keep
> > the file size of the log down. Günter, do you want the log output for
> > the non-inverted tests also?
>
>
Le 09/10/2016 à 23:26, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 05:21:03PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I just pushed a commit but I forgot to append the underscore. I'll fix
that now.
Committed at 168d3557 and amended at 5fd21db9.
Scott
I now get the following with gcc 4.6:
On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:45:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
...
>> Yes. It is good to make the documents "robust", but not if this stands in
>> the way with the main purpose: documentation.
> +1
>> Example:
>>
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:24:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually inspect the
> > output of all of the exports.
>
> There is no need to test *all* exports, just the default (i.e. pdf2) and
> only
On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 07:46:24PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 19:21:57, schrieb Kornel Benko
>>
>> > Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 12:38:44, schrieb
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 05:21:03PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I just pushed a commit but I forgot to append the underscore. I'll fix
> that now.
Committed at 168d3557 and amended at 5fd21db9.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --]
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:50:35PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> * Changes must not only tested for compilation success but also for correct
>> output.
> I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 07:24:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:09:54AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:02:17AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:41:25PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >
> > > > The
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 08:18:37PM +0200, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 09/10/2016 à 19:51, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
> > commit cf26d53e037cf59b5816cdb2f5c7d835b83d480a
> > Author: Daniel Ramöller
> > Date: Mon Oct 3 20:20:16 2016 +0200
> >
> > Remove question marks from
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 07:46:24PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 19:21:57, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 12:38:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > Is it possible to show the -dbg output only when there
Le 09/10/2016 à 19:51, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
commit cf26d53e037cf59b5816cdb2f5c7d835b83d480a
Author: Daniel Ramöller
Date: Mon Oct 3 20:20:16 2016 +0200
Remove question marks from Windows dialogs
Welcome to the project!
Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 19:21:57, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 12:38:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > When encountering a ctest failure, we must run the test manually to see
> > what the LaTeX error. It would be nice to be able
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:09:54AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:02:17AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:41:25PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > The attached patch is simple but I have not made a change like this
> > > before so
Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 um 12:38:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> When encountering a ctest failure, we must run the test manually to see
> what the LaTeX error. It would be nice to be able to see the LaTeX error
> from the ctest logs. The following tickets are related:
>
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:50:35PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> * Changes must not only tested for compilation success but also for correct
> output.
I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually inspect the
output of all of the exports.
> That said, I am not against the proposed
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:45:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Two points that were agreed with Uwe:
>
> * The manuals in lib/doc are designed for output with pdflatex and TeX
> fonts and only this export is secure.
>
> To make this clear, the
On 2016-10-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --]
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 08:17:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I don't know whether this is the intention here, but I would give Uwe as
>> maintainer the say about the correct settings.
> OK, I CC'ed Uwe. I won't
On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:36:47PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>> Le 08/10/2016 à 19:10, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> Right, now I get onle the three systemF failures due to the
>> Missing character: There is no ✗ in font
>>
When encountering a ctest failure, we must run the test manually to see
what the LaTeX error. It would be nice to be able to see the LaTeX error
from the ctest logs. The following tickets are related:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9931
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9866
One possibility would be
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:04:15PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> BTW: if "--debug latex" prints the latex error, shouldn't the test script
> make the latex export calls with this setting?
I will start a new email thread for this.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2016-10-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've setup the test machinery on my Debian Jessie, TeXLive 2016:
>> * ran automake in /ext/lyx/master
>> * ran
On 2016-10-09, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 09/10/2016 à 02:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 01:53:06PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> I still get an error for
>>> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols-utf8_pdf2 (Failed)
>>> Does it pass for you?
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 12:20:44PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 09/10/2016 01:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Is there any documentation for it?
>
> for now, it's all here:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964
>
> quick start guide, compile:
>
> 1. recompile qxmpp from sources
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:36:47PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 08/10/2016 à 19:10, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
> >
> > This has to do with whether the "Default output format" is set.
> > If I set it back to "default", and rerun cmake and then rerun the tests,
> > then all of the
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:27:33PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Is it correct just ta make in the cbuildmaster dir after git pull ?
It depends. In many cases that is enough. But if something changed in
e.g. ignoredTests or invertedTests, then you need to run cmake again.
You don't have
Le 08/10/2016 à 19:10, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
This has to do with whether the "Default output format" is set.
If I set it back to "default", and rerun cmake and then rerun the tests,
then all of the tests pass. This makes me think we should change the
format back to default. Günter do you
Le 09/10/2016 à 02:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 01:53:06PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I still get an error for
export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols-utf8_pdf2 (Failed)
Does it pass for you?
The error I get is:
! Package inputenc Error: Unicode
On 09/10/2016 01:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Is there any documentation for it?
for now, it's all here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964
quick start guide, compile:
1. recompile qxmpp from sources available at:
http://retis.sssup.it/~tommaso/qxmpp
(or install straight the .deb
38 matches
Mail list logo