Am 05.04.2018 um 04:47 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
In my opinion it is that important, because updating LyX could break
something else on a user's computer.
No! Why do you claim this again? Don't mix potential bugs in a LaTeX
package on CTAN with LyX. With this argumentation every package update
Am 05.04.2018 um 03:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
It is not true that people don't trust you, and it really isn't helpful
to phrase it that way. This is not an issue of expertise, experience, or
anythinng of that sort. It's a judgement call about what to do in what
is obviously a difficult s
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 07:16:41AM +, R H van der Gaag wrote:
> Hi, I’ll be glad to, but what would qualify as an ‘example file’?
> H.
In this case, it would be a minimal .lyx file and a .bib file (if
necessary), along with steps to reproduce (e.g. 1. compile, 2. go to
Document > Settings > Bi
2018-04-04 20:24 GMT+02:00 Richard Kimberly Heck:
> If you think it is safe enough for that, then go ahead.
>
I've done that. Thanks.
Jürgen
>
> Riki
>
>
Le 05/04/2018 à 04:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:36:26PM +, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Comments welcome.
Tested and works well! I actually wasn't very hopeful that someone would
make a patch when I posted this issue. I am glad to be surprised.
Thank you for yo
Le 05/04/2018 à 04:58, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
What do we use instead now? I'm trying to update an old patch of
Georg's for bug 7474, and it uses boost::shared_ptr.
Riki
Using "git log -Sscoped_ptr", I find
commit ca8709aaf5f5f14aae1978403e13aac3a93506aa
Author: Guillaume Munch
Date
Hi, I’ll be glad to, but what would qualify as an ‘example file’?
H.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 02:53:22PM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 18.03.2018, 14:47 +0100 schrieb R H van der Gaag:
> > Also, I found that simply switching
