On 03/01/2011 09:31, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
First, there are two different types of settings of toolbars: the
location of the toolbars, and the visibility of the toolbars. The
former is managed by Qt in QMainWindow::saveState()/restoreState().
The latter is done by LyX in
On 03/01/2011 09:43, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
What I forgot to say is: Why don't we implement saveState() and
restoreState() in GuiToolbar which overrides QToolbar::saveState() and
restoreState(). Then restoring the visibility of the toolbars is done
by QMainWindow::restoreState. (At least,
On 01/03/2011 09:26 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Furthermore, I'm not sure yet what causes the bug, because it seems
that if the user sets the toolbar visibility from within LyX, this
setting is lost again on the new start-up of LyX. Why are the settings
not stored properly when exiting LyX
On 01/03/2011 02:03 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Furthermore, I'm not sure yet what causes the bug, because it seems
that if the user sets the toolbar visibility from within LyX, this
setting is lost again on the new start-up of LyX. Why are the settings
not stored properly when exiting LyX
On 12/21/2010 09:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 21/12/2010 00:02, Richard Heck a écrit :
I guess the idea was that greyed out notes get the same status for
instance as deleted text when change tracking is on. In that case, you
don't want the counters to be treated as part of the
On 12/20/2010 02:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I don't think this could happen but yes, better safe than sorry :-)
dunno how much is this related to the last changes but is see new assert
in bugzilla with lyx::RandomAccessListlyx::Paragraph::operator[] keyword
On 12/21/2010 09:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 21/12/2010 00:02, Richard Heck a écrit :
I guess the idea was that greyed out notes get the same status for
instance as deleted text when change tracking is on. In that case, you
don't want the counters to be treated as part of the
On 12/20/2010 02:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I don't think this could happen but yes, better safe than sorry :-)
dunno how much is this related to the last changes but is see new assert
in bugzilla with lyx::RandomAccessList::operator[] keyword...
#7188
On 18/12/2010 22:03, Bernhard Roider wrote:
2010/12/18 Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org mailto:you...@lyx.org
On 18/12/2010 19:33, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 19:08, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 18/12/2010 18:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote
On 16/12/2010 12:02, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 15. des. 2010 14:50, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/15/2010 08:43 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
How about defining custom Insets instead of styles? This would put the
new objects in a less prominent place (i.e. not interfering with the
normal styles), clearly
I created a new branch for that in git:
http://gitorious.org/lyx/lyx/commits/toolbar-settings
Abdel.
On 15/12/2010 00:20, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
This is an old promise of mines. This an attempt to get rid of the
menubased toolbar-switching and the tristate toggling.
The patch
On 12/20/2010 02:37 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/19/2010 05:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
CXXoutput_xhtml.o
output_latex.cpp: In function 'void lyx::TeXOnePar(const
lyx::Buffer, const lyx::Text, lyx::pit_type, lyx::odocstream,
lyx::TexRow, const lyx::OutputParams, const std::string,
On 18/12/2010 22:03, Bernhard Roider wrote:
2010/12/18 Abdelrazak Younes <you...@lyx.org <mailto:you...@lyx.org>>
On 18/12/2010 19:33, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 19:08, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 18/12/2010 18:57, Jean-Marc Lasg
On 16/12/2010 12:02, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 15. des. 2010 14:50, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/15/2010 08:43 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
How about defining custom Insets instead of styles? This would put the
new objects in a less prominent place (i.e. not interfering with the
"normal" styles),
I created a new branch for that in git:
http://gitorious.org/lyx/lyx/commits/toolbar-settings
Abdel.
On 15/12/2010 00:20, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
This is an old promise of mines. This an attempt to get rid of the
menubased toolbar-switching and the tristate toggling.
The patch
On 12/20/2010 02:37 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/19/2010 05:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
CXXoutput_xhtml.o
output_latex.cpp: In function 'void lyx::TeXOnePar(const
lyx::Buffer&, const lyx::Text&, lyx::pit_type, lyx::odocstream&,
lyx::TexRow&, const lyx::OutputParams&, const
On 18/12/2010 17:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 09:22, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
OK, I just committed a fix then. Please try it.
On a release build on trunk, for exporting to pdflatex format I get
before: 220 seconds
after: 21 seconds
No diff between the two files
On 18/12/2010 18:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 17:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
What part of that could possibly go to branch?
I guess introducing RandomListAccess::position() and using it will be enough.
Why does this remove the quadratic behaviour?
distance(it1, it2
On 18/12/2010 19:33, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 19:08, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 18/12/2010 18:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 17:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
What part of that could possibly go to branch?
I guess introducing RandomListAccess
OK, within msysgit that gives:
$ git clone g...@gitorious.org:lyx/lyx.git
$ cd lyx
$ git svn init svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/ -T trunk -b branches -t tags
Using higher level of URL: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel =
svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx
$ cp .git/refs/heads/master
On 18/12/2010 17:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 09:22, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
OK, I just committed a fix then. Please try it.
On a release build on trunk, for exporting to pdflatex format I get
before: 220 seconds
after: 21 seconds
No diff between the two files
On 18/12/2010 18:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 17:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
What part of that could possibly go to branch?
I guess introducing RandomListAccess::position() and using it will be enough.
Why does this remove the quadratic behaviour?
distance(it1, it2
On 18/12/2010 19:33, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 19:08, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 18/12/2010 18:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18 déc. 2010 à 17:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
What part of that could possibly go to branch?
I guess introducing RandomListAccess
OK, within msysgit that gives:
$ git clone g...@gitorious.org:lyx/lyx.git
$ cd lyx
$ git svn init svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/ -T trunk -b branches -t tags
Using higher level of URL: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel =>
svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx
$ cp .git/refs/heads/master
On 12/17/2010 03:33 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/16/10 9:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
unless there are some objections i will commit it. once in we'll see
whether
the new behaviour does not irritate the second half of people which
has no
performance problems...
I have another patch in the
On 12/17/2010 01:05 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Pavel Sandasa...@lyx.org wrote:
hi,
the attached patch has profound impact on the speed of moving with cursor
and typing as well. at least here.
if you wonder how to reproduce the slowness problems on
On 12/17/2010 04:19 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we shouldn't fall back into this kind of hack before we know
i can offer some rc variable or small slider for the delay in outliner.
if its not acceptable either, well, its another local patch again :)
On 12/17/2010 04:50 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 16/12/2010 21:46, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal
On 12/17/2010 05:41 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 17/12/2010 17:17, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Anyway, I tested this change and the UserGuide exports correctly (and
identically of course). But the bad news is that it make no difference
in speed. So my conclusion is that the speed issue
On 12/17/2010 05:42 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
+// Enable if you dont want the delaying business, cf #7138.
+#ifdef 0
+ updateViewForce();
+ return;
+#endif
erm #if 0 of course...
make it an #ifndef DELAY_UPDATE_VIEW and I'd be happy.
Abdel.
pavel
On 17/12/2010 18:18, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
erm #if 0 of course...
make it an #ifndef DELAY_UPDATE_VIEW and I'd be happy.
this means the bug remains effectively unfixed for all other users.
No, you can of course set that to 1 by default of course (like
On 12/17/2010 03:33 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/16/10 9:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
unless there are some objections i will commit it. once in we'll see
whether
the new behaviour does not irritate the second half of people which
has no
performance problems...
I have another patch in the
On 12/17/2010 01:05 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
the attached patch has profound impact on the speed of moving with cursor
and typing as well. at least here.
if you wonder how to reproduce the slowness problems
On 12/17/2010 04:19 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we shouldn't fall back into this kind of hack before we know
i can offer some rc variable or small slider for the delay in outliner.
if its not acceptable either, well, its another local patch again :)
On 12/17/2010 04:50 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 16/12/2010 21:46, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal
On 12/17/2010 05:41 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 17/12/2010 17:17, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Anyway, I tested this change and the UserGuide exports correctly (and
identically of course). But the bad news is that it make no difference
in speed. So my conclusion is that the speed issue
On 12/17/2010 05:42 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
+// Enable if you dont want the delaying business, cf #7138.
+#ifdef 0
+ updateViewForce();
+ return;
+#endif
erm "#if 0" of course...
make it an #ifndef DELAY_UPDATE_VIEW and I'd be happy.
Abdel.
On 17/12/2010 18:18, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
erm "#if 0" of course...
make it an #ifndef DELAY_UPDATE_VIEW and I'd be happy.
this means the bug remains effectively unfixed for all other users.
No, you can of course set that to 1 by default of co
On 12/16/2010 03:43 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
the attached patch has profound impact on the speed of moving with cursor
and typing as well. at least here.
if you wonder how to reproduce the slowness problems on your box, try to open
user guide, set the nesting on deepest level and try to type
On 12/16/2010 07:25 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 16.12.2010 um 00:44 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
Index: src/frontends/Clipboard.h
===
--- src/frontends/Clipboard.h (Revision 36891)
+++
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal customers need to tweak any of the outputs.
The ones who would be doing the editing are less than
On 12/16/2010 03:43 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
the attached patch has profound impact on the speed of moving with cursor
and typing as well. at least here.
if you wonder how to reproduce the slowness problems on your box, try to open
user guide, set the nesting on deepest level and try to type
On 12/16/2010 07:25 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 16.12.2010 um 00:44 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
Index: src/frontends/Clipboard.h
===
--- src/frontends/Clipboard.h (Revision 36891)
+++
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal customers need to "tweak" any of the outputs.
The ones who would be doing the editing are less than
Hi Vincent,
I would like to create a new branch there for my toolbar-settings patch
but the repo is not up to date. As I am not familiar with git svn could
you please send your recipe to rebase git master from svn trunk?
Thanks in advance,
Abdel.
On 15/12/2010 18:51, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal customers need to tweak any of the
outputs.
The ones
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal customers need to tweak any of the outputs.
The ones who would be doing the editing are less than
On 15/12/2010 18:57, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Abdelrazak Younesyou...@lyx.org wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I would like to create a new branch there for my toolbar-settings patch but
the repo is not up to date. As I am not familiar with git svn could you
please
On 15/12/2010 23:02, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:48 PM,you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Wed Dec 15 22:48:00 2010
New Revision: 36895
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36895
Log:
get rid of TeXDeeper: this was hiding the recursiveness of
On 15/12/2010 23:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 18:51, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
It seems correct. At the time I remember saying to myself that using
std::distance was not optimal and that we should use some new fast
method in RandomAccessList but I did not bother because
On 16/12/2010 00:39, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Thu Dec 16 00:39:38 2010
New Revision: 36896
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36896
Log:
Split TeXEnvironment() in three functions. The real optimisation is yet to come.
Pavel, I should have probably requested your approval
Hi Vincent,
I would like to create a new branch there for my toolbar-settings patch
but the repo is not up to date. As I am not familiar with git svn could
you please send your recipe to rebase git master from svn trunk?
Thanks in advance,
Abdel.
On 15/12/2010 18:51, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal customers need to "tweak" any of th
On 15/12/2010 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 17:54, Michael Joyner a écrit :
One of our initial goals was to try and maintain an easy to edit file
format should the internal customers need to "tweak" any of the outputs.
The ones who would be doing the editing are less than
On 15/12/2010 18:57, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Abdelrazak Younes<you...@lyx.org> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I would like to create a new branch there for my toolbar-settings patch but
the repo is not up to date. As I am not familiar with git svn could you
On 15/12/2010 23:02, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:48 PM, wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Wed Dec 15 22:48:00 2010
New Revision: 36895
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36895
Log:
get rid of TeXDeeper: this was hiding the recursiveness of
On 15/12/2010 23:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/12/2010 18:51, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
It seems correct. At the time I remember saying to myself that using
std::distance was not optimal and that we should use some new fast
method in RandomAccessList but I did not bother because
On 16/12/2010 00:39, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Thu Dec 16 00:39:38 2010
New Revision: 36896
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36896
Log:
Split TeXEnvironment() in three functions. The real optimisation is yet to come.
Pavel, I should have probably requested your approval
On 13/12/2010 22:04, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-12-13, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 13. des. 2010 13:16, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 23. sep. 2010 03:50, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The only disadvantage being that the module will now add 18 new
paragraph types instead of 6 (or 12).
On 14/12/2010 12:09, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 13/12/2010 22:04, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-12-13, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 13. des. 2010 13:16, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 23. sep. 2010 03:50, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The only disadvantage being that the module will now add 18 new
paragraph types
Hi Richard,
Would it be possible to add a new item in the layout syntax to require a
specific document settings? Something like:
RequiredSettingsetting:value
In the case of the header and footer module that would give the
attached. The goal is of course to automatically set the setting
On 15/12/2010 00:16, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Wed Dec 15 00:16:19 2010
New Revision: 36884
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36884
Log:
Allow customization of label string for note insets. We actually had
strings in the layout file, but they were not used.
Question:
On 14/12/2010 15:42, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/14/2010 06:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi Richard,
Would it be possible to add a new item in the layout syntax to
require a specific document settings? Something like:
RequiredSettingsetting:value
In the case of the header and footer
On 13/12/2010 22:04, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-12-13, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 13. des. 2010 13:16, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 23. sep. 2010 03:50, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The only disadvantage being that the module will now add 18 new
paragraph types instead of 6 (or 12).
On 14/12/2010 12:09, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 13/12/2010 22:04, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-12-13, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 13. des. 2010 13:16, Helge Hafting wrote:
On 23. sep. 2010 03:50, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The only disadvantage being that the module will now add 18 new
paragraph types
Hi Richard,
Would it be possible to add a new item in the layout syntax to require a
specific document settings? Something like:
RequiredSettingsetting:value
In the case of the header and footer module that would give the
attached. The goal is of course to automatically set the setting
On 15/12/2010 00:16, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Wed Dec 15 00:16:19 2010
New Revision: 36884
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36884
Log:
Allow customization of label string for note insets. We actually had
strings in the layout file, but they were not used.
Question:
On 14/12/2010 15:42, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/14/2010 06:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi Richard,
Would it be possible to add a new item in the layout syntax to
require a specific document settings? Something like:
RequiredSettingsetting:value
In the case of the header and footer
On 12/08/2010 02:45 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
While you're at this, I wonder if you have a relatively easy fix for this
bug. Add a character to a document, then go to the end of the document. Now
do Undo, Redo. The redo moves you to the end of the document, so you don't
actually see what
On 12/08/2010 05:11 PM, Helge Hafting wrote:
This patch lets LyX 2.0 use spreadsheets as external insets:
* gnumeric spreadsheets
* openoffice spreadsheets
* excel spreadhsheets
This is done using the ssconvert utility that comes with gnumeric,
so it is necessary to have gnumeric even if the
On 12/09/2010 09:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 9 déc. 2010 à 09:19, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that we are on it, might be more appropriate anyway. Undo is (I
think) a user interface component and BufferView is responsible for
how the Buffer is presented to the user and how
On 12/09/2010 10:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 9 déc. 2010 à 09:19, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that we are on it, might be more appropriate anyway. Undo is (I
think) a user interface component and BufferView is responsible for
how
On 12/08/2010 02:45 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
While you're at this, I wonder if you have a relatively easy fix for this
bug. Add a character to a document, then go to the end of the document. Now
do Undo, Redo. The redo moves you to the end of the document, so you don't
actually see what
On 12/08/2010 05:11 PM, Helge Hafting wrote:
This patch lets LyX 2.0 use spreadsheets as external insets:
* gnumeric spreadsheets
* openoffice spreadsheets
* excel spreadhsheets
This is done using the "ssconvert" utility that comes with gnumeric,
so it is necessary to have gnumeric even if the
On 12/09/2010 09:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 9 déc. 2010 à 09:19, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that we are on it, might be more appropriate anyway. Undo is (I
think) a user interface component and BufferView is responsible for
how the Buffer is presented to the user and how
On 12/09/2010 10:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 9 déc. 2010 à 09:19, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that we are on it, might be more appropriate anyway. Undo is (I
think) a user interface component and BufferView is responsible for
how
On 12/06/2010 12:39 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In the aforementioned function, I read:
bool const lfun_ok = lyx::getStatus(FuncRequest(code,
argument)).enabled();
bool const read_only = buffer().isReadonly();
okPB-setEnabled(!synchronized_view widget_ok !read_only
On 12/06/2010 12:39 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In the aforementioned function, I read:
bool const lfun_ok = lyx::getStatus(FuncRequest(code,
argument)).enabled();
bool const read_only = buffer().isReadonly();
okPB->setEnabled(!synchronized_view && widget_ok && !read_only &&
Hi,
I would like to invert the dispatch execution order, i.e.:
Cursor - Buffer - BufferView - GuiView - GuiApplication
The current top-down order was always weird to me because when you type
the first thing to try is to execute at the cursor location, not at the
global application level.
On 12/05/2010 11:39 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Any reason why not doing so?
yes sir :)
because it can introduce new regressions?
Valid one.
because you have generally almost no time to fix them when they appear?
Not fair. I am not able
On 12/05/2010 08:59 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 08:18 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Dec 5 02:18:32 2010
New Revision: 36734
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36734
Log:
Move buffer dispatching code from GuiView::dispatchToBufferView() to
On 12/05/2010 08:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 06:36 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/12/2010 23:55, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 03:41 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/12/2010 04:15, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Dec 4 04:15:53 2010
New Revision: 36710
Hi,
I would like to invert the dispatch execution order, i.e.:
Cursor -> Buffer -> BufferView -> GuiView -> GuiApplication
The current top-down order was always weird to me because when you type
the first thing to try is to execute at the cursor location, not at the
global application level.
On 12/05/2010 11:39 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Any reason why not doing so?
yes sir :)
because it can introduce new regressions?
Valid one.
because you have generally almost no time to fix them when they appear?
Not fair. I am not able
On 12/05/2010 08:59 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 08:18 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Dec 5 02:18:32 2010
New Revision: 36734
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36734
Log:
Move buffer dispatching code from GuiView::dispatchToBufferView() to
On 12/05/2010 08:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 06:36 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/12/2010 23:55, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 03:41 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/12/2010 04:15, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Dec 4 04:15:53 2010
New Revision: 36710
On 04/12/2010 04:15, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Dec 4 04:15:53 2010
New Revision: 36710
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36710
Log:
Revert r36696: We can't collect BibTeX information during the
updateBuffer() traversal. The reason is simple: InsetCitation needs
access
On 04/12/2010 23:28, Pavel Sanda wrote:
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sat Dec 4 23:07:39 2010
New Revision: 36721
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36721
Log:
Make sure the current view is set to busy in order to avoid a crash due to a
screen redraw in the middle of a
On 04/12/2010 23:55, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 03:41 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/12/2010 04:15, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Dec 4 04:15:53 2010
New Revision: 36710
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36710
Log:
Revert r36696: We can't collect BibTeX
On 05/12/2010 00:21, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Dec 5 00:21:47 2010
New Revision: 36731
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36731
Log:
Fix bug #7071 in cutSelection:
After a cut operation, we need to make sure that the Buffer is updated
because some further operation
On 04/12/2010 04:15, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Dec 4 04:15:53 2010
New Revision: 36710
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36710
Log:
Revert r36696: We can't collect BibTeX information during the
updateBuffer() traversal. The reason is simple: InsetCitation needs
access
On 04/12/2010 23:28, Pavel Sanda wrote:
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sat Dec 4 23:07:39 2010
New Revision: 36721
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36721
Log:
Make sure the current view is set to busy in order to avoid a crash due to a
screen redraw in the middle of a
On 04/12/2010 23:55, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/04/2010 03:41 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/12/2010 04:15, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Dec 4 04:15:53 2010
New Revision: 36710
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36710
Log:
Revert r36696: We can't collect BibTeX
On 05/12/2010 00:21, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Dec 5 00:21:47 2010
New Revision: 36731
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36731
Log:
Fix bug #7071 in cutSelection:
After a cut operation, we need to make sure that the Buffer is updated
because some further operation
On 02/12/2010 22:45, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/01/2010 07:45 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
format change but it strikes me as the correct solution
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS
Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original
implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ).
so we are at circles,
On 03/12/2010 15:18, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
you seriously mean that there is arabic translation for eg hunspell?
Maybe no translation, but a transliteration (i.e., use of arabic script).
there was some point in having aspell (libary) as a translatable
On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS
Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember
On 03/12/2010 15:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 3-12-2010 15:54, Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I would suspect that a wavy line
On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I did no serious investigation until now...
Only one example:
I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened...
The cursor was misplaced badly.
and soon you'll get another ones ...
few times i tried to
701 - 800 of 20260 matches
Mail list logo