On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:06:04AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >-std::string const & extension() const { return extension_; }
> >+std::string const & extension() const { return extension_list_[0]; }
> >
> >and extension_list_[0] would be an invalid address otherwise.
> >
> return extension
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:47:08AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> At the very end of Text::getStatus(), we have:
>
> if (code != NO_CODE
> && (cur.empty()
> || !cur.inset().insetAllowed(code)
> || cur.paragraph().layout().pass_thru))
> enable = false;
>
> This obviously disables
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:21:03PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > We'd have to look at mailing list discussions around this date to
> > understand whether this was fixing a real need or just being overly
> > cautious. André, do you remember about it?
> >
> > JMarc
>
> (Overly?) cautious, I thin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:29:00AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:58:08PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > No, I didn't find anything specific but it is clear that using t
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:00:28AM +0200, kor...@lyx.org wrote:
> Date: Thu Jun 9 01:00:28 2011
> New Revision: 38997
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38997
>
> Log:
> Use decimal representation of QT_VERSION for moc-run in cmake build to match
> the qglobal.h computation
>
> Modified:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:06:30PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:43:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > How portable is this in your opinion?
>
> It assumes a bourne compatible shell, but that assumption is made
> in so many places that I think it's very s
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Xu Wang wrote:
> Hi, I would like to learn Qt. I learn much better from physical books than
> online resources, although I've heard the Qt manual is very good.
>
> Does anyone have suggestions for me?
Your question is a bit off-topic here. Try qt-inter...
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:02:08PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 06.06.2011 um 17:54 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu:
>
> > Just to refresh this thread, I have reinstalled the standard Lyx 2
> > OSX build and the cursor problem has been corrected. So it seems
> > that this problem comes from the Cocoa
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 08:11:29AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 16.05.2011 23:54, venom00 wrote:
> >Vincent or someone else, can you tell me if it's OK to include a pair
> >of files directly from the Qt Creator code? Just a quick reply so I
> >can go on with the patch.
>
> Isn't QtCreator LGPL
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 06:59:38PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > With LyX 2.0.0
> > - open the Tutorial
> > - insert there a new table
> > - set the cursor into the new table
> >
> > In the LyX console window I then get these messag
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 05:36:24PM +0200, Kornel wrote:
> > > Lars only until 1.1.3 Lars for devel and JMarc for stable starting
> > > with 1.1.4fix1
> >
> > till 0.10 (~1996) announce is always from D.L. Johnson, with lines
> > author:Matthias, Maintenance: DL Johnson. 0.12 (~1998) announce is
>
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 05:53:28AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 11.05.2011 20:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>Side notes:
> >>1: we should really get rid of boost source.
> >>2: we should really get rid of boost using code
> >
> >whats your solution the problems with tr1::
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:33:35PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2011-05-06, venom00 wrote:
> >> >> Lua
> >> >>+ small and fast,
> >> >>+ used in LuaTeX, so it will become more common and known in the
> >> >> TeX community,
> >> >>+ a Lua interpreter can be embedded in LyX with
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:24:13PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > [..]
> >That's not a joke, it's not made up. I am honestly not aware
> >of any single operation, not even artificial scenarios, where
> >git performs worse than svn.
>
> Maybe this one:
>
> time svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-dev
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 07:45:44PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 04.05.2011 14:26, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >On 04/05/2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >>Hi everyone,
> >>As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll
> >>- what features are a must in the next release;
> >
>
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:45:04AM -0600, Rob Oakes wrote:
> With all that said, I did have a question regarding our existing
> infrastructure. Whatever model we end up settling on, would it be
> possible to mirror the git master branch to SVN? (Basically the same
> thing we do for the git users,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:27:36PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 04/05/2011 17:16, Rob Oakes ha scritto:
> >
> >>Software bloat is a term used to describe the tendency of newer computer
> >>programs to have a larger installation footprint, or have many unnecessary
> >>features that are not u
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:16:13PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for
> > > non-trivial feature sets if they
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:43:05PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > > anyone around strongly against 100-char wide rule?
> >
> > YES, me !
>
> hmm, i should also count caps lock and exclamation marks when doing
> next emoticons statistics... :)
>
> > "Normal Code" pl
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:00:16AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model
> and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete.
>
> I'm aware there might be some learning curve for devel
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:10:40PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 03/05/2011 16:03, Richard Heck ha scritto:
> >On 05/03/2011 09:25 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>On 03/05/2011 10:20, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >>>so let's decide to move to git (we loose nothing and gain some),
>
> Probably uni
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:43:40PM +0200, venom00 wrote:
> We need a limit, 100 is perfect IMSO [1].
>
> venom00 (is sure someone here is still developing on terminal)
Terminal or not (which I do use around 50% of the time) is not the full
picture, as one can have split editors in some IDEs, too
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:43:07PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > There are several reasons associated, we should avoid to nest too much our
> > code, if we have a 5 nested levels it becomes increasingly difficult to
> > read
> > the code.
>
> i didnt want to use 5 nested lev
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:23:50PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> venom00 wrote:
> > > The patch looks pretty good now, so I'll put it in my testing tree.
> >
> > I'm not completely sure of the red highlighting. Red is a color for errors,
> > I'll
> > try green, yellow and maybe bold.
> > Moreover I
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:04:58AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Do I undestand right, that with Git it would be possible to do this
> corrections/adjustments without spoiling the history -- also if no
> branches are used?
As long as the commits are held locally, you can reorder/merge/split
them a
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> On 2-5-2011 3:15, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:58:59AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> my fear is also that while the extensive branch usage is superior from
> &
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:58:59AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> [...]
> my fear is also that while the extensive branch usage is superior from
> the geeky point of view, its hindrance for people not so technically
> skilled. do we want only geeks to be around?
> [...]
Very good point. I don't think
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:58:53AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> - Less noise in commits: a new feature in SVN sometimes comprises over 20
> >> commits in
> ..
> > The commits are the beats of LyX's development heart, so why kill them.
>
> there is actually something on this
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi all,
>
> some stats for 2.0 development.
> (you will need mail client with fixed chars & proper tabs handling).
>
> * commit activity:
>
> Trunk 2.0: ...
>
> ...
> [...]
> ... 38 ...
> ...
*gosh*
This makes the release look
Hi.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:07:55PM +0200, venom00 wrote:
> > +void GuiDocument::hideView() {
> > + Dialog::hideView();
> > + // Reset the search box
> > + this->docPS->resetSearch();
> > +}
Style nits: { on a separate line for the function body, and this->
seems superfluous.
> > + /
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:31:08PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 26/04/2011 20:14, Julien Rioux ha scritto:
> >I don't feel the need to move to git. At all.
>
> I'm seeing 2 discussions merged, in this thread:
> 1) what development model to use (how many branches, what & how
> often to comm
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:16:50AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> let me guess, you still develop creator under vim and gdb ;)
For debugging I am really eating my own dog food. Editing is by now
about 50/50 real vim/fakevim, mostly depending on whether I expect
a lot of navigation, tendency falling.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:09:30AM +0200, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:58:57 +0200
> > Von: Enrico Forestieri
> > An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> > Betreff: Re: #7394, Crash in reverse serach
>
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:53:46PM +
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 04/14/2011 08:36 AM, venom00 wrote:
> >>
> >> Suggestion: use Qt Creator. I think it's the best solution.
> >>
> > That's what I use, though under Linux, and it is very good indeed.
>
> and Andre will get dru
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/09/2011 06:46 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> >I always saw those two warnings (paraphrased):
> >Lexer.cpp:197 may be used uninitialized
void Lexer::Pimpl::verifyTable()
{
// [...]
if (table <- this line?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:50:25PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> BTW do we have any german speaking mathematician on the list who knows
> how we should deal with the missing 'Satz' theorem (see
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7340)?
Depends a bit on what the actual problem is.
Usually I'd associat
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:45:32AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 18/03/2011 02:28, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit :
> > availableLV->installEventFilter(this);
> > selectedLV->installEventFilter(this);
> >+selectedHasFocus_ = false;
> > }
>
> Thanks. Note that, since this is a constr
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:06:10PM +0100, Kornel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. März 2011 schrieb Rob Oakes:
> > > What conversion is supposed to be happening in this case? Do you get any
> > > information on the terminal?
> >
> > Unfortunately, I haven't got a clue. I'm getting some very strange outpu
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 05:55:16PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > Usually the IDE has a pretty easy way of navigating to the declaration
> > of a function.
>
> I guess our coding workflow just differs. It is well possible that mine is
> blatantly amateurish.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 05:28:05PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> All right, but for sure we want to have some documentation in the header
> files.
Having the documentation in the header is a pretty good way to make
sure it does not get updated. Nobody corrects minor issues in Inset.h
as this
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 02:45:39PM +0100, kuem...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: kuemmel
> Date: Sat Mar 5 14:45:39 2011
> New Revision: 37859
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37859
>
> Log:
> compile. TODO: review default parameter for replace_all
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/src/fronte
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:27:22AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:18:22AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > While you are at it, wouldn't it be better renaming widthED as
> > > columnWidthED, in order to avoid confusion, and tabularWidthL
>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:11:52AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 12:34 AM, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:00:27AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >>Rich, you know the Graph code much better than me. Is it possible to have
> >>real const fun
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:00:27AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Rich, you know the Graph code much better than me. Is it possible to have
> real const functions to get pathes, or it is necessary to always set
> the visited flag in vertices_. Couldn't the calculation be done in one
> function call w
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:57:04AM +0100, lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: lasgouttes
> Date: Tue Jan 18 10:57:03 2011
> New Revision: 37245
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37245
>
> Log:
> Rename --enable-profiling to --enable-gprof to pave the way for a configure
> option for normal
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:35:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 13 janv. 2011 à 18:44, Andre Poenitz a écrit :
> >> 1) compute the metrics 8 times for a word of 8 letters 2) draw
> >> letter by letter all the times. 3) or rely on more on Qt widgets
> >> (
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:07:46AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 08:48 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>The metrics cache computes the width of every single character -
> >>inclusive cacheing of it (to get better performance). But the
> >>drawing is done with comp
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:55:11PM +0100, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Thu Dec 9 18:55:11 2010
> New Revision: 36789
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36789
>
> Log:
> Remove support for viewing URLs from hyperlinks. This is a security
> risk, due to our lack of control o
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:58:32PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Even some big guns were claiming for a while that deque is
> > uniformly better
>
> could you be more explicit about the source? sutter?
Yes, I believe so.
Andre'
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:09:48PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 04:54 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >>I read somewhere that stacks are best implemented as deques. Don't ask me
> >>why now,
> >>but I think they are slightly cheaper. (I'm sure Andre would have a view
> >>about thi
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:33:58AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 03.12.2010 um 04:36 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:44:57AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> >> Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>> There is a patch pending from Georg.
> >>> I present it here again and propose to
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:00:42PM +0100, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Wed Nov 17 23:00:42 2010
> New Revision: 36354
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36354
>
> Log:
> We don't generally use "static" this way in the LyX code any more. (Just
> a bit of cleanup while studyi
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:10:07PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 02:17 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > Op 10-11-2010 20:13, Enrico Forestieri schreef:
> >>On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:14:53PM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >>>- We then depend on QtNetwork.dll/lib
> >>YA de
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:40:02PM +0100, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Thu Nov 4 22:40:01 2010
> New Revision: 36092
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36092
>
> Log:
> Typos? Thinkos?
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_0.py
>
> Modified: lyx-devel/trun
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 03:53:56PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: rgheck
> > Date: Tue Nov 2 15:50:07 2010
> > New Revision: 35995
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35995
> >
> > Log:
> > Make sure that the members of this enum get the same value on every
>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:23:52AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Thanks, I used this for the fix: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35894
>
> One last question: How do I explicitly specify that the "0" in my
> patch is a pointer?
0 (and any integral constant expression that evaluates to zero such as
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > I disagree here, we should move to gitorious altogether. Keeping an
> > automatic svn update requires time (and cpu) and this time is better spent
> > on development IMO. This way the periodical problems we have with the sv
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:34:22AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >> I did something like this for Buffer::loadLyxFile(). Where would you
> >> advice to put the UI then ? I can now spit out a lot of error messages
> >> according to the number the functions comes up with. In Buffer ? In
> >>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > The only safe way to use them is when you control not only "sender" and
> > "receiver" but also all the code paths inbetween - i.e. basically only
> > within the same function or at least not from a deeply nested function.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 03:49:33PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Well, most of the controller code was useless indirection and
> complication (most of the controller code was necessitating almost
> the same amount of code in the gui implementation). So I am ready to
> bet that, at feature equal
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:51:04AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> I could be wrong, but I think we now have much more application
> logic in the Gui* classes then we did before the removal of all the
> Controller* classes. Perhaps alot of that could just be copied over,
> but it is still more work.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:01:53PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > I took a look and this looks good so far and a bit simpler than what I
> > thought would be necessary but I haven't tried to test it yet.
> >
>
> Please test if you have time. It was a long time ago for me too that I
> wor
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:54:03AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >
> > > I think what's happening is this. If you export pdf (say) without there
> > > already being a pdf file there, then ev
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:54:03AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> > I think what's happening is this. If you export pdf (say) without there
> > already being a pdf file there, then everything is fine. But if the pdf
> > file exists, then LyX will try to ask the user whether to overwrite.
> > T
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> We had this discussion recently, when I introduced an exception in
> math processing. There are real downsides to this of a return value.
> Granted, C++ provides less support for the use of "normal"
> exceptions than Java or Python doe
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 05:06:40PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a good method for splitting a string on ":",
> specifically, in TeX/LaTeX? I've written one, but it's not pretty.
For some strange reason TeX code never looks pretty.
Something like
\def\firstbithelper#1:#2\end{#
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:09:25PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 29.09.2010 um 19:50 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> Am 29.09.2010 um 12:11 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >>> The 'nice' w
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 29.09.2010 um 12:11 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > The 'nice' way should be to have a proper .pc file (for pkg-config) in the
> > nokia distribution. Is it here?
>
> I don't think so. Where would you search it?
an...@millo:~ >
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:19:24PM +0200, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Wed Sep 29 14:19:23 2010
> New Revision: 35532
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35532
>
> Log:
> This doesn't need to be a vector. Should be no change of behavior.
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/s
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:29:09PM +0200, sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Sun Sep 19 23:29:09 2010
> New Revision: 35452
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35452
>
> Log:
> PATH_MAX is not guaranteed by POSIX (fixes bug #6906).
> Patch from Samuel Thibault.
>
> Modified:
>l
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:30:58AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 13.09.2010 08:58, schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
>
> >You forgot the attachement...
>
> Sorry.
> In the meantime I found a solution - ugly but does exactly what I want.
> This is my problem:
>
> In line 433 of TextMetrics.cpp the text w
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:35:00PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed/InsetMathHull.cpp
> > > ==
> > > --- lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:53:30AM +0200, sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Sat Jul 17 11:53:29 2010
> New Revision: 34925
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34925
>
> Log:
> comment
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed/InsetMathHull.cpp
>
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/sr
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:42:36AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> >Thanks for the pointers. Sorry for not providing more context about
> >what I am trying to accomplish. The addition of a vector into the
> >TocItem class was to give me a place to store other insets that might
> >also be present
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:11:26AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/29/2010 08:05 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >On 06/29/2010 01:46 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >>Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>>One could argue that it allows the kind of code that's conceptionally
&
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:42:11PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 03:30 PM, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:47:50PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >>
> >>I think it remains LyX policy not to use Qt in the core. This is not
> >>necess
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:47:50PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 12:28 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> >Dear LyX-Developers,
> >
> >I have spent most of the morning trying to resolve a compiler warning
> >involving std::vector. After soliciting advice from a couple of
> >different people, it s
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > * Conceptually what is an anchor in a Cursor?
>
> The anchor is the starting point of a selection. If you have selected
> the word "hello" starting from the 'h' to the 'o', the anchor is
> positioned at 'h' and the cursor
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:29:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 03:27 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >>What is the current status or thinking of the XML format for lyx 2?
> >>
> >Ideally, LyX 2 would have an XML file format. However, no-one is
> >actively working on the issu
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:29:56PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 21:42 +0200 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> > Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 12:37 -0600 schrieb Rob Oakes:
> > > I've been using QPlainTextEdit as a test widget for the
> > > outliner/corkboard extensions, and I've bee
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:58:13AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 30.05.2010, 19:56 +0300 schrieb Amir Rachum:
> > Hi guys,
> > I just downloaded the LyX code base and I would like to help you
> > people with one of the most useful pieces software I ever had.
> > However, I am not sur
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:24:04PM +0200, v...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: vfr
> Date: Fri Jun 4 15:24:03 2010
> New Revision: 34590
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34590
>
> Log:
> Fix bug #6606: Crash when reverting a document with a not available document
> class.
>
> If the document c
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:52:54PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 17.05.2010 um 21:27 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
>
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:20:34PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> >>> Since I go no more translation updates after the m
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:20:34PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Since I go no more translation updates after the mailing list
> > revival, I will try to set up Lyx 1.6.6 now. Please stand by.
>
> please make it clear in the announce that we encourage people to build
>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 01:30:59PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 01:44:16AM +0100, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> > + bformat(_("The document class requested\n"
> > +"\t%1$s\n"
> > +
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:31:56PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:47:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 24/03/2010 00:45, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >> Qt 4.3 and 4.4 series were unusable on non-windows and non-linux systems.
> >
> > I thought 4.5 and 4.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:29:47AM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> I suspect many Windows people would prefer not to have to install GDB.
> Apparently it is possible to use e.g. the MSVC debugger on the command
> line and "attach it to the process by running vsjitdebugger.exe -p
> ProcessId fro
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:29:47AM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> + // We could use a callback instead of using QtGui here
> + // doAssert_callback(str);
> +
> + QMessageBox::critical( (QWidget*)0,
> + QString(to_utf8(_("Assertion Trigger
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 02:35:09PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Then we disagree on the weighting of practicability vs. purity.
>
> I think we disagree on the weighting of correctness. I think we should not
> integrate functionality in LyX that allows the user to pr
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:07:56PM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> Depends.exe says:
>
> "class QString QString::fromWCharArray(unsigned short const *,int)"
>
> So, qt defines/typedefs wchar_t as unsigned short ??
No, that's not Qt, but Windows, in msvcrt.h if memory serves right.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:50:09PM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> >> No.
> >> The above error message states that
> >> QString::fromWCharArray(wchar_t const *,int) is the problem.
> >> I don't understand the error message but it seems that fromWCharArray
>
> >> needs to be linked
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:12:59AM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> [..]
> If those two things look OK, is the attached patch ready to commit?
Looks ok to me.
Andre'
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:09:58AM +0100, Frank Thieme wrote:
> >> 2. src/support/debug.h: DEBUG is defined as DEBUG = (1 << 31)
> >> what is out of range for enum (32 bit) and I guess should be DEBUG
> >> = (1 << 30) as there is no 30, yet.
> >
> > 1 << 31 is within the 32 bit range.
>
> m
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:21:01PM +0100, Frank Thieme wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I found the problem - I have to use "-library=stlport4" because of the
> use of boost. But now there are some more problems:
>
> 1. Trailing commas in enums - this is part of C99, but not of C++ standard
Right.
> 2. src/su
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 01:53:40PM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> I thought I'd run the LyX code base through the RATS static analysis
> tool. All it did was report every single occurrence of a fixed width
> array in LyX. Never-the-less, in some cases the use of the fixed array
> seemed danger
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:21:34PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > So we are only allowed to compare it with OpenOffice or MS Word then?
>
> Nobody allows or disallows anything. I just think we should keep in mind what
> LyX aims to be.
>
> > OK... both programs p
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:42:52PM +0100, sp...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: spitz
> Date: Wed Feb 10 12:42:52 2010
> New Revision: 33408
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/33408
>
> Log:
> * GuiErrorList.cpp:
> - use GUIfied strings (bug 6397).
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/branches/BRANC
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:40:04PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> I would also introduce shared libraries which help to avoild
> circular dependencies between the libraries, especially when building
> Dlls on Windows, but maybe there is also a GCC flag to forbid such
> dependencies .
Linking with --
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:27:06PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Originally it was the Model-View-Controller pattern, so isn't a
> >> controller the perfect candidate for the central dispatcher?
> >>
> >
> > Wouldn't it be best to completely unlink t
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:53:58PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 31.01.2010, 14:29 +0100 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> > > How do we proceed now ?
> >
> > I think it's time to use signal/slots, this time in the right direction.
> > The buffer emits a m
1 - 100 of 11357 matches
Mail list logo
