On 28-Feb-2002 lasgouttes wrote:
Log message:
ding-dong, the witch is dead!, says John
Well I now get a segfault every time I load the UserGuide! Not a real
improvement. And why didn't you wait for Friday to commit this one?
Jug
--
On 28-Feb-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
Well I now get a segfault every time I load the UserGuide! Not a real
improvement. And why didn't you wait for Friday to commit this one?
Sorry you should have sent this tomorrow it was obviously a problem
with MY three, so now today you have to add
On 28-Feb-2002 lasgouttes wrote:
> Log message:
> "ding-dong, the witch is dead!", says John
Well I now get a segfault every time I load the UserGuide! Not a real
improvement. And why didn't you wait for Friday to commit this one?
Jug
--
On 28-Feb-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well I now get a segfault every time I load the UserGuide! Not a real
> improvement. And why didn't you wait for Friday to commit this one?
Sorry you should have sent this tomorrow it was obviously a problem
with MY three, so now today you have to add
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
Module name: lyx-devel
Repository: lyx-devel/src/frontends/
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/19 20:45:53
Modified files:
lyx-devel/src/frontends/: Makefile.am
Log
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 11:25 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
Module name: lyx-devel
Repository:lyx-devel/src/frontends/
Changes by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/19
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 12:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 20 February 2002 11:25 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT:/usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
Module
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
> Module name: lyx-devel
> Repository: lyx-devel/src/frontends/
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/19 20:45:53
>
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/src/frontends/: Makefile.am
>
>
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 11:25 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
> >> Module name: lyx-devel
> >> Repository:lyx-devel/src/frontends/
> >> Changes by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 12:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wednesday 20 February 2002 11:25 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | On Tuesday 19 February 2002 8:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >> CVSROOT:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
Module name: lyx-devel
Repository: lyx-devel/src/support/
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/16 16:59:55
After cvs update:
---
Configuration
Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Herbert Voss wrote:
[...]make all-recursive
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/voss/lyx-devel.orig/src'
Making all in mathed
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/voss/lyx-devel.orig/src/mathed'
cd ../.. automake --foreign src/mathed/Makefile
automake: src/mathed/Makefile.am: `libmathed.o'
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 05:12:26PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
- qt2 and gnome should not depend on the live xforms code, but rather
take a snapshot to be kept in their own dirs.
what do you mean ? cvs add ? /bin/cp ?
regards
john
--
I'd rather be rudely informed than politely left
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
> Module name: lyx-devel
> Repository: lyx-devel/src/support/
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/16 16:59:55
After cvs update:
---
Configuration
Host type:
Herbert Voss wrote:
> [...]make all-recursive
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/voss/lyx-devel.orig/src'
> Making all in mathed
> make[3]: Entering directory `/home/voss/lyx-devel.orig/src/mathed'
> cd ../.. && automake --foreign src/mathed/Makefile
> automake: src/mathed/Makefile.am:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 05:12:26PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> - qt2 and gnome should not depend on the live xforms code, but rather
> take a snapshot to be kept in their own dirs.
what do you mean ? cvs add ? /bin/cp ?
regards
john
--
"I'd rather be rudely informed than politely
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:56:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
make inset-toggle work when cursor is inside inset
Thanks.
Now the redraw problem really shines ;-}
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:56:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre wrote:
Log message: make inset-toggle work when cursor is inside inset
Andre Thanks.
Andre Now the redraw problem really shines ;-}
I have to admit that I did all my
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:56:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> make inset-toggle work when cursor is inside inset
Thanks.
Now the redraw problem really shines ;-}
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:56:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre> wrote:
>> Log message: make inset-toggle work when cursor is inside inset
Andre> Thanks.
Andre> Now the redraw problem really shines ;-}
I have to admit that I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
better delete this one? Otherwise we always have the
questions: 100% of what?
Herbert
--
Herbert Voss wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
better delete this one? Otherwise we always have the
questions: 100% of what?
On Monday 04 February 2002 3:42 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
better delete this one? Otherwise we always
On Monday 04 February 2002 3:51 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
better delete
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
better delete this one? Otherwise we always have the
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
Herbert it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
Herbert will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we better
Herbert delete this one?
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert always c%, because there are only some few cases
Herbert where p% makes sense, from my point as a lyx-user. The only
Herbert unit, which makes sense in different to c% is t(extwidth)%,
Herbert when in twocolumnmode.
Before reading the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This means that we do not have anything which does % of \textwidth!
(\paperwidth was \pagewidth before, which does not exist).
I think that PW, which is I think related to % should have a
case PW:
buffer abs(static_castint(val_/100)) .
On Monday 04 February 2002 4:06 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
Herbert it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
Herbert will be
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Minor thought: why are you using static_castint(val_) instead
Angus of int(val_) since val_ is a double?
Because Lars prefers that, I think.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
basic support for \xymatrix
what's this??
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:44:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
basic support for \xymatrix
I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages.
Missing environments:
flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat
Some missing commands:
\intertext
\hdotsfor
On 4 Feb 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
Herbert it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit %
Herbert will be misleading to a lot of users.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
basic support for \xymatrix
what's this??
Don't know. Ask Jules.
From mathed's technical point of view it is an array ;-)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
better delete this one? Otherwise we always have the
questions: 100% of what?
Herbert
--
Herbert Voss wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
>
> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
>
> will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
> better delete this one? Otherwise we always have the
> questions: 100% of
On Monday 04 February 2002 3:42 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
>
>
> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
> will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
> better delete this one? Otherwise
On Monday 04 February 2002 3:51 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
> >
> > it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
> >
> > will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
>>>
>>it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
>>
>>will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we
>>better delete this one? Otherwise
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
Herbert> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
Herbert> will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we better
Herbert>
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> always c%, because there are only some few cases
Herbert> where p% makes sense, from my point as a lyx-user. The only
Herbert> unit, which makes sense in different to c% is t(extwidth)%,
Herbert> when in twocolumnmode.
Before
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This means that we do not have anything which does % of \textwidth!
> (\paperwidth was \pagewidth before, which does not exist).
>
> I think that PW, which is I think related to "%" should have a
> case PW:
> buffer << abs(static_cast(val_/100)) <<
On Monday 04 February 2002 4:06 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
>
>
> Herbert> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Minor thought: why are you using static_cast(val_) instead
Angus> of int(val_) since val_ is a double?
Because Lars prefers that, I think.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> basic support for \xymatrix
what's this??
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:44:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> basic support for \xymatrix
I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages.
Missing environments:
flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat
Some missing commands:
\intertext
\hdotsfor
On 4 Feb 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
>
>
> Herbert> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
>
> Herbert> will be
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > basic support for \xymatrix
>
> what's this??
Don't know. Ask Jules.
>From mathed's technical point of view it is an array ;-)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hummm, what do we want this for ?
viewing latex style files from the texinfo dialog?
The Qt2 way is to use QWhatsThis.
but this is like a big tooltip right? not so suitable for viewing large files
though...
you want it out?
Just getting rid of xforms cruft, Ed.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Hummm, what do we want this for ?
viewing latex style files from the texinfo dialog?
ah OK I thought it only got used for the short help files. My mistake.
regards
john
--
24-hour boredom
I'm convicted instantly
-
it would be nice if you can commit my patch from yesterday
evening, too.
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
> Hummm, what do we want this for ?
viewing latex style files from the texinfo dialog?
> The Qt2 way is to use QWhatsThis.
but this is like a big tooltip right? not so suitable for viewing large files
though...
you want it out?
Just getting rid of xforms cruft, Ed.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Hummm, what do we want this for ?
>
> viewing latex style files from the texinfo dialog?
ah OK I thought it only got used for the short help files. My mistake.
regards
john
--
"24-hour boredom
I'm convicted instantly"
it would be nice if you can commit my patch from yesterday
evening, too.
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:01:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 10:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Log message:
| Herbert's big graphics patch.
So no the only missing part is async rendering?
That and being able to set
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:05:10AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/: QShowFile.C QShowFile.h
Hummm, what do we want this for ?
The Qt2 way is to use QWhatsThis.
regards
john
--
In no sense is [in]stability a reason to move to a new version. It's never a
John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:01:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 10:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Log message:
|Herbert's big graphics patch.
So no the only missing part is async rendering?
That and being
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:12:48PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
and rotation on screen. I'm not sure anyone cares about that though.
but this is a new feature.
er, no it's not. it's a regression against old-figure.
Nice when there, but not important
agreed
regards
john
--
In no sense
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:24:01PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
er, no it's not. it's a regression against old-figure.
images were rotated on screen in which lyx-version
for as long as I've used lyx, up to present CVS
regards
john
--
In no sense is [in]stability a reason to move to
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:01:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 January 2002 10:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > | Log message:
> > | Herbert's big graphics patch.
> >
> > So no the only missing part is async rendering?
>
> That and
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:05:10AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/: QShowFile.C QShowFile.h
Hummm, what do we want this for ?
The Qt2 way is to use QWhatsThis.
regards
john
--
"In no sense is [in]stability a reason to move to a new version. It's never a
John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:01:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>
>>On Tuesday 29 January 2002 10:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>>
>>>| Log message:
>>>|Herbert's big graphics patch.
>>>
>>>So no the only missing part is async
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:12:48PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >and rotation on screen. I'm not sure anyone cares about that though.
>
> but this is a new feature.
er, no it's not. it's a regression against old-figure.
> Nice when there, but not important
agreed
regards
john
--
"In no
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:24:01PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >er, no it's not. it's a regression against old-figure.
>
> images were rotated on screen in which lyx-version
for as long as I've used lyx, up to present CVS
regards
john
--
"In no sense is [in]stability a reason to
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Can someone show me the code that fails?
Lars A small example please, not the code from LyX.
I'm not sure Angus has found the exact case.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Can someone show me the code that fails?
Lars> A small example please, not the code from LyX.
I'm not sure Angus has found the exact case.
JMarc
On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekel wrote:
Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the
lyxcode definition in the
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus wrote:
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekel wrote:
Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still
On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, you wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus wrote:
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Try to take a look at LaTeXFeatures::getTClassPreamble(). It uses a
vector of bool (which should be safe) and stringstreams. I seem to
remember I have seen cases where cxx
On Friday 18 January 2002 2:18 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Try to take a look at LaTeXFeatures::getTClassPreamble(). It uses a
vector of bool (which should be safe)
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus That's ostringstream and std::string of course.
I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to a wrong assert in its
string implementation.
Angus I have no idea what's going wrong. This little program works
Angus fine! A
But then of course
On Friday 18 January 2002 3:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus That's ostringstream and std::string of course.
I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to a wrong assert in its
string implementation.
Angus I have no idea what's
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Friday 18 January 2002 3:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus That's ostringstream and std::string of course.
I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to a wrong assert in its
On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Where do you want me to add the std::flush?
Because I know it exists and because it may magically repair some
broken insternal thing. I don't know really.
That was where not why. But I'll try.
Angus Why does the top bit
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Where do you want me to add the std::flush?
Because I know it exists and because it may magically repair some
broken insternal thing. I don't know really.
Angus That
On Friday 18 January 2002 4:29 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Where do you want me to add the std::flush?
Because I know it exists and because it may magically
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Got it! The bug lies in the position counters of ostringstream.
Angus basic_stringbuf actually. Sometimes they ain't being set
Angus correctly.
Did you find out when? We have plenty of uses of this stream which
seem to work with you. It
On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dekel> wrote:
> >> Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the
> >> lyxcode
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus> wrote:
>> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekel> wrote:
>> >> Tidy up
On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, you wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Thursday 17 January 2002 5:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Angus> wrote:
> >> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Try to take a look at LaTeXFeatures::getTClassPreamble(). It uses a
>> vector of bool (which should be safe) and stringstreams. I seem to
>> remember I have seen
On Friday 18 January 2002 2:18 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Try to take a look at LaTeXFeatures::getTClassPreamble(). It uses a
> >> vector of bool
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> That's ostringstream and std::string of course.
I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to a wrong assert in its
string implementation.
Angus> I have no idea what's going wrong. This little program works
Angus> fine! A
But
On Friday 18 January 2002 3:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> That's ostringstream and std::string of course.
>
> I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due to a wrong assert in its
> string implementation.
>
> Angus> I
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 3:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Angus> That's ostringstream and std::string of course.
>> I had to use lyxstring with cxx 6.2, due
On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Where do you want me to add the std::flush?
>
> Because I know it exists and because it may magically repair some
> broken insternal thing. I don't know really.
That was "where" not "why". But I'll try.
> Angus> Why does
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus> Where do you want me to add the std::flush?
>> Because I know it exists and because it may magically repair some
>> broken insternal thing. I don't know
On Friday 18 January 2002 4:29 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Friday 18 January 2002 4:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Where do you want me to add the std::flush?
> >> Because I know it exists and because it
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Got it! The bug lies in the position counters of ostringstream.
Angus> basic_stringbuf actually. Sometimes they ain't being set
Angus> correctly.
Did you find out when? We have plenty of uses of this stream which
seem to work
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekel wrote:
Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the
lyxcode definition in the preamble but is otherwise Ok I think.
Dekel It does work for me. Can you
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekel> wrote:
>> Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the
>> lyxcode definition in the preamble but is otherwise Ok I think.
Dekel> It does work
Angus, I have three more insets in my own cvs, but they
make some problems after your changes. What have I to do
that it will compile again. Here the error messages for
the first inset, the other two have the same.
HErbert
In file included from Dialogs.C:20:
Angus, I have three more insets in my own cvs, but they
make some problems after your changes. What have I to do
that it will compile again. Here the error messages for
the first inset, the other two have the same.
HErbert
In file included from Dialogs.C:20:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the lyxcode
definition in the preamble but is otherwise Ok I think.
It does work for me.
Can you trace the problem ?
Does anyone else have this problem
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:28:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tidy up the file mathed.lyx. Still doesn't run without bolting the lyxcode
> definition in the preamble but is otherwise Ok I think.
It does work for me.
Can you trace the problem ?
Does anyone else have this
John Levon wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:07:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fix problem with nroff detection, remove dead code with old floats,
bogus message when closing last buffer, toolbar status when changing
^^^%^^
how
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 05:41:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
LyXFunc::getStatus was using setErrorMessage (meaning it set an error
even if we were not trying to dispatch). I added a
LyXFunc::setStatusMessage method instead, and if a lfun is disabled,
::dispatch sets the error
John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:07:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> fix problem with nroff detection, remove dead code with old floats,
>> bogus message when closing last buffer, toolbar status when changing
>>
>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 05:41:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> LyXFunc::getStatus was using setErrorMessage (meaning it set an error
> even if we were not trying to dispatch). I added a
> LyXFunc::setStatusMessage method instead, and if a lfun is disabled,
> ::dispatch sets the error
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
