Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > The INSTALL file is up to date. It recommends 5.6 and suggests 5.4 at least. > > 5.4 is good in theory (this was lowered after some bugs were fixed), 5.5.1 > > got more testing. There is no definitive answer here. > > +1 > > Should we also put it in RELEASE-NOTES or

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 10:30:11PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > Le 04/05/2017 à 19:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > > Guillaume MM wrote: > > > Le 01/05/2017 ?? 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > > We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for > > > > python 3 vs 2. I

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Le 04/05/2017 à 19:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume MM wrote: Le 01/05/2017 ?? 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a perfectly valid qt4.8. Note that the

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Guillaume MM wrote: > Le 01/05/2017 ?? 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for >> python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a >> perfectly valid qt4.8. >> >> Note that the end of life warning is not

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On 05/01/2017 05:37 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Monday, 1 May 2017 03.46.51 WEST Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/30/2017 07:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Suppose that a system has both Qt 4 and Qt 5 development libraries >>> installed. Should our automake and CMake build systems choose to

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:29:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 02/05/2017 à 03:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:21:18PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > > > Le 01/05/2017 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > > We can define a lower bound for acceptable

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Le 02/05/2017 à 03:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:21:18PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: Le 01/05/2017 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Le 01/05/2017 à 22:18, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : The plan was not to require Qt 5.1 but just to set in CMake the default switch from Qt4 to Qt5. What Qt5 version you use its up to you. The Qt5 that LyX makes me use is the Qt5 that is packaged on my system (on Linux). JMarc

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:18:28PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > El 01.05.2017 a las 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió: > > > We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for > > python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a > > perfectly valid qt4.8. >

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:21:18PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > Le 01/05/2017 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for > > python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a > > perfectly valid qt4.8. +1 >

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

El 01.05.2017 a las 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió: We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a perfectly valid qt4.8. The plan was not to require Qt 5.1 but just to set in CMake the default

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Le 01/05/2017 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a perfectly valid qt4.8. Note that the end of life warning is not relevant on old systems (in Linux

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a perfectly valid qt4.8. Note that the end of life warning is not relevant on old systems (in Linux world). So, what is the minimal good qt5 version ? JMarc

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On Monday, 1 May 2017 03.46.51 WEST Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/30/2017 07:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Suppose that a system has both Qt 4 and Qt 5 development libraries > > installed. Should our automake and CMake build systems choose to use Qt > > 4 or Qt 5? > > > > Uwe made a good point

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Am Sonntag, 30. April 2017 um 22:46:51, schrieb Richard Heck > On 04/30/2017 07:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Suppose that a system has both Qt 4 and Qt 5 development libraries > > installed. Should our automake and CMake build systems choose to use Qt > > 4 or Qt 5? > > > >

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On 04/30/2017 07:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Suppose that a system has both Qt 4 and Qt 5 development libraries > installed. Should our automake and CMake build systems choose to use Qt > 4 or Qt 5? > > Uwe made a good point that Qt 4 support is ending. See, for example, the > following

Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Suppose that a system has both Qt 4 and Qt 5 development libraries installed. Should our automake and CMake build systems choose to use Qt 4 or Qt 5? Uwe made a good point that Qt 4 support is ending. See, for example, the following paragraph (from [1]): Qt 4.8.7 is planned to be the last