Re: Figure 0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2014-04-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: The time you were the manager for 1.5/6.x I also many times upload test installers and you were aware of that. That time the main problem was that I did not had Vista and could not see if a problem that was only

Re: Figure 0

Am 04.04.2014 12:01, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: If you want to see something bad, you will always find something. It hurts me a lot that you see it like that. Why are you now that formalistic? Call it formalistic, if you wish. But please note that I am not the only one asking you for this.

Re: Figure 0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr : > >> The time you were the manager for 1.5/6.x I also many times upload test >> installers and you were aware of that. That time the main problem was >> that I did not had Vista and could not see if a problem

Re: Figure 0

Am 04.04.2014 12:01, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: If you want to see something bad, you will always find something. It hurts me a lot that you see it like that. Why are you now that formalistic? Call it formalistic, if you wish. But please note that I am not the only one asking you for this.

Re: Figure 0

2014-04-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: The problem is the naming of your binary. Oh, I simply increased the counter in the installer. I must give it a name and I really did not thought about the file name. Exactly. However, the lyx.exe said it is a dev version, not the

Re: Figure 0

2014-04-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr : > > The problem is the naming of your binary. > > Oh, I simply increased the counter in the installer. I must give it a name > and I really did not thought about the file name. Exactly. > However, the lyx.exe said it is a dev version,

Re: Figure 0

2014-04-03 1:13 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: I did not release anything. A bug was fixed and I wanted to be sure and thus wanted to have user feedback. Why? Because I spent about 4 hours with this bug and I saw strange things and some only on some PCS. I noticed that it was not

Re: Figure 0

For a change, why not seeing the good part of my work - in this case the benefit of user feedback for a tricky problem that was not easy to locate and not easy to verify that it was fixed? We are in a testing period and the aim if to get user feedback. And once again, why not trusting me

Re: Figure 0

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 02.04.2014 09:26, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. What is going on nowadays? This is going on: You keep ignoring all attempts to

Re: Figure 0

Am 03.04.2014 08:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: The problem is the naming of your binary. Oh, I simply increased the counter in the installer. I must give it a name and I really did not thought about the file name. However, the lyx.exe said it is a dev version, not the RC. And besides

Re: Figure 0

Am 03.04.2014 08:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: his has nothing to do with the service itself you provide. Everybody appreciates that. But _please_ conform to the group practice. For instance, you can publish snapshots from GIT as often as you want, but then, name these

Re: Figure 0

2014-04-03 1:13 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr : > I did not release anything. A bug was fixed and I wanted to be sure and > thus wanted to have user feedback. Why? Because I spent about 4 hours with > this bug and I saw strange things and some only on some PCS. I noticed that > it was not

Re: Figure 0

> > >> For a change, why not seeing the good part of my work - in this case the >> benefit of user feedback for a tricky problem that was not easy to locate >> and not easy to verify that it was fixed? We are in a testing period and >> the aim if to get user feedback. And once again, why not

Re: Figure 0

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 02.04.2014 09:26, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an >> installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. > > What is going on nowadays? This is going on: You keep ignoring all attempts

Re: Figure 0

Am 03.04.2014 08:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > The problem is the naming of your binary. Oh, I simply increased the counter in the installer. I must give it a name and I really did not thought about the file name. However, the lyx.exe said it is a dev version, not the RC. >> And besides

Re: Figure 0

Am 03.04.2014 08:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > his has nothing to do with the service itself you provide. Everybody > appreciates that. But _please_ conform to the group practice. For instance, > you can publish snapshots from GIT as often as you want, but then, name > these

Re: Figure 0

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this:

Re: Figure 0

2014-04-02 9:26 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. I hope you take notice of this now. I may add that this also probably causes license problems. We violate

Re: Figure 0

Am 02.04.2014 um 12:37 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org: 2014-04-02 9:26 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. I hope you take notice of this now.

Re: Figure 0

Am 02.04.2014 02:19, schrieb Jürgen Lange: Report: I can confirm, that the bug is now fixed. Thanks to all participating. Many thanks for testing! Good to hear that it works for you. regards Uwe

Re: Figure 0

Am 02.04.2014 09:26, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. What is going on nowadays? I did not release anything. A bug was fixed and I wanted to be sure and thus

Re: Figure 0

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > I found now a recipe to reproduce, see >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 >> > > This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this: >

Re: Figure 0

2014-04-02 9:26 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an > installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. > > I hope you take notice of this now. > I may add that this also probably causes license problems. We

Re: Figure 0

Am 02.04.2014 um 12:37 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2014-04-02 9:26 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an > installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. > > I hope you take notice of this

Re: Figure 0

Am 02.04.2014 02:19, schrieb Jürgen Lange: Report: I can confirm, that the bug is now fixed. Thanks to all participating. Many thanks for testing! Good to hear that it works for you. regards Uwe

Re: Figure 0

Am 02.04.2014 09:26, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: This is the third time we have to tell you to not create and release an installer for RC1 if it is not exactly what I released as RC1. What is going on nowadays? I did not release anything. A bug was fixed and I wanted to be sure and thus

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/LyX-210RC1-Installer-3.exe/download Please give

Re: Figure 0

Report: I can confirm, that the bug is now fixed. Thanks to all participating.

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/LyX-210RC1-Installer-3.exe/download Please give

Re: Figure 0

Report: I can confirm, that the bug is now fixed. Thanks to all participating.

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1. Does

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 08:49 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Lange juergen.la...@unitybox.de: Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1

Re: Figure 0

Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. regards Jürgen

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 20:47, schrieb Jürgen Lange: Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 I must admit that I don't have any clue what exactly triggers the bug and why it is only

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de>: Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1.

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 08:49 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Lange <juergen.la...@unitybox.de>: Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de>: Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf i

Re: Figure 0

Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. regards Jürgen

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 20:47, schrieb Jürgen Lange: Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 I must admit that I don't have any clue what exactly triggers the bug and why it is only

Figure 0

In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1. What's going wrong? Example file appended. thanks and regards Jürgen Figure 0.lyx Description: Binary data

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1. Does this problem disappear when you restart LyX? If so, I can say that I

Figure 0

In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1. What's going wrong? Example file appended. thanks and regards Jürgen Figure 0.lyx Description: Binary data

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1. Does this problem disappear when you restart LyX? If so, I can say that I