Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 1-3-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck: (I now released a new installer version: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ ) I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new server is known to be

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 1-3-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck: (I now released a new installer version: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ ) I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new server is known to be

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda: The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from the 'current' official one?

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/28/2012 06:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck: They've been downloaded. As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first installer version, I think that linking to my installer instead of putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better. (I now

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck: (I now released a new installer version: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ ) I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new server is known to be stable. Can you please delete the old

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda: > >> The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our >> svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are >> able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from >> the 'current'

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/28/2012 06:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck: They've been downloaded. As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first installer version, I think that linking to my installer instead of putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better. (I now

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck: (I now released a new installer version: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ ) I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new server is known to be stable. Can you please delete the old

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ? It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you complained about the last time. The key

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 28-2-2012 12:06, Pavel Sanda schreef: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ? It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk. Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well? Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit. It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one. Any testing and comments are welcome. I want to extensively test this before launching this as

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 28-2-2012 12:49, Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk. Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well? Pavel Pretty much yes, but not

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda: The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from the 'current' official one? It is the code that

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 13:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Any testing and comments are welcome. I want to extensively test this before launching this as the 'official' installer. As said this is not completely ready to go official. it is close but there might be issues. For example I just

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck: They've been downloaded. As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first installer version, I think that linking to my installer instead of putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better. (I now released a new installer version:

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

p.s. lyx.org is dead Sometimes I wonder whether you actually read the Lyx developers' list ? (hint: look for an email with the subject: Reminder: Downtime for lyx server - today) Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ? > > It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I > would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented > everything you complained about the last time. The

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 28-2-2012 12:06, Pavel Sanda schreef: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ? It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' > which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk. Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well? Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit. It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one. Any testing and comments are welcome. I want to extensively test this before launching this as

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 28-2-2012 12:49, Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk. Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well? Pavel Pretty much yes, but not

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda: The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from the 'current' official one? It is the code that

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 13:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Any testing and comments are welcome. I want to extensively test this before launching this as the 'official' installer. As said this is not completely ready to go official. it is close but there might be issues. For example I just

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck: They've been downloaded. As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first installer version, I think that linking to my installer instead of putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better. (I now released a new installer version:

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

p.s. lyx.org is dead Sometimes I wonder whether you actually read the Lyx developers' list ? (hint: look for an email with the subject: "Reminder: Downtime for lyx server - today") Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 27-2-2012 1:59, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.) Will this be an official installer or is it again an

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/27/2012 01:04 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? Richard For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/26/2012 07:59 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.) or should I just release the source only? We should

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Can verify that it works fine on Mac OSX 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard). Thanks! /Anders On 2012-02-27 07.04, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? Richard For Leopard and

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 27.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Richard Heck: We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary. I'll wait another day, but I don't see the point of delaying the release any further. Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ I tested it on Win XP 64 bit,

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 27.02.2012 12:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ? It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you complained

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were truncated. I re-uploaded them again and they are now complete. regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

I tested it quickly under Windows 7, and it worked fine. Thanks! Regards, Yihui -- Yihui Xie xieyi...@gmail.com Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name Department of Statistics, Iowa State University 2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/27/2012 07:14 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were truncated. I re-uploaded them again and they are now complete.

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Op 27-2-2012 1:59, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.) Will this be an official installer or is it again an

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/27/2012 01:04 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? Richard For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/26/2012 07:59 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.) or should I just release the source only? We should

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Can verify that it works fine on Mac OSX 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard). Thanks! /Anders On 2012-02-27 07.04, "Stephan Witt" wrote: >Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the >>source only? >> >> Richard >> >

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 27.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Richard Heck: We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary. I'll wait another day, but I don't see the point of delaying the release any further. Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ I tested it on Win XP 64 bit,

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 27.02.2012 12:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ? It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you complained

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were truncated. I re-uploaded them again and they are now complete. regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

I tested it quickly under Windows 7, and it worked fine. Thanks! Regards, Yihui -- Yihui Xie Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name Department of Statistics, Iowa State University 2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Uwe Stöhr

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On 02/27/2012 07:14 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Here is my installer: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were truncated. I re-uploaded them again and they are now complete.

LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? Ubuntu binaries are already available on the PPA. Liviu

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Richard Heck wrote: Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? If interested parties were not able to build binaries in the timeframe of one week there is no point to wait more. Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.) or should I just release the source only? We should first have at least one Mac and one Win

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? Richard For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg

LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source > only? > Ubuntu binaries are already available on the PPA. Liviu

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Richard Heck wrote: > Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source > only? If interested parties were not able to build binaries in the timeframe of one week there is no point to wait more. Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck: Anyone planning to produce binaries? I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.) or should I just release the source only? We should first have at least one Mac and one Win

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck: > Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only? > > Richard > For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg