Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-19 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 19 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: > > while "ggf." was marked as english now. > > Sorry, I cannot confirm that. Neither on Mac nor on Linux. I was describing the behaviour which I _had_. Now I don't see it also. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-19 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 19.09.2010 um 14:36 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Sonntag 19 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english >> af

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-19 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 19 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >>> Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: > I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english > after accepting ... > > Which word? There is thi

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-19 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 18.09.2010 um 09:36 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 18.09.2010 um 09:12 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: >>> Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english after accepti

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-18 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 18.09.2010 um 09:39 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Samstag 18 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> Am 17.09.2010 um 19:44 schrieb Kornel Benko: >>> Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> The hunspell library I use is self compiled and doesn't exist below /usr or >> /usr/local. So

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag 18 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 17.09.2010 um 19:44 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english > >> after accepting ... > > > > But this happens only, if continuous

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-18 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 18.09.2010 um 09:12 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: >>> I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english >>> after accepting ... >> >> But this happens only, if continuous spe

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english > > after accepting ... > > But this happens only, if continuous spellchecking is set. > > Kornel Now it's work

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-18 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 17.09.2010 um 19:44 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english >> after accepting ... > > But this happens only, if continuous spellchecking is set. I have a problem and asking for help w

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko: > I attach a test-case. The spell-checker even marks the word as english > after accepting ... But this happens only, if continuous spellchecking is set. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 17.09.2010 um 18:20 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> Am 17.09.2010 um 08:09 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >>> Am 15.09.2010 um 13:11 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Everything works as expected, but some

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 17.09.2010 um 18:20 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> Am 17.09.2010 um 08:09 schrieb Stephan Witt: >>> Am 15.09.2010 um 13:11 schrieb Kornel Benko: Everything works as expected, but some words with "dot" are not recognized as correct.

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag 17 September 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 17.09.2010 um 08:09 schrieb Stephan Witt: > > Am 15.09.2010 um 13:11 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> Everything works as expected, but some words with "dot" are not > >> recognized as correct. > >> > >> Say, I want enter "ggf.". This word is marke

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 17.09.2010 um 08:09 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 15.09.2010 um 13:11 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> Everything works as expected, but some words with "dot" are not recognized >> as correct. >> >> Say, I want enter "ggf.". This word is marked as not ok, but right klick >> shows as 1. alternative "

Re: Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-16 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 15.09.2010 um 13:11 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Everything works as expected, but some words with "dot" are not recognized as > correct. > > Say, I want enter "ggf.". This word is marked as not ok, but right klick > shows as 1. alternative "ggf.". Selecting it I now have "ggf..", but still > ma

Small glitch in spellchecker (trunk)

2010-09-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Everything works as expected, but some words with "dot" are not recognized as correct. Say, I want enter "ggf.". This word is marked as not ok, but right klick shows as 1. alternative "ggf.". Selecting it I now have "ggf..", but still marked. Document language: german Spellchecker: Hunspell Co