On 19/06/2019 16:41, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
...are at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. Please
let me know if they are OK. I'll be travelling tomorrow, but will do the
release over the weekend.
Riki
Is it normal that there are no release notes specific to the
Le 20/06/2019 à 13:33, Daniel a écrit :
Yes, it is a "feature" when some of the layout files have changed. I
think this should be revisited eventually.
I don't see the connection between layout files and toolbar positions.
Indeed, I meant ui files. See commits 8e4d2d66ce8d and 7720592b2.
On 20/06/2019 10:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/06/2019 à 10:03, Daniel a écrit :
I did a quick test. Installs and runs on Windows 10 with MiKTeX. Most
importantly, I noticed no slowdown. However, it reset my toolbar
stated (e.g. position and movability) which are saved in the registry.
Am 20.06.2019 um 12:07 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2019, 12:03 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Womser-
> Schütz:
>> I just recognized a vey, very serious problem at least in the Windows
>> build :-) :-) :-)
>> The credits-entry for me is missing.
> The explanation is probably that
Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2019, 12:03 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Womser-
Schütz:
> I just recognized a vey, very serious problem at least in the Windows
> build :-) :-) :-)
> The credits-entry for me is missing.
The explanation is probably that your contributions are only in the 2.4
line, not (yet)
Am 20.06.2019 um 10:27 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 20/06/2019 à 10:03, Daniel a écrit :
>> I did a quick test. Installs and runs on Windows 10 with MiKTeX. Most
>> importantly, I noticed no slowdown. However, it reset my toolbar
>> stated (e.g. position and movability) which are saved in
Le 20/06/2019 à 10:03, Daniel a écrit :
I did a quick test. Installs and runs on Windows 10 with MiKTeX. Most
importantly, I noticed no slowdown. However, it reset my toolbar stated
(e.g. position and movability) which are saved in the registry. This
problem might have been there in earlier
On 20/06/2019 00:44, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 20/06/2019 3:14 AM, Jürgen Womser-Schütz wrote:
Am 19.06.2019 um 16:41 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
...are at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. Please
let me know if they are OK. I'll be travelling tomorrow, but will do the
On 20/06/2019 3:14 AM, Jürgen Womser-Schütz wrote:
Am 19.06.2019 um 16:41 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
...are at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. Please
let me know if they are OK. I'll be travelling tomorrow, but will do the
release over the weekend.
Riki
Works for
Am 19.06.2019 um 16:41 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> ...are at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. Please
> let me know if they are OK. I'll be travelling tomorrow, but will do the
> release over the weekend.
>
> Riki
>
>
Works for me. I exported successful the tutorial and
...are at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. Please
let me know if they are OK. I'll be travelling tomorrow, but will do the
release over the weekend.
Riki
El 15.04.2017 a las 22:13, Stephan Witt escribió:
Sorry, mastering a console window is not that difficult.
It is! This requires a lot of background knowledge. Show me a person who
is not studied (has a "normal job") and can use a console.
Software is just a tool. I mean you know how to use
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:36:57AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> I hope this helps and I didn’t forgot any important info.
Thanks for writing that out, Stephan. And thanks for being willing to
consider this, Uwe.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am 27.07.2016 um 11:02 schrieb Alberto Escrig Vidal:
I've just updated to 2.2.1 and it doesn't work on my windows 7 32-bit machine.
On startup, I get msvcp140.dll is not a valid Windows app or something like
this.
Dear Alberto,
I released yesterday a fixed installer:
Dear LyX developers
I've just updated to 2.2.1 and it doesn't work on my windows 7 32-bit machine.
On startup, I get msvcp140.dll is not a valid Windows app or something like
this.
It seems that you linked LyX against the 64bit version of the MSVC++ runtime
libraries. Indeed if I run this
Windows binaries for LyX 2.1.4 are now available for download.
Public release of LyX version 2.1.4
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.1.4. This is the fourth
maintenance release in the 2.1.x series.
Please note that, at this time
Windows binaries for LyX 2.1.4 are now available for download.
Public release of LyX version 2.1.4
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.1.4. This is the fourth
maintenance release in the 2.1.x series.
Please note that, at this time
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
I noticed that sourceforge had problems so that the bundle installer was not updated. Now it
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old version 1 is still at the ftp page:
On 11/13/2012 06:09 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
I noticed that sourceforge had problems so that the bundle installer was not updated. Now it
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old version 1 is still at the ftp page:
On 11/13/2012 06:09 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old
Am 08.11.2012 01:00, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But
I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users reported to me.
During the last days I fixed many small bugs in the installer and also revised the dictionary
handling,
Am 11.11.2012 16:50, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
It looks better now indeed.
Thanks for giving it a try.
One thing I noticed is that the antivirus software gives the following warning
when uninstalling:
uninstall-lyx.exe tries to add a value to a secured registry entry:
Am 08.11.2012 01:00, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But
I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users reported to me.
During the last days I fixed many small bugs in the installer and also revised the dictionary
handling,
Am 11.11.2012 16:50, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
It looks better now indeed.
Thanks for giving it a try.
One thing I noticed is that the antivirus software gives the following warning
when uninstalling:
"uninstall-lyx.exe tries to add a value to a secured registry entry:
Op 8-11-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 08.11.2012 00:49, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX
2.0.4. But I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users reported to me.
Below is the changelog since LyX 2.0.4. I followed most of the
Op 8-11-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 08.11.2012 00:49, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX
2.0.4. But I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users reported to me.
Below is the changelog since LyX 2.0.4. I followed most of the
On 11/07/2012 06:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 07.11.2012 19:44, schrieb Richard Heck:
Still waiting for Windows binaries for 2.0.5
Here they are:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX
2.0.4. But I used
On 11/07/2012 06:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 07.11.2012 19:44, schrieb Richard Heck:
Still waiting for Windows binaries for 2.0.5
Here they are:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX
2.0.4. But I used
Still waiting for Windows binaries for 2.0.5
Richard
Am 07.11.2012 19:44, schrieb Richard Heck:
Still waiting for Windows binaries for 2.0.5
Here they are:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users
Am 08.11.2012 00:49, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But
I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users reported to me.
Below is the changelog since LyX 2.0.4. I followed most of the suggestions from Vincent regarding
the
Still waiting for Windows binaries for 2.0.5
Richard
Am 07.11.2012 19:44, schrieb Richard Heck:
Still waiting for Windows binaries for 2.0.5
Here they are:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users
Am 08.11.2012 00:49, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But
I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users reported to me.
Below is the changelog since LyX 2.0.4. I followed most of the suggestions from Vincent regarding
the
A Windows installer for 1.6.8 is already available:
Could someone please upload an installer-free binary package for
1.6.8 and 2.0beta1 for Windows onto ftp.lyx.org?
TIA,
Sincerely,
Wolfgang
> A Windows installer for 1.6.8 is already available:
Could someone please upload an installer-free binary package for
1.6.8 and 2.0beta1 for Windows onto ftp.lyx.org?
TIA,
Sincerely,
Wolfgang
Hi everyone,
Is there any plan afoot for Windows binaries of 1.6.8 and the beta of 2.0.0? I
realise I could compile them myself, but I'm not set up to do that, and besides
it would be nice to have the official binaries.
Thanks,
Jim
Is there any plan afoot for Windows binaries of 1.6.8
A Windows installer for 1.6.8 is already available:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg83880.html
An installer for 2.0beta1 follows tomorrow.
regards Uwe
Am 17.11.2010 22:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
An installer for 2.0beta1 follows tomorrow.
It is now available:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg83884.html
regards Uwe
Hi everyone,
Is there any plan afoot for Windows binaries of 1.6.8 and the beta of 2.0.0? I
realise I could compile them myself, but I'm not set up to do that, and besides
it would be nice to have the "official" binaries.
Thanks,
Jim
> Is there any plan afoot for Windows binaries of 1.6.8
A Windows installer for 1.6.8 is already available:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg83880.html
An installer for 2.0beta1 follows tomorrow.
regards Uwe
Am 17.11.2010 22:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
An installer for 2.0beta1 follows tomorrow.
It is now available:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg83884.html
regards Uwe
1.5.0 is going to be release soon but I have compiled today's
snapshot and put it at http://www.lyx.org/~bpeng/ (windows binary
using the official windows installer, dictionary installation does not
work).
Thanks. By the way, I do prefer the official installer. Unfortunately I found
two bugs
Thanks. By the way, I do prefer the official installer. Unfortunately I found
two bugs within the first minute or so:
It is up to Jose to decide whether or not a rc3 is needed, but I guess
a snapshot like this should help clear major problems. I do encourage
lyx-user users to try out the
1. Chapter numbering bug (minor). I have a chapter that is in a separate file
and included in the main document. The chapter is in a different (but
compatible) style than the main document (the chapter uses report.cls and the
main document uses a style that is derived from report.cls). I have
Unfortunately I found
two bugs within the first minute or so:
I got a sample document through private email. The first problem is
that the chapter number of a child document will be 0 if the child
document uses a different layout from the master document. Because lyx
explicitly requires that
> 1.5.0 is going to be release soon but I have compiled today's
> snapshot and put it at http://www.lyx.org/~bpeng/ (windows binary
> using the official windows installer, dictionary installation does not
> work).
Thanks. By the way, I do prefer the official installer. Unfortunately I found
two
Thanks. By the way, I do prefer the official installer. Unfortunately I found
two bugs within the first minute or so:
It is up to Jose to decide whether or not a rc3 is needed, but I guess
a snapshot like this should help clear major problems. I do encourage
lyx-user users to try out the
> 1. Chapter numbering bug (minor). I have a chapter that is in a separate file
> and included in the main document. The chapter is in a different (but
> compatible) style than the main document (the chapter uses report.cls and the
> main document uses a style that is derived from report.cls). I
Unfortunately I found
two bugs within the first minute or so:
I got a sample document through private email. The first problem is
that the chapter number of a child document will be 0 if the child
document uses a different layout from the master document. Because lyx
explicitly requires that
It's approaching a month since the last release candidate. Could anyone please
upload a more recent Windows binary? I using rc2 and the frequent crashes are
very annoying. It looks like most of the bugs I'm experiencing have been fixed
in the trunk. Like most Windows users, I don't have a compiler
On 7/21/07, Lyx user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's approaching a month since the last release candidate. Could anyone please
upload a more recent Windows binary? I using rc2 and the frequent crashes are
very annoying.
1.5.0 is going to be release soon :-) but I have compiled today's
snapshot
It's approaching a month since the last release candidate. Could anyone please
upload a more recent Windows binary? I using rc2 and the frequent crashes are
very annoying. It looks like most of the bugs I'm experiencing have been fixed
in the trunk. Like most Windows users, I don't have a compiler
On 7/21/07, Lyx user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's approaching a month since the last release candidate. Could anyone please
upload a more recent Windows binary? I using rc2 and the frequent crashes are
very annoying.
1.5.0 is going to be release soon :-) but I have compiled today's
snapshot
Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
Joost
On 9/25/06, Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
I am not sure. Starting lyx from and command window may help.
Bo
Joost Verburg 9:
Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
Joost
When I remove all items in testclass.lst I also could not start lyx:
C:\Programme\LyX14\binlyx.exe
LyXTextClassList::Read: no textclasses found!
Maybe we should not immediately quit in this
There may also be a problem with the assembly manifests.
Can someone who has problems with LyX 1.4.3 on Windows try to install:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=32BC1BEE-A3F9-4C13-9C99-220B62A191EEdisplaylang=en
and report whether this solves the problem?
Joost
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Joost Verburg 9:
Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
Joost
When I remove all items in testclass.lst I also could not start lyx:
C:\Programme\LyX14\binlyx.exe
LyXTextClassList::Read: no textclasses found!
Maybe we should not
Peter Kümmel wrote:
To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
I mean adding only as fall-back script in the start menu,
which is hopefully used by the people who have trouble
with their installation.
(for instance, Firefox also installs a Safe Mode start)
I think they will test
Peter Kümmel wrote:
To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
The main problem seems to be related to an assembly manifest. This can
cause problems on Windows XP systems without the Visual C++ 2005
redistributable. I'm uploading an updated installer.
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
The main problem seems to be related to an assembly manifest. This can
cause problems on Windows XP systems without the Visual C++ 2005
redistributable. I'm uploading an updated installer.
Joost Verburg wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
The main problem seems to be related to an assembly manifest. This can
cause problems on Windows XP systems without the Visual C++ 2005
redistributable. I'm uploading an updated installer.
Peter Kümmel wrote:
assembly manifest? It is not enough to ship the msvcr80.dll
and msvcp80.dll files? Are they specific to the Windows version?
An additional manifest should be included to point to the private assembly.
Joost
Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
Joost
On 9/25/06, Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
I am not sure. Starting lyx from and command window may help.
Bo
Joost Verburg 9:
> Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
>
> Joost
>
>
When I remove all items in testclass.lst I also could not start lyx:
C:\Programme\LyX14\bin>lyx.exe
LyXTextClassList::Read: no textclasses found!
Maybe we should not immediately quit in
There may also be a problem with the assembly manifests.
Can someone who has problems with LyX 1.4.3 on Windows try to install:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=32BC1BEE-A3F9-4C13-9C99-220B62A191EE=en
and report whether this solves the problem?
Joost
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Joost Verburg 9:
>> Maybe this be related to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2829 ?
>>
>> Joost
>>
>>
>
> When I remove all items in testclass.lst I also could not start lyx:
>
> C:\Programme\LyX14\bin>lyx.exe
> LyXTextClassList::Read: no textclasses found!
>
>
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
I mean adding only as fall-back script in the start menu,
which is hopefully used by the people who have trouble
with their installation.
(for instance, Firefox also installs a "Safe Mode" start)
I think they will test
Peter Kümmel wrote:
To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
The main problem seems to be related to an assembly manifest. This can
cause problems on Windows XP systems without the Visual C++ 2005
redistributable. I'm uploading an updated installer.
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
>
> The main problem seems to be related to an assembly manifest. This can
> cause problems on Windows XP systems without the Visual C++ 2005
> redistributable. I'm uploading an updated
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> To solve this problem we could add a lyx-configure.bat,
>
> The main problem seems to be related to an assembly manifest. This can
> cause problems on Windows XP systems without the Visual C++ 2005
> redistributable. I'm uploading an updated
Peter Kümmel wrote:
"assembly manifest"? It is not enough to ship the msvcr80.dll
and msvcp80.dll files? Are they specific to the Windows version?
An additional manifest should be included to point to the private assembly.
Joost
Guido Milanese wrote:
Me too. the Dos window flashes for a moment and disappewars
immetiately. If I were on Unix-like systems (as I normally am) I would
say it's a matter of permissions, because trying to call the program
from a dos window I get an error messages sayng that it is not
Guido Milanese wrote:
> Me too. the "Dos" window flashes for a moment and disappewars
> immetiately. If I were on Unix-like systems (as I normally am) I would
> say it's a matter of permissions, because trying to call the program
> from a "dos" window I get an error messages sayng that it is not
Alex wrote:
I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).
I had to rename the configuration directory for successful lyx start.
The configuration directory contained valid config for the 1.4.3svn!
Did the configure script fail the first time
Dear all,
I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).
I had to rename the configuration directory for successful lyx start.
The configuration directory contained valid config for the 1.4.3svn!
Alex
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Same problem here. I
Yes, It said it could not write the configuration file.
(What in case was created with lyx 1.4.3svn...)
Alex
Joost Verburg wrote:
Alex wrote:
I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).
I had to rename the configuration directory for
Alex wrote:
I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).
I had to rename the configuration directory for successful lyx start.
The configuration directory contained valid config for the 1.4.3svn!
Did the configure script fail the first time
Dear all,
I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).
I had to rename the configuration directory for successful lyx start.
The configuration directory contained valid config for the 1.4.3svn!
Alex
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
> Same problem here.
Yes, It said it could not write the configuration file.
(What in case was created with lyx 1.4.3svn...)
Alex
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Alex wrote:
>> I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
>> (linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).
>>
>> I had to rename the configuration
85 matches
Mail list logo
