Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:31:06 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
--enable-build-type=release disables debug by default. But with --
enable-debug, you have
Strangely, after re-building with debug enabled, I started getting a lot
fewer crashes. This
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:31:06 +0200
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > --enable-build-type=release disables debug by default. But with --
> > enable-debug, you have
> >
> Strangely, after re-building with debug enabled, I started getting a lot
> fewer
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:31:06 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
--enable-build-type=release disables debug by default. But with --
enable-debug, you have
Strangely, after re-building with debug enabled, I started getting a lot
fewer crashes. This happened this morning, but
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:31:06 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> --enable-build-type=release disables debug by default. But with --
> enable-debug, you have
>
Strangely, after re-building with debug enabled, I started getting a lot
fewer crashes. This happened this morning,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 22:31:26 +0100
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
Yet another backtrace. This time Sweave wasn't involved, and I only
tried to compile a very simple document. See attached.
And another one. The latest seems more verbose.
Liviu
PS Should I keep them coming?
On 08/07/2010 10:25 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 22:31:26 +0100
Liviu Androniclandronim...@gmail.com wrote:
Yet another backtrace. This time Sweave wasn't involved, and I only
tried to compile a very simple document. See attached.
And another one. The latest seems
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:23:00 -0400
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
Yes, though these backtraces aren't very informative, as they're not
really telling us what we'd need to know about the call stack. If you
could compile with debugging symbols enabled, that would really help.
Hmm, I
Le 7 août 10 à 19:30, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
Hmm, I thought that having compiled from source I had those enabled.
What ./configure switch should I use? Should I call LyX with a
particular -dbg switch, too?
Liviu
What does lyx -version say about build flags?
It should have debug info by
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:42:49 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
What does lyx -version say about build flags?
It should have debug info by default (unless there is a bug in the
script)
It seems that there is a bug in the script:
li...@debian-liv:~$ lyx-svn -version
LyX
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:42:49 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
--enable-debug is the option that you need, but it should have been
automatic.
I tried the following, but I think I'm not getting the needed flags
configured. Am I doing smth wrong?
Liviu
Le 7 août 10 à 20:14, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:42:49 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
--enable-debug is the option that you need, but it should have been
automatic.
I tried the following, but I think I'm not getting the needed flags
configured. Am I
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 22:31:26 +0100
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Yet another backtrace. This time Sweave wasn't involved, and I only
> tried to compile a very simple document. See attached.
>
And another one. The latest seems more verbose.
Liviu
PS Should I keep them coming?
On 08/07/2010 10:25 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 22:31:26 +0100
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Yet another backtrace. This time Sweave wasn't involved, and I only
tried to compile a very simple document. See attached.
And another one. The latest seems
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:23:00 -0400
Richard Heck wrote:
> Yes, though these backtraces aren't very informative, as they're not
> really telling us what we'd need to know about the call stack. If you
> could compile with debugging symbols enabled, that would really help.
>
Le 7 août 10 à 19:30, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
Hmm, I thought that having compiled from source I had those enabled.
What ./configure switch should I use? Should I call LyX with a
particular -dbg switch, too?
Liviu
What does lyx -version say about build flags?
It should have debug info by
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:42:49 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What does lyx -version say about build flags?
>
> It should have debug info by default (unless there is a bug in the
> script)
>
It seems that there is a bug in the script:
li...@debian-liv:~$ lyx-svn
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:42:49 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> --enable-debug is the option that you need, but it should have been
> automatic.
>
I tried the following, but I think I'm not getting the needed flags
configured. Am I doing smth wrong?
Liviu
Le 7 août 10 à 20:14, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:42:49 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
--enable-debug is the option that you need, but it should have been
automatic.
I tried the following, but I think I'm not getting the needed flags
configured. Am I
Dear devels
I'm getting regular crashes in alpha5, something I didn't encounter
in previous alpha releases. I'll start posting crash messages here,
when they happen. I attach the backtrace of the latest crash.
Regards
Liviu 4 : keep.source term tex
Error: chunk 4
Error in cat(list(...), file,
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com writes:
Dear devels
I'm getting regular crashes in alpha5, something I didn't encounter
in previous alpha releases. I'll start posting crash messages here,
when they happen. I attach the backtrace of the latest crash.
This would be more usable if it had
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:28:50 +0100
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear devels
I'm getting regular crashes in alpha5, something I didn't encounter
in previous alpha releases. I'll start posting crash messages here,
when they happen. I attach the backtrace of the latest crash.
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com writes:
Now I've got a freeze. Here are the last debug lines:
Liviu
[..]
4 : keep.source term tex
Error: chunk 4
Error in parse(text = chunk) : unexpected '}' in:
cat(\\newpage{})
}
Is the problem related to the fact that you have a
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:27:03 +0200
Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
Is the problem related to the fact that you have a SWeave error?
I am not very sure (since I'm currently working only on Sweave
documents), but it seems so. Thinking about it, I was actually
getting crashes in
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:41:57 +0100
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this is reproducible, but the attached document caused
a crash here. I compiled via pdflatex. Does this help or should I
attempt more sophisticated debugging?
Because of the crash I didn't save the
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:41:57 +0100
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this is reproducible, but the attached document caused
a crash here. I compiled via pdflatex. Does this help or should I
attempt more sophisticated
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:24:08 +0200
Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
Under valgrind, I get no interesting message, except that I have X
Errors (that I cannot parse :( ) and an assertion.
It is bad, but I have no idea about what it is.
I got another crash, where LyX pops up a
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:01:56 +0100
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
I got another crash, where LyX pops up a info box
LyX has caught an exception, it will now attempt to save all unsaved
documents and exit.
And another one. This time, same Sweave document with no typo, I simply
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:08:14 +0100
Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
And another one. This time, same Sweave document with no typo, I
Yet another backtrace. This time Sweave wasn't involved, and I only
tried to compile a very simple document. See attached.
Liviu*** glibc detected ***
Dear devels
I'm getting regular crashes in alpha5, something I didn't encounter
in previous alpha releases. I'll start posting crash messages here,
when they happen. I attach the backtrace of the latest crash.
Regards
Liviu 4 : keep.source term tex
Error: chunk 4
Error in cat(list(...), file,
Liviu Andronic writes:
> Dear devels
> I'm getting regular crashes in alpha5, something I didn't encounter
> in previous alpha releases. I'll start posting crash messages here,
> when they happen. I attach the backtrace of the latest crash.
This would be more usable if
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:28:50 +0100
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear devels
> I'm getting regular crashes in alpha5, something I didn't encounter
> in previous alpha releases. I'll start posting crash messages here,
> when they happen. I attach the backtrace of the latest crash.
Liviu Andronic writes:
> Now I've got a freeze. Here are the last debug lines:
> Liviu
>
> [..]
> 4 : keep.source term tex
>
> Error: chunk 4
> Error in parse(text = chunk) : unexpected '}' in:
> "cat("\\newpage{}")
> }"
Is the problem related to the fact that
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:27:03 +0200
Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> Is the problem related to the fact that you have a SWeave error?
>
I am not very sure (since I'm currently working only on Sweave
documents), but it seems so. Thinking about it, I was actually
getting crashes in
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:41:57 +0100
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> I don't know if this is reproducible, but the attached document caused
> a crash here. I compiled via pdflatex. Does this help or should I
> attempt more sophisticated debugging?
>
Because of the crash I didn't
Liviu Andronic writes:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:41:57 +0100
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> I don't know if this is reproducible, but the attached document caused
>> a crash here. I compiled via pdflatex. Does this help or should I
>> attempt more
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:24:08 +0200
Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> Under valgrind, I get no interesting message, except that I have X
> Errors (that I cannot parse :( ) and an assertion.
>
> It is bad, but I have no idea about what it is.
>
I got another crash, where LyX pops
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:01:56 +0100
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> I got another crash, where LyX pops up a info box
> "LyX has caught an exception, it will now attempt to save all unsaved
> documents and exit.
>
And another one. This time, same Sweave document with no typo, I
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:08:14 +0100
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> And another one. This time, same Sweave document with no typo, I
>
Yet another backtrace. This time Sweave wasn't involved, and I only
tried to compile a very simple document. See attached.
Liviu*** glibc detected
38 matches
Mail list logo