Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2016, 22:57 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Should I open a ticket for this?
Yes, please.
> I would prefer that someone else do so
> because I don't understand the LaTeX details discussed.
Nobody fully understands them yet AFAICS. You can just refer to this
thread.
Jürg
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:59:04PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2016, 22:57 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Should I open a ticket for this?
>
> Yes, please.
>
> > I would prefer that someone else do so
> > because I don't understand the LaTeX details discussed.
>
Many of our documents have custom Math options which I think are
unnecessary for the most part. For example, the Tutorial has everything
set to "Do not load", except for mathdots and mhchem. Setting everything
to "Automatic" does not change compilation. I wonder these options might
have been set by
On 2016-10-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --]
> Many of our documents have custom Math options which I think are
> unnecessary for the most part. For example, the Tutorial has everything
> set to "Do not load", except for mathdots and mhchem. Setting everything
> to
Le 7 octobre 2016 19:01:26 CEST, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>Many of our documents have custom Math options which I think are
>unnecessary for the most part. For example, the Tutorial has everything
>set to "Do not load", except for mathdots and mhchem. Setting
>everything
>to "Automatic" does no
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:00:09PM +0200, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
> Sure, I mentioned in a previous thread that it could trigger an error e.g.
> in splash.lyx.
Indeed, I think I stole the idea from you:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=caa2c11f-2c40-f782-6193-df1667b981a3%40f
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:53:13PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> It does not suffice to test whether compilation runs without an error.
> This does in no way guarantee that the output is OK.
I see. I suppose it comes down to whether we think that the proposed
changes have a better chance of fixin
The attached patch is simple but I have not made a change like this
before so I wanted to check on the list.
Scott
From 3afb01f8b005bbd28109dec80de3a9d368de9003 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Kostyshak
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 23:18:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Factor out magic zoom minimum to a