Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-12 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 12/08/2017 10:21, Guenter Milde wrote: This may change if we develop an "all inclusive" LyX document format. I used to remember a discussion about that, to the point to be mistakenly believing we did support an inclusive/embedded .lyx format, but I'm likely not remembering well, or

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-08-11, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> My answer was about the first part of the question: whether Postscript >> code can be *embedded* in the LyX document. > I have no clue what are you asking about then... P I was not asking but answering Christians question in the subject

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Guess this is the standard. So, would we need the attached patch ? Please check with windows people as well. This is very touchy thing in our conversion chain & widely used -- it would be major regression if we suddenly do not produce pdf file for documents with

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guenter Milde wrote: > My answer was about the first part of the question: whether Postscript > code can be *embedded* in the LyX document. I have no clue what are you asking about then... P

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-10 Thread Christian Ridderström
On 10 August 2017 at 11:02, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 09/08/2017 09:05, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For EPS to PDF this means we could preferably use "repstopdf" instead of >> "epstopdf". >> >>"repstopdf" is the version "whitelisted" in texmf.cnf for use with the >>

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-10 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 10/08/2017 11:02, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 09/08/2017 09:05, Guenter Milde wrote: For EPS to PDF this means we could preferably use "repstopdf" instead of "epstopdf". "repstopdf" is the version "whitelisted" in texmf.cnf for use with the restricted shell access. On my Debian

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-10 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 09/08/2017 09:05, Guenter Milde wrote: For EPS to PDF this means we could preferably use "repstopdf" instead of "epstopdf". "repstopdf" is the version "whitelisted" in texmf.cnf for use with the restricted shell access. On my Debian system, it is just a symlink to epstopdf:

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-09 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-08-06, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> > Q1: Can postscript (PS) code be embedded in a LyX document in such a >> > way such that it's parsed when doing a preview, or exporting a >> > document? >> Not usually. > If you export to pdf then you need to convert each eps to pdf

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-06 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guenter Milde wrote: > > Q1: Can postscript (PS) code be embedded in a LyX document in such a way > > such that it's parsed when doing a preview, or exporting a document? > > Not usually. If you export to pdf then you need to convert each eps to pdf first and there it gets parsed. For viewing

Re: Can postscript code be embedded in a LyX document?

2017-08-05 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-08-04, Christian Ridderström wrote: Hej Christian, > Q1: Can postscript (PS) code be embedded in a LyX document in such a way > such that it's parsed when doing a preview, or exporting a document? Not usually. > Q2: Can PS code only be included by embedding a graphics inset