On 12/08/2017 10:21, Guenter Milde wrote:
This may change if we develop an "all inclusive" LyX document format.
I used to remember a discussion about that, to the point to be mistakenly
believing we did support an inclusive/embedded .lyx format, but I'm likely not
remembering well, or
On 2017-08-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> My answer was about the first part of the question: whether Postscript
>> code can be *embedded* in the LyX document.
> I have no clue what are you asking about then... P
I was not asking but answering Christians question in the subject
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Guess this is the standard. So, would we need the attached patch ?
Please check with windows people as well. This is very touchy thing in our
conversion chain & widely used -- it would be major regression if we suddenly
do not produce pdf file for documents with
Guenter Milde wrote:
> My answer was about the first part of the question: whether Postscript
> code can be *embedded* in the LyX document.
I have no clue what are you asking about then... P
On 10 August 2017 at 11:02, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 09:05, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
>> For EPS to PDF this means we could preferably use "repstopdf" instead of
>> "epstopdf".
>>
>>"repstopdf" is the version "whitelisted" in texmf.cnf for use with the
>>
On 10/08/2017 11:02, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 09/08/2017 09:05, Guenter Milde wrote:
For EPS to PDF this means we could preferably use "repstopdf" instead of
"epstopdf".
"repstopdf" is the version "whitelisted" in texmf.cnf for use with the
restricted shell access.
On my Debian
On 09/08/2017 09:05, Guenter Milde wrote:
For EPS to PDF this means we could preferably use "repstopdf" instead of
"epstopdf".
"repstopdf" is the version "whitelisted" in texmf.cnf for use with the
restricted shell access.
On my Debian system, it is just a symlink to epstopdf:
On 2017-08-06, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> > Q1: Can postscript (PS) code be embedded in a LyX document in such a
>> > way such that it's parsed when doing a preview, or exporting a
>> > document?
>> Not usually.
> If you export to pdf then you need to convert each eps to pdf
Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Q1: Can postscript (PS) code be embedded in a LyX document in such a way
> > such that it's parsed when doing a preview, or exporting a document?
>
> Not usually.
If you export to pdf then you need to convert each eps to pdf first and there
it gets parsed. For viewing
On 2017-08-04, Christian Ridderström wrote:
Hej Christian,
> Q1: Can postscript (PS) code be embedded in a LyX document in such a way
> such that it's parsed when doing a preview, or exporting a document?
Not usually.
> Q2: Can PS code only be included by embedding a graphics inset
10 matches
Mail list logo