Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-03-01 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 1-3-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef:

Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck:


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ 
)


I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new 
server is known to be stable.


Can you please delete the old installer from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.3/

Currently it is a bit confusing.

thanks and regards
Uwe


Richard, could you also indicate that the installer is still not the 
'official' one ? I'm trying to build the official one right now.


Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-03-01 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 1-3-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef:

Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck:


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ 
)


I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new 
server is known to be stable.


Can you please delete the old installer from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.3/

Currently it is a bit confusing.

thanks and regards
Uwe


Richard, could you also indicate that the installer is still not the 
'official' one ? I'm trying to build the official one right now.


Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-29 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
 Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda:

 The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
 svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
 able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
 the 'current' official one?

 It is the code that is in SVN trunk. It is a merge of Joost's and my 
 installer. It has almost all features of both installers. I also added some 
 more things like support for Gnumeric etc. It also contains some bugfixes.
 But as in every merge, the result will not be 1 + 2 = 3. Some of my 
 features are replaced by a slightly different one from Joost and vice 
 versa.

Great. Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-29 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/28/2012 06:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck:


They've been downloaded.


As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first 
installer version, I think that linking to my installer instead of 
putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better.


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ 
)


I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new 
server is known to be stable.


Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-29 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck:


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ )


I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new server is 
known to be stable.


Can you please delete the old installer from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.3/

Currently it is a bit confusing.

thanks and regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-29 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
>> svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
>> able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
>> the 'current' official one?
>
> It is the code that is in SVN trunk. It is a merge of Joost's and my 
> installer. It has almost all features of both installers. I also added some 
> more things like support for Gnumeric etc. It also contains some bugfixes.
> But as in every merge, the result will not be 1 + 2 = 3. Some of my 
> features are replaced by a slightly different one from Joost and vice 
> versa.

Great. Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-29 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/28/2012 06:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck:


They've been downloaded.


As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first 
installer version, I think that linking to my installer instead of 
putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better.


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ 
)


I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new 
server is known to be stable.


Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-29 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck:


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ )


I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new server is 
known to be stable.


Can you please delete the old installer from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.3/

Currently it is a bit confusing.

thanks and regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
 Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?

 It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I 
 would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented 
 everything you complained about the last time.

The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
the 'current' official one?

Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 28-2-2012 12:06, Pavel Sanda schreef:

Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?

It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I
would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented
everything you complained about the last time.

The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
the 'current' official one?


The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' 
which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.


Vincent


Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
 The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' 
 which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.

Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well?
Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 



Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/

I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit.

It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one.

Any testing and comments are welcome.


I want to extensively test this before launching this as the 'official' 
installer.


Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 28-2-2012 12:49, Pavel Sanda schreef:

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:

The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative'
which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.

Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well?
Pavel


Pretty much yes, but not today.

Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda:


The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
the 'current' official one?


It is the code that is in SVN trunk. It is a merge of Joost's and my installer. It has almost all 
features of both installers. I also added some more things like support for Gnumeric etc. It also 
contains some bugfixes.
But as in every merge, the result will not be 1 + 2 = 3. Some of my features are replaced by a 
slightly different one from Joost and vice versa.


regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 13:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:


Any testing and comments are welcome.


I want to extensively test this before launching this as the 'official' 
installer.


As said this is not completely ready to go official. it is close but there might be issues. For 
example I just found a major uninstall issue and therefore released a new installer (that also comes 
now with Ghostscript 9.05):

https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/

regards Uwe

p.s. lyx.org is dead

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck:


They've been downloaded.


As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first installer version, I think that 
linking to my installer instead of putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better.


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ )

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 



p.s. lyx.org is dead


Sometimes I wonder whether you actually read the Lyx developers' list ?

(hint: look for an email with the subject: Reminder: Downtime for lyx 
server - today)


Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?
>
> It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I 
> would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented 
> everything you complained about the last time.

The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
the 'current' official one?

Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 28-2-2012 12:06, Pavel Sanda schreef:

Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?

It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I
would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented
everything you complained about the last time.

The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
the 'current' official one?


The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' 
which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.


Vincent


Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative' 
> which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.

Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well?
Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 



Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/

I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit.

It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one.

Any testing and comments are welcome.


I want to extensively test this before launching this as the 'official' 
installer.


Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 28-2-2012 12:49, Pavel Sanda schreef:

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:

The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative'
which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.

Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well?
Pavel


Pretty much yes, but not today.

Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda:


The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
the 'current' official one?


It is the code that is in SVN trunk. It is a merge of Joost's and my installer. It has almost all 
features of both installers. I also added some more things like support for Gnumeric etc. It also 
contains some bugfixes.
But as in every merge, the result will not be 1 + 2 = 3. Some of my features are replaced by a 
slightly different one from Joost and vice versa.


regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 13:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:


Any testing and comments are welcome.


I want to extensively test this before launching this as the 'official' 
installer.


As said this is not completely ready to go official. it is close but there might be issues. For 
example I just found a major uninstall issue and therefore released a new installer (that also comes 
now with Ghostscript 9.05):

https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/

regards Uwe

p.s. lyx.org is dead

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck:


They've been downloaded.


As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first installer version, I think that 
linking to my installer instead of putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better.


(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ )

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 



p.s. lyx.org is dead


Sometimes I wonder whether you actually read the Lyx developers' list ?

(hint: look for an email with the subject: "Reminder: Downtime for lyx 
server - today")


Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 27-2-2012 1:59, Uwe Stöhr schreef:

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries?


I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around 
with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.)


Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?

Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/27/2012 01:04 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:

Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only?

Richard


For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig

and for Tiger it's:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg.sig

Got em. Thanks.

Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/26/2012 07:59 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries?


I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around 
with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.)



or should I just release the source only?


We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary.

I'll wait another day, but I don't see the point of delaying the release 
any further.


Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Anders Ekberg 
Can verify that it works fine on Mac OSX 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard).
Thanks!
/Anders

On 2012-02-27 07.04, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:

Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:

 Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the
source only?
 
 Richard
 

For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig

and for Tiger it's:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg.sig

Stephan

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 27.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Richard Heck:


We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary.


I'll wait another day, but I don't see the point of delaying the release any 
further.


Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/

I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit.

It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one. The only thing that is now missing 
is that you still need admin privileges to install LyX, but work is in progress with the ImageMagick 
people to make this possible.


Any testing and comments are welcome.

regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 27.02.2012 12:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:


Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?


It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you 
could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you complained about the last time.


regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:


Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/


Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were truncated. I re-uploaded them 
again and they are now complete.


regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Yihui Xie 
I tested it quickly under Windows 7, and it worked fine. Thanks!

Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie xieyi...@gmail.com
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA



On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:

 Here is my installer:
 https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/

 I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit.

 It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one. The only
 thing that is now missing is that you still need admin privileges to install
 LyX, but work is in progress with the ImageMagick people to make this
 possible.

 Any testing and comments are welcome.

 regards
 Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/27/2012 07:14 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:


Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/


Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were 
truncated. I re-uploaded them again and they are now complete.


Sorry, I'm a little unclear about this. What files exactly need to go 
onto the ftp site? Any of them? Or should I just link to sourceforge and 
let people download the file from there?


Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Op 27-2-2012 1:59, Uwe Stöhr schreef:

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries?


I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around 
with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.)


Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?

Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/27/2012 01:04 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:

Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only?

Richard


For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig

and for Tiger it's:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg.sig

Got em. Thanks.

Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/26/2012 07:59 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries?


I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around 
with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.)



or should I just release the source only?


We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary.

I'll wait another day, but I don't see the point of delaying the release 
any further.


Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Anders Ekberg 
Can verify that it works fine on Mac OSX 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard).
Thanks!
/Anders

On 2012-02-27 07.04, "Stephan Witt"  wrote:

>Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the
>>source only?
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>
>For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:
>
>http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
>http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig
>
>and for Tiger it's:
>http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg
>http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg.sig
>
>Stephan

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 27.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Richard Heck:


We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary.


I'll wait another day, but I don't see the point of delaying the release any 
further.


Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/

I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit.

It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one. The only thing that is now missing 
is that you still need admin privileges to install LyX, but work is in progress with the ImageMagick 
people to make this possible.


Any testing and comments are welcome.

regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 27.02.2012 12:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:


Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?


It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you 
could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you complained about the last time.


regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:


Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/


Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were truncated. I re-uploaded them 
again and they are now complete.


regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Yihui Xie 
I tested it quickly under Windows 7, and it worked fine. Thanks!

Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie 
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA



On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Uwe Stöhr  wrote:
>
> Here is my installer:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
>
> I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit.
>
> It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one. The only
> thing that is now missing is that you still need admin privileges to install
> LyX, but work is in progress with the ImageMagick people to make this
> possible.
>
> Any testing and comments are welcome.
>
> regards
> Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Heck 

On 02/27/2012 07:14 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:


Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/


Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were 
truncated. I re-uploaded them again and they are now complete.


Sorry, I'm a little unclear about this. What files exactly need to go 
onto the ftp site? Any of them? Or should I just link to sourceforge and 
let people download the file from there?


Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Liviu Andronic 
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
 Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source
 only?

Ubuntu binaries are already available on the PPA.

Liviu

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Richard Heck wrote:
 Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source 
 only?

If interested parties were not able to build binaries in the timeframe
of one week there is no point to wait more.

Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries?


I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus 
my delay.)



or should I just release the source only?


We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary.

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Stephan Witt 
Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:

 Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only?
 
 Richard
 

For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig

and for Tiger it's:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg.sig

Stephan

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Liviu Andronic 
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Richard Heck  wrote:
> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source
> only?
>
Ubuntu binaries are already available on the PPA.

Liviu

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Pavel Sanda 
Richard Heck wrote:
> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source 
> only?

If interested parties were not able to build binaries in the timeframe
of one week there is no point to wait more.

Pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr 

Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:


Anyone planning to produce binaries?


I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus 
my delay.)



or should I just release the source only?


We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary.

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.3 Binaries?

2012-02-26 Thread Stephan Witt 
Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:

> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only?
> 
> Richard
> 

For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig

and for Tiger it's:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-tiger.dmg.sig

Stephan