Re: Modules dialogue

2016-10-25 17:13 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck : > This assumes (!) that the Assumption style is mentioned in the > description, which it might be. It would be possible, but a whole lot > more complicated, to filter on the styles, etc, that are declared in the > module (if any). > Or

Re: Modules dialogue

On 10/25/2016 09:58 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > On 10/25/2016 12:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> I think the right approach to fix this is to use categories, like we >> have in layouts (the interface is already implemented also for >> modules). This would make it easier to find the module you

Re: Modules dialogue

On 10/25/2016 12:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I think the right approach to fix this is to use categories, like we have in layouts (the interface is already implemented also for modules). This would make it easier to find the module you are looking for (without knowing the exact name, which

Re: Modules dialogue

On 25/10/2016 5:14 p.m., Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2016, 08:55 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: My concern was for the list of modules to be scannable "at a glance". You rightly pointed out in your first post that "the modules dialogue [...] looks as if it has outgrown

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2016, 08:55 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > My concern was for the list of modules to be scannable "at a > glance".  > Particularly with the theorems modules there is a clump of them, > some  > with long names where the distinguishable part of the name is not  > initially

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 21:51 +0200 schrieb racoon: Ah, I have not made the settings dialog wide enough. Well anyway, the right part does not become wider up to a certain point (see attached screenshot). I would call that wasted space. So maybe the list of settings should be set to a

Re: Modules dialogue

On 25/10/2016 5:53 a.m., Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon: Sorry, probably the attached is better. I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order (which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the descriptions

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 20:33, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 20:21 +0200 schrieb racoon: Another idea would be to make not the list of document settings expand when one expands the settings dialog. All the settings names already fit well into the list. So it would make more sense

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 20:21 +0200 schrieb racoon: > Another idea would be to make not the list of document settings > expand  > when one expands the settings dialog. All the settings names already > fit  > well into the list. So it would make more sense to expand the > individual  > settings

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 20:08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 19:36 +0200 schrieb racoon: Can you give an example? Citation dialog. Oh, I see. Haven't thought about non-settings/preferences dialogs. But since those are in quite different areas of LyX I would not mind to have

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 19:36 +0200 schrieb racoon: > Can you give an example? Citation dialog. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 18:53, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon: Sorry, probably the attached is better. I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order (which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the descriptions to

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon: > Sorry, probably the attached is better. I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order (which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the descriptions to multiple lines. Jürgen > > Daniel >

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 13:15, racoon wrote: On 24.10.2016 12:53, racoon wrote: On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Few documents have more than a module or five attached to them. Most of the Selected window is wasted space. I wonder if the two Defaults buttons in the penultimate row couldn't be

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 12:53, racoon wrote: On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Few documents have more than a module or five attached to them. Most of the Selected window is wasted space. I wonder if the two Defaults buttons in the penultimate row couldn't be shrunk to fit into the gap in the

Re: Modules dialogue

On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote: In an earlier email I managed to overlook the Assumption environment, provided in the Theorems-AMS-Extended module, as Paul indicated. OK, more of this kind of thing is to be expected as I enter my dotage, but when I view the modules dialogue it looks