On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:07:45AM +, David Pesetsky wrote:
> I see — the discussion seems to have gotten a bit confused around eight years
> ago, but the discussion around three years ago hits the nail on the head. It
> should work this way in "replace all", and not in simple find or
>
I see — the discussion seems to have gotten a bit confused around eight years
ago, but the discussion around three years ago hits the nail on the head. It
should work this way in "replace all", and not in simple find or find-replace.
I am not a member of the Lyx team, obviously, so not part
On 08/06/2017 06:52 PM, David Pesetsky wrote:
I just learned the (very) hard way that Lyx, unlike standard word processors and other
text-manipulating software that I've used, does not limit the effect of "replace
all" to selected text (when something has been selected).
Am I unaware of some
I just learned the (very) hard way that Lyx, unlike standard word processors
and other text-manipulating software that I've used, does not limit the effect
of "replace all" to selected text (when something has been selected).
Am I unaware of some switch that can change this behavior, perhaps —
