> On Feb 3, 2023, at 9:06 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Hal Kierstead via lyx-users wrote:
I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Hal Kierstead via lyx-users wrote:
> >> I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that
> >> ???Acknowledgment??? is suggested in the amsthm instructions???just like
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Hal Kierstead via lyx-users wrote:
> I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that
> ???Acknowledgment??? is suggested in the amsthm instructions???just like
> ???Lemma".
Ha :)
Can you point me to any paper of yours, where this
> On Feb 3, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
>> "AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
>> this.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
> "AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
> this.
...
>(a) expressing gratefulness (credits, as in the
Am Mittwoch, dem 01.02.2023 um 16:13 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> If you use or are familiar with the Acknowledgment theorem type: what
> are its general purposes, or how do you use it?
Clarification comes from AMS technical support (thanks Pavel for
approaching them):
An
