How can one write block matrices with dashed or thin lines separating
the blocks? I'm aware of the LaTeX package easybmat. I was wondering
if there is anything available within LyX.
Thanks in advance for the help!
Atul
How can one write block matrices with dashed or thin lines separating
the blocks? I'm aware of the LaTeX package easybmat. I was wondering
if there is anything available within LyX.
Thanks in advance for the help!
Atul
How can one write block matrices with dashed or thin lines separating
the blocks? I'm aware of the LaTeX package "easybmat". I was wondering
if there is anything available within LyX.
Thanks in advance for the help!
Atul
help!
Atul
--
Atul Narang
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
PHONE: 352 392 0028
FAX: 352 392 9513
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help!
Atul
--
Atul Narang
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
PHONE: 352 392 0028
FAX: 352 392 9513
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help!
Atul
--
Atul Narang
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
PHONE: 352 392 0028
FAX: 352 392 9513
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RevTex uses natbib, which is quite capable of
providing the references in the format I am seeking, I
thought there must be a way of getting it to work.
Atul
--- Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Atul Narang wrote:
If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the
preamble, I
get a series of errors
Guenter,
I changed the aps.sty file. It made no difference -
RevTeX retains its default style.
Atul
--- Guenter Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:13:44 -0800 (PST) wrote Atul
Narang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Herbert,
If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the
preamble, I
RevTex uses natbib, which is quite capable of
providing the references in the format I am seeking, I
thought there must be a way of getting it to work.
Atul
--- Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Atul Narang wrote:
If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the
preamble, I
get a series of errors
Guenter,
I changed the aps.sty file. It made no difference -
RevTeX retains its default style.
Atul
--- Guenter Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:13:44 -0800 (PST) wrote Atul
Narang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Herbert,
If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the
preamble, I
RevTex uses natbib, which is quite capable of
providing the references in the format I am seeking, I
thought there must be a way of getting it to work.
Atul
--- Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Atul Narang wrote:
>
> > If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the
> preambl
Guenter,
I changed the aps.sty file. It made no difference -
RevTeX retains its default style.
Atul
--- Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:13:44 -0800 (PST) wrote Atul
> Narang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Herbert,
>
> &g
Is it possible to use RevTex with a nonstandard .bst
file?
I am using RevTex (it has some nice features), but I
would like the bibliography to appear like it does in
Journal of Theoretical Biology,
ie.,
1. The references should appear in the format (Jones,
1990; Jones and Smith, 1991)
2. The
Herbert,
If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the preamble, I
get a series of errors. If I say plain in the box
BibTex Generated References, nothing happens - the
default RevTex format persists.
Atul
RevTeX
--- Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Atul Narang wrote:
Is it possible
Is it possible to use RevTex with a nonstandard .bst
file?
I am using RevTex (it has some nice features), but I
would like the bibliography to appear like it does in
Journal of Theoretical Biology,
ie.,
1. The references should appear in the format (Jones,
1990; Jones and Smith, 1991)
2. The
Herbert,
If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the preamble, I
get a series of errors. If I say plain in the box
BibTex Generated References, nothing happens - the
default RevTex format persists.
Atul
RevTeX
--- Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Atul Narang wrote:
Is it possible
Is it possible to use RevTex with a "nonstandard" .bst
file?
I am using RevTex (it has some nice features), but I
would like the bibliography to appear like it does in
Journal of Theoretical Biology,
ie.,
1. The references should appear in the format (Jones,
1990; Jones and Smith, 1991)
2. The
Herbert,
If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the preamble, I
get a series of errors. If I say plain in the box
"BibTex Generated References", nothing happens - the
default RevTex format persists.
Atul
RevTeX
--- Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
18 matches
Mail list logo