On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > add: "#!
>
> Problem with this approach is of course that one needs to know the full
> path to the LyX binary...
>
> Andre'
Nahh
#! /usr/bin/env lyx
john
--
"I hear you have four hundred and eighty six PCs for sale ?"
- Some Fool
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Jeroen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> It seems I have a problem here :)
> I'm trying to compile lyx-1.1.6fix1, configure works fine but make drops out
> on me.
> ../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive `Object' introduced
> ambiguous type `_ObjectRec *'
> make[3]: *** [formula.lo
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> Of course, xdvi shows the EPS figures. I am using GhostScript 6.50.
> Surely I am doing something wrong... or not?
Yes, ghostscript 6.50 has a bug. You will need to back down
to 5.50, or perhaps try 6.60 (see
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alexandru Mustatea wrote:
> This is my first post on this list, I hope I won't break any
> rule... Also, please excuse my English, I'm not a native English speaker.
> Every time I start lyx, it crashes after displaying the main
> window and just before displaying
On 13 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Stephen Carville wrote:
> |
> | > They do appear to be the correct headers. Where should they be? I
> | > can create symlinks to prevent this problem a
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Stephen Carville wrote:
> They do appear to be the correct headers. Where should they be? I
> can create symlinks to prevent this problem again.
Did you upgrade from a previous Mandrake by any chance ? And did you install
the contents of CD2 ?
john
--
"Having Outlook se
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> Sure. And I think the find dialog should not actually accept LaTeX command
> (at least not necessarily) but instead the user could search and replace
> for styles too, not just character strings (I think some other word
> processors can actually do th
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Friedemann Baitinger wrote:
> And still I'd consider this process a step backward compared to
> LyX-1.1.5 where it was possible to use the GUI to adjust the font size
> and other characteristics. I'm afraid the same ugly method has to be
> used in order to change other attribu
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Dumas Patrice wrote:
> Hi,
>
> configuration put lyx 1.1.6fix1 by default in /usr. I think it would be
> better if it was in /usr/local (a personnal desire, feel free to discard
> it, but all the other softs I ever installed with ./configure;make;make
> install were installed
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Friedemann Baitinger wrote:
> Where? I have read that a few times and about the only thing related
> reads like: (using '|' to quote from 'INSTALL')
o if you get an error message when compiling LyX that looks like this :
../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive `Obj
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Friedemann Baitinger wrote:
> on lyx.org in the context of describing the newly released 1.1.6fix1 it
> was stated that compile problems on RH 7.0 have been removed, however, I
> still can't compile the thing on my pretty much standard RH
> 7.0. ./configure runs through withou
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
> PS : The strip version takes only 8Mo, vs 40Mo for the regular one. What
> makes this difference ? Could you tell me more ?
An unstripped binary contains debugging symbols. This is needed if you
experience a LyX bug that causes it to crash, in order
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Florian Cramer wrote:
> While it was never possible to control each and every function/popu in LyX
> through keyboard commands, chances have considerably decreased since tabbed
> dialogues were introduced in LyX 1.1.6x. I therefore have to admit my
> somewhat mixed feelings ab
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Mohammad Reza Danesh wrote:
> I got the same error messages with RH 7.0 trying to upgrade to Fix-1.
>
> -M
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Cazzolato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:56 PM
> To: LyX Users
> Subject: LyX 1.1.6fix1 RPM
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > You need a valid unit with the integer. Eg, "1 cm", "2 em", "3 mm" etc.
>
> Maybe we should offer a choice-box with the units available?
>
> But then again can margins have rubber lengths?
>
> Allan. (ARRa
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to have a search-function similar to the emacs search?
>
> I want to jump to the search-string simply typing "C-s search-string
> RET". With the given search-panel I have to use the mouse.
>
>
> Ciao!
> juh
Am I right in
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
> You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
> with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
> 0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
need to, which breaks the
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
> Ok folks, I give up. I can't build 1.1.6. I know, I know, it's not rocket
> science. Take your best shot and then maybe help me out?
>
> ./configure in the lyx-1.1.6 directory gets me "cannot find libforms or
> libxforms - cannot find forms.h"
>
> I got the l
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, alex wrote:
> Hi LyX people!
>
> Just a little question: I'd like to have a LyX icon on my desktop to
> quickly launch the program! Doesn't the LyX team have released anyone?
>
> The INSTALL readme file in the source package of lyx-1.1.6 tells about
> an icon (lyx.xpm) that
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to have LyX use a default measure unit,
> when not typing it explicitly? Let that be adjustable in the lyxrc file
> and in preferences.
hmm, not sure about that. Maybe. The real way to fix it is to have a combo
box of the units, lik
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, vinicius provenzano wrote:
> I'm with GNU Ghostscript 5.50 here. What would I get if I upgrade to Alladin
> Ghostscript 6.50? Would I have any upgrade I should care to download?
What you would get is the inability to see your figures within LyX. There
is a bug in Ghostscrip
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Ronald Florence wrote:
> It also appears that the stock Solaris make fails with the lyx-1.1.6
> makefiles. Gnumake seems to be working. This might warrant mention
> in the documentation as a requirement for compilation.
Yes, it requires GNU Make. In 1.1.6fix1 this requirem
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, James Sinnamon wrote:
> Dear LyX users,
>
> I feel as if I am at my wit's end trying to find a vector drwaing
> program which allow me to create drawings which I can export as eps
> files for
> inclusion in a LyX document. I may have no alternative, but to use
> xfig, but it
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matej Cepl wrote:
> At 10:06 PM 12/25/2000 +0100, Javier Nieto Esteban wrote:
> >Hi,
> > I'm an Spanish newbie user of Lyx (really, I use Klyx in my
> > Mandrake Linux).
>
>
> I have read something about re-emergence of KLyX in LDN, but I did not
> understood it w
On 16 Dec 2000, Stefano Ghirlanda wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Stefano Ghirlanda wrote:
> > > Hi, I do not know wheter this is a bug in LyX or LaTeX/TeX, but
> > > is seems that documents whose full path contains spaces cannot be
> > > typeset. For instance I see thi
A couple of users reported that they couldn't get recent Ghostscript
versions to work with LyX with displaying figures inline. It transpires
this is a Ghostscript bug
http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=124957&group_id=1897
This bug appears to affect 6.22 upwards.
Hopefully a bu
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Armin Geisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after upgrading to ghostscript 6.50, lyx1.1.5fix2 and the latest
> cvs-version don't render eps-pictures any more.
>
> Anybody else suffering the same problem ?
>
> Cheers
> Armin
I've just confirmed this happens with lyx 1.0.4 (yep, that's ho
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Idar Tollefsen wrote:
> >after upgrading to ghostscript 6.50, lyx1.1.5fix2 and the latest
> >cvs-version don't render eps-pictures any more.
> >Anybody else suffering the same problem ?
>
> Some of the same. I'm running the Win32 port of LyX 1.1.5fix2
> and using Ghostscript
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Does anybody know about something like %subj% for Linux? If
> there already is such animal, are there plans for its linking to
> LyX (in similar manner as [ia]spell is)?
>
> Thanx
>
> Matej
>
not as far as I'm aware. The only
601 - 629 of 629 matches
Mail list logo