On Thursday 27 July 2006 21:48, Rich Shepard wrote:
I apologize for not remembering how to preview a beamer presentation
that includes .eps graphics. It has been several months since I last wrote
a set of slides, and nothing I've tried works. I searched the beamer manual
and my e-mail file
On Thursday 27 July 2006 21:48, Rich Shepard wrote:
I apologize for not remembering how to preview a beamer presentation
that includes .eps graphics. It has been several months since I last wrote
a set of slides, and nothing I've tried works. I searched the beamer manual
and my e-mail file
On Thursday 27 July 2006 21:48, Rich Shepard wrote:
>I apologize for not remembering how to preview a beamer presentation
> that includes .eps graphics. It has been several months since I last wrote
> a set of slides, and nothing I've tried works. I searched the beamer manual
> and my e-mail
On Friday 28 July 2006 14:29, Rich Shepard wrote:
For the logo you need the full path, but I guess you are doing that
already.
Hi, Jose',
Yes. The full path is given, and there is no extenstion to the file
name.
I have just confirmed that it works for me. :-(
I have the logo as a
On Friday 28 July 2006 14:29, Rich Shepard wrote:
For the logo you need the full path, but I guess you are doing that
already.
Hi, Jose',
Yes. The full path is given, and there is no extenstion to the file
name.
I have just confirmed that it works for me. :-(
I have the logo as a
On Friday 28 July 2006 14:29, Rich Shepard wrote:
> For the logo you need the full path, but I guess you are doing that
> already.
>
> Hi, Jose',
>
> Yes. The full path is given, and there is no extenstion to the file
> name.
I have just confirmed that it works for me. :-(
I have the
On Thursday 27 July 2006 22:07, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Rich Shepard wrote:
I apologize for not remembering how to preview a beamer presentation
that includes .eps graphics. It has been several months since I last
wrote a set of slides, and nothing I've tried works. I
On Thursday 27 July 2006 22:07, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Rich Shepard wrote:
I apologize for not remembering how to preview a beamer presentation
that includes .eps graphics. It has been several months since I last
wrote a set of slides, and nothing I've tried works. I
On Thursday 27 July 2006 22:07, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Rich Shepard wrote:
> > I apologize for not remembering how to preview a beamer presentation
> > that includes .eps graphics. It has been several months since I last
> > wrote a set of slides, and nothing I've tried works.
On Thursday 20 July 2006 23:02, Stephen Smethurst wrote:
***
* So I tried with YUM:
***
$ yum install lyx
What are the enabled repositories in yum configuration?
We have several computers running lyx in FC-4 with no problem, both
installing and updating.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 20 July 2006 23:02, Stephen Smethurst wrote:
***
* So I tried with YUM:
***
$ yum install lyx
What are the enabled repositories in yum configuration?
We have several computers running lyx in FC-4 with no problem, both
installing and updating.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 20 July 2006 23:02, Stephen Smethurst wrote:
> ***
> * So I tried with YUM:
> ***
> $ yum install lyx
What are the enabled repositories in yum configuration?
We have several computers running lyx in FC-4 with no problem, both
installing and updating.
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 16 July 2006 23:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I do not think the Windows installer has a Beamer layout at all. (Is
there not some issue with licensing?) I use the one that Till Tantau
ships with Beamer.
There is no problem with beamer's license it is the same as LyX (GPL).
On Sunday 16 July 2006 23:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I do not think the Windows installer has a Beamer layout at all. (Is
there not some issue with licensing?) I use the one that Till Tantau
ships with Beamer.
There is no problem with beamer's license it is the same as LyX (GPL).
On Sunday 16 July 2006 23:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I do not think the Windows installer has a Beamer layout at all. (Is
> there not some issue with licensing?) I use the one that Till Tantau
> ships with Beamer.
There is no problem with beamer's license it is the same as LyX (GPL).
On Saturday 15 July 2006 13:33, Georg Baum wrote:
Already there: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700
As soon as finished what I am doing I would like to extend LyX.py to support
some scripting operations over lyx files.
One of the other examples that I have in mind (it should be
On Saturday 15 July 2006 13:33, Georg Baum wrote:
Already there: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700
As soon as finished what I am doing I would like to extend LyX.py to support
some scripting operations over lyx files.
One of the other examples that I have in mind (it should be
On Saturday 15 July 2006 13:33, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> Already there: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700
As soon as finished what I am doing I would like to extend LyX.py to support
some scripting operations over lyx files.
One of the other examples that I have in mind (it should be
On Friday 14 July 2006 17:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the share/lyx/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx.in file for?
It is used to generate the file share/lyx/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx, that depends
on the latex packages installed. You can think of it like a template used to
build the file that can be
On Friday 14 July 2006 17:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am preparing pkgsrc packages (for NetBSD, DragonFly and other operating
systems).
I do the same for Fedora, although I am not the person packaging LyX. Rex
does a far better work than I would do. :-)
What can I do to pregenerate this
On Friday 14 July 2006 23:06, Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
Does anyone have more experience with such programs?
Perhaps I just need to get better organized :)
Could you, please, fill an entry in bugzilla with this request so that it
does not get forgotten?
As soon as I have more
On Friday 14 July 2006 21:54, Sven Schreiber wrote:
mail.k schrieb:
Is the list a gentlemen's club? ...
This list is not, but I guess Rich was addressing the developers (give
him the benefit of doubt...)
Depending on the language you use one of the genders qualifies for the
group.
You
On Friday 14 July 2006 17:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the share/lyx/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx.in file for?
It is used to generate the file share/lyx/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx, that depends
on the latex packages installed. You can think of it like a template used to
build the file that can be
On Friday 14 July 2006 17:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am preparing pkgsrc packages (for NetBSD, DragonFly and other operating
systems).
I do the same for Fedora, although I am not the person packaging LyX. Rex
does a far better work than I would do. :-)
What can I do to pregenerate this
On Friday 14 July 2006 23:06, Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
Does anyone have more experience with such programs?
Perhaps I just need to get better organized :)
Could you, please, fill an entry in bugzilla with this request so that it
does not get forgotten?
As soon as I have more
On Friday 14 July 2006 21:54, Sven Schreiber wrote:
mail.k schrieb:
Is the list a gentlemen's club? ...
This list is not, but I guess Rich was addressing the developers (give
him the benefit of doubt...)
Depending on the language you use one of the genders qualifies for the
group.
You
On Friday 14 July 2006 17:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the share/lyx/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx.in file for?
It is used to generate the file share/lyx/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx, that depends
on the latex packages installed. You can think of it like a template used to
build the file that can be
On Friday 14 July 2006 17:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am preparing pkgsrc packages (for NetBSD, DragonFly and other operating
> systems).
I do the same for Fedora, although I am not the person packaging LyX. Rex
does a far better work than I would do. :-)
> What can I do to pregenerate
On Friday 14 July 2006 23:06, Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
> Does anyone have more experience with such programs?
>
> Perhaps I just need to get better organized :)
Could you, please, fill an entry in bugzilla with this request so that it
does not get forgotten?
As soon as I have more
On Friday 14 July 2006 21:54, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> mail.k schrieb:
> > Is the list a gentlemen's club? ...
>
> This list is not, but I guess Rich was addressing the developers (give
> him the benefit of doubt...)
Depending on the language you use one of the genders qualifies for the
group.
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 08:45, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
I cannot reproduce this either (neither the cases described in the other
mails).
I have finally succeeded with 1.4.2svn
I have inserted two lines with one word and pressed enter to get a third
(empty) line.
While in the last
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 01:29, Steve Harris wrote:
Good day José,
Good day,
After reading your post, I tested again and this is
not fixed in 1.4.2. It isn't much of a bug.
After several trials I succeeded into reproducing the bug, even for
1.4.2.svn.
This is an example line.
{If
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 08:45, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
I cannot reproduce this either (neither the cases described in the other
mails).
I have finally succeeded with 1.4.2svn
I have inserted two lines with one word and pressed enter to get a third
(empty) line.
While in the last
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 01:29, Steve Harris wrote:
Good day José,
Good day,
After reading your post, I tested again and this is
not fixed in 1.4.2. It isn't much of a bug.
After several trials I succeeded into reproducing the bug, even for
1.4.2.svn.
This is an example line.
{If
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 08:45, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> I cannot reproduce this either (neither the cases described in the other
> mails).
I have finally succeeded with 1.4.2svn
I have inserted two lines with one word and pressed enter to get a third
(empty) line.
While in the
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 01:29, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> Good day José,
Good day,
> After reading your post, I tested again and this is
> not fixed in 1.4.2. It isn't much of a bug.
After several trials I succeeded into reproducing the bug, even for
1.4.2.svn.
> This is an example line.
>
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 20:50, Sven Schreiber wrote:
For me the keyboard is not responding in lyx anymore after that. Can
anybody confirm this? Is it known?
I do not remember such bug report. :-(
I would like to hear from other windows users. If the bug is not there it
should be filled in
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 20:50, Sven Schreiber wrote:
For me the keyboard is not responding in lyx anymore after that. Can
anybody confirm this? Is it known?
I do not remember such bug report. :-(
I would like to hear from other windows users. If the bug is not there it
should be filled in
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 20:50, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> For me the keyboard is not responding in lyx anymore after that. Can
> anybody confirm this? Is it known?
I do not remember such bug report. :-(
I would like to hear from other windows users. If the bug is not there it
should be filled
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 15:48, John Coppens wrote:
Hello José.
Should I officially submit this as a bug-report?
Please do. I am busy in the next three weeks and I do not expect to take
care of it before but at least it is not forgotten.
To avoid this notice that manpage_linuxdoc
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 15:48, John Coppens wrote:
Hello José.
Should I officially submit this as a bug-report?
Please do. I am busy in the next three weeks and I do not expect to take
care of it before but at least it is not forgotten.
To avoid this notice that manpage_linuxdoc
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 15:48, John Coppens wrote:
> Hello José.
>
> Should I officially submit this as a bug-report?
Please do. I am busy in the next three weeks and I do not expect to take
care of it before but at least it is not forgotten.
> > To avoid this notice that manpage_linuxdoc
On Monday 26 June 2006 17:22, John Coppens wrote:
Hi all.
I was trying to make a manpage with LyX 1.4.1, so I started a new doc
with the docbook manpage layout. I did a few sections, and exported to
SGML. The generated SGML had an extra '' at the beginning:
---
manpage!-- LyX
On Monday 26 June 2006 17:22, John Coppens wrote:
Hi all.
I was trying to make a manpage with LyX 1.4.1, so I started a new doc
with the docbook manpage layout. I did a few sections, and exported to
SGML. The generated SGML had an extra '' at the beginning:
---
manpage!-- LyX
On Monday 26 June 2006 17:22, John Coppens wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I was trying to make a manpage with LyX 1.4.1, so I started a new doc
> with the docbook manpage layout. I did a few sections, and exported to
> SGML. The generated SGML had an extra '>' at the beginning:
>
> ---
>
>
>
>
On Saturday 24 June 2006 11:57, Subir Singh Lamba wrote:
Hello,
I have compiled and installed lyx-1.4.1. using xforms option on
redhat9.0. Now the problem is symbols are not properly displayed in the
lyx file while they appear properly in .ps or .pdf file. What do I need to
do to overcome
On Friday 23 June 2006 23:03, Rich Shepard wrote:
Why is it that numbered sectioning commands appear both in a
ToC and on the fancy headers, but their unnumbered versions don't? I know
this is a LaTeX action, but I'm wondering why it's this way.
I guess that is by design. :-)
The start
On Saturday 24 June 2006 11:57, Subir Singh Lamba wrote:
Hello,
I have compiled and installed lyx-1.4.1. using xforms option on
redhat9.0. Now the problem is symbols are not properly displayed in the
lyx file while they appear properly in .ps or .pdf file. What do I need to
do to overcome
On Friday 23 June 2006 23:03, Rich Shepard wrote:
Why is it that numbered sectioning commands appear both in a
ToC and on the fancy headers, but their unnumbered versions don't? I know
this is a LaTeX action, but I'm wondering why it's this way.
I guess that is by design. :-)
The start
On Saturday 24 June 2006 11:57, Subir Singh Lamba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have compiled and installed lyx-1.4.1. using xforms option on
> redhat9.0. Now the problem is symbols are not properly displayed in the
> lyx file while they appear properly in .ps or .pdf file. What do I need to
> do to
On Friday 23 June 2006 23:03, Rich Shepard wrote:
>Why is it that numbered sectioning commands appear both in a
> ToC and on the fancy headers, but their unnumbered versions don't? I know
> this is a LaTeX action, but I'm wondering why it's this way.
I guess that is by design. :-)
The
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 09:16, Georg Baum wrote:
The workaround to get svg-pdf conversion is to create an external template
(IIRC more detailed instructions are in the list archive).
Georg I think that here you mean an external inset or am I wrong?
Georg
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 09:16, Georg Baum wrote:
The workaround to get svg-pdf conversion is to create an external template
(IIRC more detailed instructions are in the list archive).
Georg I think that here you mean an external inset or am I wrong?
Georg
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 09:16, Georg Baum wrote:
> The workaround to get svg->pdf conversion is to create an external template
> (IIRC more detailed instructions are in the list archive).
Georg I think that here you mean an external inset or am I wrong?
> Georg
--
José Abílio
On Monday 19 June 2006 12:02, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi,
I'm asking on behalf of one of my users.
I need to include the APA regulations for documents into LyX on a Fedora
Core 5 box. I found several packages, but didn't manage to install it in
an easy and quick way.
I know Fedora and I
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 10:56, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Please add it to bugzilla, if not already done.
Would that change the file format?
Jürgen
PS: Wearing my hat of file format police. ;-)
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:28, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Please add it to bugzilla, if not already done.
Would that change the file format?
Yes.
I was afraid to hear that. You know the rules, this change can only go in
1.5svn. :-(
Jürgen
PS: Wearing my hat
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:02, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
exactly. People are quite excited ATM (though I'm not living in one of
the FIFA occupied cities). But do I have to tell that to a Portuguese?
For us, two years ago - Euro 2004, it was UEFA. :-)
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Monday 19 June 2006 12:02, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi,
I'm asking on behalf of one of my users.
I need to include the APA regulations for documents into LyX on a Fedora
Core 5 box. I found several packages, but didn't manage to install it in
an easy and quick way.
I know Fedora and I
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 10:56, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Please add it to bugzilla, if not already done.
Would that change the file format?
Jürgen
PS: Wearing my hat of file format police. ;-)
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:28, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Please add it to bugzilla, if not already done.
Would that change the file format?
Yes.
I was afraid to hear that. You know the rules, this change can only go in
1.5svn. :-(
Jürgen
PS: Wearing my hat
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:02, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
exactly. People are quite excited ATM (though I'm not living in one of
the FIFA occupied cities). But do I have to tell that to a Portuguese?
For us, two years ago - Euro 2004, it was UEFA. :-)
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Monday 19 June 2006 12:02, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm asking on behalf of one of my users.
>
> I need to include the APA regulations for documents into LyX on a Fedora
> Core 5 box. I found several packages, but didn't manage to install it in
> an easy and quick way.
I know Fedora
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 10:56, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Please add it to bugzilla, if not already done.
Would that change the file format?
> Jürgen
PS: Wearing my hat of file format police. ;-)
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:28, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> >> Please add it to bugzilla, if not already done.
> >
> > Would that change the file format?
>
> Yes.
I was afraid to hear that. You know the rules, this change can only go in
1.5sv
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:02, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> exactly. People are quite excited ATM (though I'm not living in one of
> the "FIFA occupied cities"). But do I have to tell that to a Portuguese?
For us, two years ago - Euro 2004, it was UEFA. :-)
> Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:15, Stefano Grioni wrote:
Do you know which package does the math-preview? Because on arch they
aren't packaged so I'd like to package on my own the right one .
A subpackage of auctex:
http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/
Thx
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:15, Stefano Grioni wrote:
Do you know which package does the math-preview? Because on arch they
aren't packaged so I'd like to package on my own the right one .
A subpackage of auctex:
http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/
Thx
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:15, Stefano Grioni wrote:
> Do you know which package does the math-preview? Because on arch they
> aren't packaged so I'd like to package on my own the right one .
A subpackage of auctex:
http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/
> Thx
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 15 June 2006 18:31, José Marco de la Rosa wrote:
Hi everybody, I just write because I can't make it to write functions
which are not in the math function panel to my equations. I try with
\function_name within the math mode but it fails to generate the dvi
¿anyone can help me?
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 15 June 2006 18:31, José Marco de la Rosa wrote:
Hi everybody, I just write because I can't make it to write functions
which are not in the math function panel to my equations. I try with
\function_name within the math mode but it fails to generate the dvi
¿anyone can help me?
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 15 June 2006 18:31, José Marco de la Rosa wrote:
> Hi everybody, I just write because I can't make it to write functions
> which are not in the math function panel to my equations. I try with
> \function_name within the math mode but it fails to generate the dvi
> ¿anyone can help
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
was given the number 1, not number 6.
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:47, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Matej,
Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up
a much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:12, Steve Litt wrote:
Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
Yes.
Since I am lazy I always go first to http://lyx.org and from there to
Herbert's site. :-)
SteveT
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 00:37, Paul Elliott wrote:
Does anyone have any examples of using lyx with sgmltools
to create man pages and/or info pages?
I should be honest, that was always on my list of things to do but I never
got there. :-) (If you mean docbook, read below).
Are there any
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
was given the number 1, not number 6.
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:47, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Matej,
Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up
a much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:12, Steve Litt wrote:
Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
Yes.
Since I am lazy I always go first to http://lyx.org and from there to
Herbert's site. :-)
SteveT
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 00:37, Paul Elliott wrote:
Does anyone have any examples of using lyx with sgmltools
to create man pages and/or info pages?
I should be honest, that was always on my list of things to do but I never
got there. :-) (If you mean docbook, read below).
Are there any
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
> originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
> between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
> was given the number 1, not number
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:47, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi Matej,
>
> Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up
> a much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
>
> I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's "Guide to LaTeX", because I
> read
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:12, Steve Litt wrote:
> Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
Yes.
Since I am lazy I always go first to http://lyx.org and from there to
Herbert's site. :-)
> SteveT
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 00:37, Paul Elliott wrote:
> Does anyone have any examples of using lyx with sgmltools
> to create man pages and/or info pages?
I should be honest, that was always on my list of things to do but I never
got there. :-) (If you mean docbook, read below).
> Are there
On Saturday 10 June 2006 00:34, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Is Instant Preview working at all in LyX 1.4.1?
Yes.
I upgraded from 1.3.7 to 1.4.1 on my Fedora 5 box and mathematical
expression are not rendered with Instant Preview. Then, I removed 1.4.1
and installed 1.3.7 back and it worked
On Saturday 10 June 2006 00:34, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Is Instant Preview working at all in LyX 1.4.1?
Yes.
I upgraded from 1.3.7 to 1.4.1 on my Fedora 5 box and mathematical
expression are not rendered with Instant Preview. Then, I removed 1.4.1
and installed 1.3.7 back and it worked
On Saturday 10 June 2006 00:34, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Is Instant Preview working at all in LyX 1.4.1?
Yes.
> I upgraded from 1.3.7 to 1.4.1 on my Fedora 5 box and mathematical
> expression are not rendered with Instant Preview. Then, I removed 1.4.1
> and installed 1.3.7 back and it worked
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:04, Stephen Harris wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Things have improved a lot meanwhile. It is on my plans to have a ready
to go system for fedora as, I am sure, there are for other linux
distributions.
You know best! Is there an objective method used
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:29, David Neeley wrote:
There are a number of package/installation systems in Linux--perhaps
as we get true Linux Standard Base-compliant we can settle those down
a great deal! I have also heard good things about yum (making up for
some of the rpm deficiencies);
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:04, Stephen Harris wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Things have improved a lot meanwhile. It is on my plans to have a ready
to go system for fedora as, I am sure, there are for other linux
distributions.
You know best! Is there an objective method used
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:29, David Neeley wrote:
There are a number of package/installation systems in Linux--perhaps
as we get true Linux Standard Base-compliant we can settle those down
a great deal! I have also heard good things about yum (making up for
some of the rpm deficiencies);
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:04, Stephen Harris wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> >
> > Things have improved a lot meanwhile. It is on my plans to have a ready
> > to go system for fedora as, I am sure, there are for other linux
> > distributions.
>
> You know best!
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:29, David Neeley wrote:
> There are a number of package/installation systems in Linux--perhaps
> as we get true Linux Standard Base-compliant we can settle those down
> a great deal! I have also heard good things about yum (making up for
> some of the rpm
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
a bit involved to get all the packages working together IMO.
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
a bit involved to get all the packages working together IMO.
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
> SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
> has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
> Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
> a bit involved to get all the packages working together IMO.
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 16:16, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it
happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-)
Did I wrote that?! :-)
I had very few time to answer and this is result. :-)
Well, it didn't
1 - 100 of 771 matches
Mail list logo
