Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-01-06, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
Although based on Description, enumitem's Labeling/LyX-List should
not change the original layout. It seems I forgot to reset the label font.
Please apply the following patch:
Guenter, this is meant
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2011-01-06, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> Although based on "Description", enumitem's "Labeling/LyX-List" should
> >> not change the original layout. It seems I forgot to reset the label font.
>
>
Guenter Milde wrote:
Although based on Description, enumitem's Labeling/LyX-List should
not change the original layout. It seems I forgot to reset the label font.
Please apply the following patch:
Guenter, this is meant to be applied to trunk? pavel
---
Guenter Milde wrote:
Although based on Description, enumitem's Labeling/LyX-List should
not change the original layout. It seems I forgot to reset the label font.
Please apply the following patch:
Guenter, this is meant to be applied to trunk? pavel
---
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Although based on "Description", enumitem's "Labeling/LyX-List" should
> not change the original layout. It seems I forgot to reset the label font.
>
> Please apply the following patch:
Guenter, this is meant to be applied to trunk? pavel
> ---
Dear past, current and possible future LyX translators,
our development tree is slowly moving towards the first stable release of LyX
2.0.
Except bugfixing we are not adding new features or changing the code
substantially,
so the database of translation strings shouldn't change considerably and
Dear past, current and possible future LyX translators,
our development tree is slowly moving towards the first stable release of LyX
2.0.
Except bugfixing we are not adding new features or changing the code
substantially,
so the database of translation strings shouldn't change considerably and
Dear past, current and possible future LyX translators,
our development tree is slowly moving towards the first stable release of LyX
2.0.
Except bugfixing we are not adding new features or changing the code
substantially,
so the database of translation strings shouldn't change considerably and
Liviu Andronic wrote:
\today and the PDF output works correctly with german weekday names. But
as far as I understand it Insert - Date is a plain LyX UI thing.
Maybe I'm missing something?
Perhaps Document Settings Language German?
i think its not currently possible. strftime which
Liviu Andronic wrote:
\today and the PDF output works correctly with german weekday names. But
as far as I understand it Insert - Date is a plain LyX UI thing.
Maybe I'm missing something?
Perhaps Document Settings Language German?
i think its not currently possible. strftime which
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > \today and the PDF output works correctly with german weekday names. But
> > as far as I understand it "Insert - Date" is a plain LyX UI thing.
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something?
> >
> Perhaps Document > Settings > Language > German?
i think its not currently possible.
john.beattie wrote:
PR Tools Preferences Look and Feel Display, the drop-down list next
to Instant Preview is grayed out?
As in the attached jpg.
I changed the preferences file and got the state shown in the second jpg.
only now i understand what you mean. its a small bug in ui,
john.beattie wrote:
PR Tools Preferences Look and Feel Display, the drop-down list next
to Instant Preview is grayed out?
As in the attached jpg.
I changed the preferences file and got the state shown in the second jpg.
only now i understand what you mean. its a small bug in ui,
john.beattie wrote:
>
> PR>> Tools > Preferences > Look and Feel > Display, the drop-down list next
> to "Instant Preview" is grayed out?
>
> As in the attached jpg.
>
>
> I changed the preferences file and got the state shown in the second jpg.
only now i understand what you mean. its a
Steve Litt wrote:
Anyone know how to change the linelengths of the exported text file?
tools-prefs-plain text
pavel
Steve Litt wrote:
Anyone know how to change the linelengths of the exported text file?
tools-prefs-plain text
pavel
Steve Litt wrote:
> Anyone know how to change the linelengths of the exported text file?
tools->prefs->plain text
pavel
Jose Quesada wrote:
yes, but not the latex3 packages:
(in any case, I fixed it with texhash, thanks to Liviu and the list)
and do you have set latex USE flag when emerging lyx? texhash is done
automatically for you then...
pavel
Michael Joyner wrote:
Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
did you export with _native_ 1.6 format? if you slip 1.4 .lyx file to
lyx 1.6, he needs to run pythonic beast to convert firstly into 1.6
format and then do the
Michael Joyner wrote:
Old LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 53 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
New LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 78 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
If I export to pdflatex, then run pdflatex, these are the associated
pdflatex timings:
Old pdflatex: ~ 13 seconds,
Michael Joyner wrote:
I did a save as new file name, is that sufficient?
if you did it in 1.6 then yes.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
Old LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 53 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
New LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 78 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
If I export to pdflatex, then run pdflatex, these are the associated
pdflatex timings
Michael Joyner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
did you export with _native_ 1.6 format? if you slip 1.4 .lyx
Michael Joyner wrote:
Incorrect.
i know ;) see my other mail..p
Here are the export timings (3 each in a row) to create the *.tex files:
Old LyX, -e pdflatex: 29.56, 29.60, 30.21
New LyX, -e pdflatex: 61.22, 62.56, 59.28
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
did you export with _native_ 1.6
Payal wrote:
I want my original layouts and settings back. What should I do now?
first of all try tools-reconfigure in 1.6.
pavel
Michael Joyner wrote:
one workaround - use --batch-mode which should avoid gui inits.
lyx does not recognize --batch-mode as a command line operator:
thats partly my fault since i didnt checked and only tried to give directions...
the switch is -batch and is part of lyx 2.0.
via some
Jose Quesada wrote:
yes, but not the latex3 packages:
(in any case, I fixed it with texhash, thanks to Liviu and the list)
and do you have set latex USE flag when emerging lyx? texhash is done
automatically for you then...
pavel
Michael Joyner wrote:
Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
did you export with _native_ 1.6 format? if you slip 1.4 .lyx file to
lyx 1.6, he needs to run pythonic beast to convert firstly into 1.6
format and then do the
Michael Joyner wrote:
Old LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 53 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
New LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 78 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
If I export to pdflatex, then run pdflatex, these are the associated
pdflatex timings:
Old pdflatex: ~ 13 seconds,
Michael Joyner wrote:
I did a save as new file name, is that sufficient?
if you did it in 1.6 then yes.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
Old LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 53 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
New LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 78 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
If I export to pdflatex, then run pdflatex, these are the associated
pdflatex timings
Michael Joyner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
did you export with _native_ 1.6 format? if you slip 1.4 .lyx
Michael Joyner wrote:
Incorrect.
i know ;) see my other mail..p
Here are the export timings (3 each in a row) to create the *.tex files:
Old LyX, -e pdflatex: 29.56, 29.60, 30.21
New LyX, -e pdflatex: 61.22, 62.56, 59.28
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Michael Joyner wrote:
Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
did you export with _native_ 1.6
Payal wrote:
I want my original layouts and settings back. What should I do now?
first of all try tools-reconfigure in 1.6.
pavel
Michael Joyner wrote:
one workaround - use --batch-mode which should avoid gui inits.
lyx does not recognize --batch-mode as a command line operator:
thats partly my fault since i didnt checked and only tried to give directions...
the switch is -batch and is part of lyx 2.0.
via some
Jose Quesada wrote:
> yes, but not the latex3 packages:
> (in any case, I fixed it with texhash, thanks to Liviu and the list)
and do you have set latex USE flag when emerging lyx? texhash is done
automatically for you then...
pavel
Michael Joyner wrote:
> Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
> stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
did you export with _native_ 1.6 format? if you slip 1.4 .lyx file to
lyx 1.6, he needs to run pythonic beast to convert firstly into 1.6
format and then do the
Michael Joyner wrote:
> Old LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 53 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
> New LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 78 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
>
> If I export to pdflatex, then run pdflatex, these are the associated
> pdflatex timings:
>
> Old pdflatex: ~ 13
Michael Joyner wrote:
> I did a "save as" new file name, is that sufficient?
if you did it in 1.6 then yes.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Michael Joyner wrote:
> > Old LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 53 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
> > New LyX, -e pdf2: ~ 78 seconds, multiple runs, timed using /usr/bin/time -p
> >
> > If I export to pdflatex, then run pdflatex, these are
Michael Joyner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote:
>
> > Michael Joyner wrote:
> > > Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
> > > stock LyX build from RedHat/Epel ?
> >
> >
Michael Joyner wrote:
> Incorrect.
i know ;) see my other mail..p
> Here are the export timings (3 each in a row) to create the *.tex files:
>
> Old LyX, -e pdflatex: 29.56, 29.60, 30.21
> New LyX, -e pdflatex: 61.22, 62.56, 59.28
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Michael Joyner wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Michael Joyner wrote:
> > > > Thoughts as to why this is happening? Is there something wrong with the
> > > > stock L
Payal wrote:
> I want my original layouts and settings back. What should I do now?
first of all try tools->reconfigure in 1.6.
pavel
Michael Joyner wrote:
> > one workaround - use --batch-mode which should avoid gui inits.
> >
>
> lyx does not recognize --batch-mode as a command line operator:
thats partly my fault since i didnt checked and only tried to give directions...
the switch is "-batch" and is part of lyx 2.0.
> >
Wolfgang Keller wrote:
I've asked for this already, and I will keep reposting this question...
Could PLEASE someone finally upload either:
someone == joost at lyx.org
(the only one who is mastering this installer).
you can try to contact him.
pavel
Jose Quesada wrote:
Thanks Liviu.
The package is not there. Do you think this is a bug? If so, I'll fill it on
my distro's tracker.
do you have dev-texlive/texlive-latex installed?
pavel
Wolfgang Keller wrote:
I've asked for this already, and I will keep reposting this question...
Could PLEASE someone finally upload either:
someone == joost at lyx.org
(the only one who is mastering this installer).
you can try to contact him.
pavel
Jose Quesada wrote:
Thanks Liviu.
The package is not there. Do you think this is a bug? If so, I'll fill it on
my distro's tracker.
do you have dev-texlive/texlive-latex installed?
pavel
Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> I've asked for this already, and I will keep reposting this question...
>
> Could PLEASE someone finally upload either:
someone == joost at lyx.org
(the only one who is mastering this installer).
you can try to contact him.
pavel
Jose Quesada wrote:
> Thanks Liviu.
> The package is not there. Do you think this is a bug? If so, I'll fill it on
> my distro's tracker.
do you have dev-texlive/texlive-latex installed?
pavel
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)
==
We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Due to the many reports we received, support for polyglossia, XeTeX's new
language interface and babel replacement, has been added. In the
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)
==
We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Due to the many reports we received, support for polyglossia, XeTeX's new
language interface and babel replacement, has been added. In the
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)
==
We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Due to the many reports we received, support for polyglossia, XeTeX's new
language interface and babel replacement, has been added. In the
Jose Quesada wrote:
Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)
there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
more like the
Jose Quesada wrote:
Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)
there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
more like the
Jose Quesada wrote:
> Thanks Pavel,
> So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
> I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)
there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
more like
Jose Quesada wrote:
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
been like that...
yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.
pavel
Jose Quesada wrote:
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
been like that...
yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.
pavel
Jose Quesada wrote:
> /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
> /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
>
> I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
> been like that...
yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.
pavel
Frederick Noronha wrote:
Let me share it with you here, while thanking Stefano for helping me
convert some of my files!
another way how to thank is to create/edit lyx wiki page so others
are able to reach it quickly.
pavel
Frederick Noronha wrote:
Let me share it with you here, while thanking Stefano for helping me
convert some of my files!
another way how to thank is to create/edit lyx wiki page so others
are able to reach it quickly.
pavel
Frederick Noronha wrote:
> Let me share it with you here, while thanking Stefano for helping me
> convert some of my files!
another way how to thank is to create/edit lyx wiki page so others
are able to reach it quickly.
pavel
Kelly Kearney wrote:
interpreted as newline when running csv2lyx.py. For future reference, is
there a
way to force this mode in Lyx when importing csv's,
i dont think this is currently possible.
pavel
Kelly Kearney wrote:
interpreted as newline when running csv2lyx.py. For future reference, is
there a
way to force this mode in Lyx when importing csv's,
i dont think this is currently possible.
pavel
Kelly Kearney wrote:
> interpreted as newline when running csv2lyx.py. For future reference, is
> there a
> way to force this mode in Lyx when importing csv's,
i dont think this is currently possible.
pavel
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is command-sequence, ert-insert, self-insert...
zhao_yunsong wrote:
why?
_how_ did you try?
pavel
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is command-sequence, ert-insert, self-insert...
zhao_yunsong wrote:
why?
_how_ did you try?
pavel
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
> Guenter Milde users.berlios.de> writes:
> > You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert "--- and so on...
>
> Putting
> ert-insert "---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is command-sequence, ert-insert, self-insert...
zhao_yunsong wrote:
> why?
_how_ did you try?
pavel
Bishan Meghani wrote:
That's correct. I would like to know if there is a way of finding out if
there exists a function which does a particular thing. It is quite
time-consuming to go through each menu in the toolbar. For the moment, the
wikisearch hasn't helped me a great deal.
if you mean
Paul Johnson wrote:
I can't seem to understand the last step of using that with LyX.
i dont believe this is possible out of the box with lyx.
Suggestions?
if you are brave then digging into the external template created
for svg could help, but expect few hard hours/nights ;)
pavel
Bishan Meghani wrote:
That's correct. I would like to know if there is a way of finding out if
there exists a function which does a particular thing. It is quite
time-consuming to go through each menu in the toolbar. For the moment, the
wikisearch hasn't helped me a great deal.
if you mean
Paul Johnson wrote:
I can't seem to understand the last step of using that with LyX.
i dont believe this is possible out of the box with lyx.
Suggestions?
if you are brave then digging into the external template created
for svg could help, but expect few hard hours/nights ;)
pavel
Bishan Meghani wrote:
> That's correct. I would like to know if there is a way of finding out if
> there exists a function which does a particular thing. It is quite
> time-consuming to go through each menu in the toolbar. For the moment, the
> wikisearch hasn't helped me a great deal.
if you
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I can't seem to understand the last step of using that with LyX.
i dont believe this is possible out of the box with lyx.
> Suggestions?
if you are brave then digging into the external template created
for svg could help, but expect few hard hours/nights ;)
pavel
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I actually compiled from SVN last night (36437) but it doesn't seem to like
me much. It aborts at startup with a memory allocation exception.
try to compile and build from a completely new tree.
pavel
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I actually compiled from SVN last night (36437) but it doesn't seem to like
me much. It aborts at startup with a memory allocation exception.
try to compile and build from a completely new tree.
pavel
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I actually compiled from SVN last night (36437) but it doesn't seem to like
> me much. It aborts at startup with a memory allocation exception.
try to compile and build from a completely new tree.
pavel
Liviu Andronic wrote:
called so, without much more than a hitch here and there. My personal
experience is that trunk is rock stable (anyone reading this, check
first the entire list of bugs tagged 'milestone 2.0.0'!!),
but for the
compilation process where I regularly get crashes.
care to
Liviu Andronic wrote:
called so, without much more than a hitch here and there. My personal
experience is that trunk is rock stable (anyone reading this, check
first the entire list of bugs tagged 'milestone 2.0.0'!!),
but for the
compilation process where I regularly get crashes.
care to
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> called so, without much more than a hitch here and there. My personal
> experience is that trunk is rock stable (anyone reading this, check
> first the entire list of bugs tagged 'milestone 2.0.0'!!),
>but for the
> compilation process where I regularly get crashes.
care
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In lyx 2.0, the right command line is
lyx -batch -x reconfigure
For whatever reason -batch did not exist in 1.6 (BTW, shouldn't it be
--batch?)
it would trigger avelanche of changes, because then it must be --batch= and so
on.
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In lyx 2.0, the right command line is
lyx -batch -x reconfigure
For whatever reason -batch did not exist in 1.6 (BTW, shouldn't it be
--batch?)
it would trigger avelanche of changes, because then it must be --batch=
and so on.
What would you put after the =
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
ok in this case no, but if you want to be consistent many things should be
changed
then, like all -string switches - --string switches; switches like -dbg
-export
have argument and should have '=' if we want to work in the same vein as
most of
nowadays linux
stefano franchi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:52:59 -0600
stefano == stefano franchi wrote:
Hiya Stefano,
Would you mind to add/document your 'method' to the wiki in order not to
get
lost in the mailing list?
stefano franchi wrote:
I added a very basic page and tweaked the xetex.lyx and xetex.pdf files to
show luatex in use. But I cannot find out how yo upload the files.
Advice appreciated
right top corner, Upload link.
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In lyx 2.0, the right command line is
lyx -batch -x reconfigure
For whatever reason -batch did not exist in 1.6 (BTW, shouldn't it be
--batch?)
it would trigger avelanche of changes, because then it must be --batch= and so
on.
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In lyx 2.0, the right command line is
lyx -batch -x reconfigure
For whatever reason -batch did not exist in 1.6 (BTW, shouldn't it be
--batch?)
it would trigger avelanche of changes, because then it must be --batch=
and so on.
What would you put after the =
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
ok in this case no, but if you want to be consistent many things should be
changed
then, like all -string switches - --string switches; switches like -dbg
-export
have argument and should have '=' if we want to work in the same vein as
most of
nowadays linux
stefano franchi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:52:59 -0600
stefano == stefano franchi wrote:
Hiya Stefano,
Would you mind to add/document your 'method' to the wiki in order not to
get
lost in the mailing list?
stefano franchi wrote:
I added a very basic page and tweaked the xetex.lyx and xetex.pdf files to
show luatex in use. But I cannot find out how yo upload the files.
Advice appreciated
right top corner, Upload link.
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> In lyx 2.0, the right command line is
> lyx -batch -x reconfigure
>
> For whatever reason -batch did not exist in 1.6 (BTW, shouldn't it be
> --batch?)
it would trigger avelanche of changes, because then it must be --batch= and so
on.
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> In lyx 2.0, the right command line is
>>> lyx -batch -x reconfigure
>>>
>>> For whatever reason -batch did not exist in 1.6 (BTW, shouldn't it be
>>> --batch?)
>>
>> it would trigger avelanche of changes, because then it must be --batch=
>> and so on.
>
> What
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> ok in this case no, but if you want to be consistent many things should be
>> changed
>> then, like all -string switches -> --string switches; switches like -dbg
>> -export
>> have argument and should have '=' if we want to work in the same vein as
>> most of
>>
stefano franchi wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Gour wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:52:59 -0600
> > >> "stefano" == stefano franchi wrote:
> >
> > Hiya Stefano,
> >
> > Would you mind to add/document your 'method' to the wiki in order not to
> > get
> >
901 - 1000 of 2660 matches
Mail list logo