Re: Re: [Q] RevTex + nonstandard bibliography??

2002-02-06 Thread Atul Narang
Guenter, I changed the aps.sty file. It made no difference - RevTeX retains its default style. Atul --- Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:13:44 -0800 (PST) wrote Atul > Narang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Herbert, > > > If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the >

Re: [Q] RevTex + nonstandard bibliography??

2002-02-06 Thread Atul Narang
Herbert, RevTex is the LaTeX flavor developed by the physics community. It does support a bibliography; by default, the bibliography corresponds to the style for physics journals like Physical Review A, Physical Review B (prb), etc. None of these correspond to what I am looking for. Since RevTex

Re: [Q] RevTex + nonstandard bibliography??

2002-02-05 Thread Atul Narang
Herbert, If I use \bibliographystyle{plain} in the preamble, I get a series of errors. If I say plain in the box "BibTex Generated References", nothing happens - the default RevTex format persists. Atul RevTeX --- Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Atul Narang wrote: > > > Is it possib

Re: [Q] RevTex + nonstandard bibliography??

2002-02-05 Thread Herbert Voss
Atul Narang wrote: > Is it possible to use RevTex with a "nonstandard" .bst > file? > > I am using RevTex (it has some nice features), but I > would like the bibliography to appear like it does in > Journal of Theoretical Biology, > ie., > > 1. The references should appear in the format (Jones,

[Q] RevTex + nonstandard bibliography??

2002-02-05 Thread Atul Narang
Is it possible to use RevTex with a "nonstandard" .bst file? I am using RevTex (it has some nice features), but I would like the bibliography to appear like it does in Journal of Theoretical Biology, ie., 1. The references should appear in the format (Jones, 1990; Jones and Smith, 1991) 2. The