Stephen Harris schrieb:
Uwe's installer requires searching the Windows registry in
a way that is avoided by the Angus installer. Uwe likes this.
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
Paul Smith wrote:
On 4/24/06, Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
There is no uninstaller for the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is not needed?
Georg
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Stephen Harris schrieb:
Next, the Win1.4.x installer is still beta and there is a list
of potential problems at http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX14x
so it is prudent/competent to install the LyX1.3.7 version.
It's not beta! LyXWIninstaller is now very stable: I have
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is not needed?
Yes
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is
Stephen Harris schrieb:
Uwe's installer requires searching the Windows registry in
a way that is avoided by the Angus installer. Uwe likes this.
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
Paul Smith wrote:
On 4/24/06, Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
There is no uninstaller for the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is not needed?
Georg
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Stephen Harris schrieb:
Next, the Win1.4.x installer is still beta and there is a list
of potential problems at http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX14x
so it is prudent/competent to install the LyX1.3.7 version.
It's not beta! LyXWIninstaller is now very stable: I have
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is not needed?
Yes
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is
Stephen Harris schrieb:
Uwe's installer requires searching the Windows registry in
a way that is avoided by the Angus installer. Uwe likes this.
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
Paul Smith wrote:
On 4/24/06, Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
There is no uninstaller for the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
> to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is not needed?
Georg
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Stephen Harris schrieb:
Next, the Win1.4.x installer is still beta and there is a list
of potential problems at http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX14x
so it is prudent/competent to install the LyX1.3.7 version.
It's not beta! LyXWIninstaller is now very stable: I have
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is not needed?
Yes
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
No, you don't need admin privileges to _read_ registry entries, we need
to _write_ some, for example the global PATH variable for Imagemagick.
??? I thought that the path_prefix rc value was invented to overcome this
problem, so setting a global PATH is
Hello LyXers,
under
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=9869
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
To learn more about the LyX installer for Windows, have a look at
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller
You can install LyX 1.4.1
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make your installer
the official one. If the inclusion
On 4/24/06, Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make
Bo Peng wrote:
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make your installer
the official one.
Paul Smith wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
regards Uwe
Hi, all,
Both the 1.4.x installer versions have flaws and it is to be expected
that the newer release (Uwe) would incorporate more fixes.
The Angus installer
is not going to reflect bug improvements without an active
maintainer and Uwe has stated he doesn't have time to maintain
both
On 4/24/06, Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
There is no uninstaller for the LyX 1.3.7 official
Bo Peng wrote:
Hi, all,
Both the 1.4.x installer versions have flaws and it is to be expected
that the newer release (Uwe) would incorporate more fixes.
The Angus installer
is not going to reflect bug improvements without an active
maintainer and Uwe has stated he doesn't have time to
Hello LyXers,
under
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=9869
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
To learn more about the LyX installer for Windows, have a look at
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller
You can install LyX 1.4.1
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make your installer
the official one. If the inclusion
On 4/24/06, Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make
Bo Peng wrote:
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make your installer
the official one.
Paul Smith wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
regards Uwe
Hi, all,
Both the 1.4.x installer versions have flaws and it is to be expected
that the newer release (Uwe) would incorporate more fixes.
The Angus installer
is not going to reflect bug improvements without an active
maintainer and Uwe has stated he doesn't have time to maintain
both
On 4/24/06, Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
There is no uninstaller for the LyX 1.3.7 official
Bo Peng wrote:
Hi, all,
Both the 1.4.x installer versions have flaws and it is to be expected
that the newer release (Uwe) would incorporate more fixes.
The Angus installer
is not going to reflect bug improvements without an active
maintainer and Uwe has stated he doesn't have time to
Hello LyXers,
under
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=9869
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
To learn more about the LyX installer for Windows, have a look at
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller
You can install LyX 1.4.1 aditionally
> you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make your installer
the official one. If the
On 4/24/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
>
> This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
> installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
> celebrated!
>
> Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented
Bo Peng wrote:
you can find the windows installer for LyX 1.4.1.
This comes a week later after all my troubles with the official
installer (see my another email), still this installer should be
celebrated!
Uwe, I have asked before what has prevented us to make your installer
the official one.
Paul Smith wrote:
I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
LyX, in case one is previously installed.
Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
uninstaller.
regards Uwe
Hi, all,
> Both the 1.4.x installer versions have flaws and it is to be expected
> that the newer release (Uwe) would incorporate more fixes.
> The Angus installer
> is not going to reflect bug improvements without an active
> maintainer and Uwe has stated he doesn't have time to maintain
> both
On 4/24/06, Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would suggest another enhancement: the ability to remove the older
> > LyX, in case one is previously installed.
>
> Why that? You can remove the old installed LyX version easily by its
> uninstaller.
There is no uninstaller for the LyX 1.3.7
Bo Peng wrote:
Hi, all,
Both the 1.4.x installer versions have flaws and it is to be expected
that the newer release (Uwe) would incorporate more fixes.
The Angus installer
is not going to reflect bug improvements without an active
maintainer and Uwe has stated he doesn't have time to
45 matches
Mail list logo
