Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s.
I got the patch and unzipped it into my Lyx directory. /usr/share/lyx
(using the unzip karchiveur from KDE.)
Next I marked
Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the
rpm`s.
I got the patch and unzipped it into my Lyx directory. /usr/share/lyx
(using the unzip karchiveur from KDE.)
Next I marked
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Thorsten Grothe wrote:
Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s.
Are you sure?
I use Suse 6.2 (kernel 2.2.10) and rpm's work fine. I installed
"Thorsten" == Thorsten Grothe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thorsten Hey everybody, I`m a pretty new linux user working with
Thorsten lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m
Thorsten using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s. I got the
Thorsten patch an
Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s.
I got the patch and unzipped it into my Lyx directory. /usr/share/lyx
(using the unzip karchiveur from KDE.)
Next I marked
Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the
rpm`s.
I got the patch and unzipped it into my Lyx directory. /usr/share/lyx
(using the unzip karchiveur from KDE.)
Next I marked
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Thorsten Grothe wrote:
Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s.
Are you sure?
I use Suse 6.2 (kernel 2.2.10) and rpm's work fine. I installed
"Thorsten" == Thorsten Grothe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thorsten Hey everybody, I`m a pretty new linux user working with
Thorsten lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m
Thorsten using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s. I got the
Thorsten patch an
Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s.
I got the patch and unzipped it into my Lyx directory. /usr/share/lyx
(using the unzip karchiveur from KDE.)
Next I marked
Hey everybody,
I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the
rpm`s.
I got the patch and unzipped it into my Lyx directory. /usr/share/lyx
(using the unzip karchiveur from KDE.)
Next I marked
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Thorsten Grothe wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I`m a pretty new linux user working with lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch
> it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot take the rpm`s.
Are you sure?
I use Suse 6.2 (kernel 2.2.10) and rpm's
>>>>> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Grothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thorsten> Hey everybody, I`m a pretty new linux user working with
Thorsten> lyx-1.1.4fix1. I tried to patch it with patch-1.1.4fix2. I´m
Thorsten> using Suse Linux 6.4 so I cannot t
Is there a different 1.1.4 fix2 rpm other than the ".rpm.RH51.rpm"
found at Kayvan's site? Or should I use the RH5.1 fix
Thank You.
Shawn Koons
--
"Why do we do what we do,
why do we believe what we believe, and
why do our practices seem to fall so short of
what is possible for us?" -- Vine
"Shawn" == Shawn Koons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shawn Is there a different 1.1.4 fix2 rpm other than the
Shawn ".rpm.RH51.rpm" found at Kayvan's site? Or should I use the
Shawn RH5.1 fix
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
JMarc
Sorry, I thought I had to install fixes in the order of their numbers.
Thanks for the quick response.
Shawn Koons
--
"Why do we do what we do,
why do we believe what we believe, and
why do our practices seem to fall so short
"Shawn" == Shawn Koons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shawn Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
Shawn Sorry, I thought I had to install fixes in the order of their
Shawn numbers.
This is only true when you compile your self. The rpms are
self-contained.
JMarc
Is there a different 1.1.4 fix2 rpm other than the ".rpm.RH51.rpm"
found at Kayvan's site? Or should I use the RH5.1 fix
Thank You.
Shawn Koons
--
"Why do we do what we do,
why do we believe what we believe, and
why do our practices seem to fall so short of
what is possible for us?" -- Vine
"Shawn" == Shawn Koons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shawn Is there a different 1.1.4 fix2 rpm other than the
Shawn ".rpm.RH51.rpm" found at Kayvan's site? Or should I use the
Shawn RH5.1 fix
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
JMarc
Sorry, I thought I had to install fixes in the order of their numbers.
Thanks for the quick response.
Shawn Koons
--
"Why do we do what we do,
why do we believe what we believe, and
why do our practices seem to fall so short
"Shawn" == Shawn Koons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shawn Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
Shawn Sorry, I thought I had to install fixes in the order of their
Shawn numbers.
This is only true when you compile your self. The rpms are
self-contained.
JMarc
Is there a different 1.1.4 fix2 rpm other than the ".rpm.RH51.rpm"
found at Kayvan's site? Or should I use the RH5.1 fix
Thank You.
Shawn Koons
--
"Why do we do what we do,
why do we believe what we believe, and
why do our practices seem to fall so short of
what is
> "Shawn" == Shawn Koons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shawn> Is there a different 1.1.4 fix2 rpm other than the
Shawn> ".rpm.RH51.rpm" found at Kayvan's site? Or should I use the
Shawn> RH5.1 fix
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
JMarc
Sorry, I thought I had to install fixes in the order of their numbers.
Thanks for the quick response.
Shawn Koons
--
"Why do we do what we do,
why do we believe what we believe, and
why do our practices seem to
> "Shawn" == Shawn Koons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shawn> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What don't you take the fix3 rpm?
Shawn> Sorry, I thought I had to install fixes in the order of their
Shawn> numbers.
This is only true when you compile your self. The rpms are
self-contained.
ove useful to the developers. (This was
Ronald Lyx-1.1.4fix2, Sparc-solaris-2.6, gcc-2.8.1, xforms-0.88):
I'll release today or tommorrow a fix3 that will _hopefully_ fix this
problem. We'll see.
Ronald Regards, and good luck to the developers. The LyX activity
Ronald that seems to correlate with t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Ronald Regards, and good luck to the developers. The LyX activity
Ronald that seems to correlate with the mystery crashes is repeated
Ronald keystrokes, such as multiple deletes.
Do these keystrokes include use of backspace?
I believe so.
ove useful to the developers. (This was
Ronald Lyx-1.1.4fix2, Sparc-solaris-2.6, gcc-2.8.1, xforms-0.88):
I'll release today or tommorrow a fix3 that will _hopefully_ fix this
problem. We'll see.
Ronald Regards, and good luck to the developers. The LyX activity
Ronald that seems to correlate with t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Ronald Regards, and good luck to the developers. The LyX activity
Ronald that seems to correlate with the mystery crashes is repeated
Ronald keystrokes, such as multiple deletes.
Do these keystrokes include use of backspace?
I believe so.
w, in
Ronald> the hope that it may prove useful to the developers. (This was
Ronald> Lyx-1.1.4fix2, Sparc-solaris-2.6, gcc-2.8.1, xforms-0.88):
I'll release today or tommorrow a fix3 that will _hopefully_ fix this
problem. We'll see.
Ronald> Regards, and good luck to the developers.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Ronald> Regards, and good luck to the developers. The LyX activity
Ronald> that seems to correlate with the mystery crashes is repeated
Ronald> keystrokes, such as multiple deletes.
Do these keystrokes include use of backspace?
I believe so.
Is a fix for the Lyx-1.1.4 mystery crashes, which several posters to
this group have reported, in the works? I've included a gdb stack
trace of one of these crashes below, in the hope that it may prove
useful to the developers. (This was Lyx-1.1.4fix2, Sparc-solaris-2.6,
gcc-2.8.1, xforms-0.88
Is a fix for the Lyx-1.1.4 mystery crashes, which several posters to
this group have reported, in the works? I've included a gdb stack
trace of one of these crashes below, in the hope that it may prove
useful to the developers. (This was Lyx-1.1.4fix2, Sparc-solaris-2.6,
gcc-2.8.1, xforms-0.88
Is a fix for the Lyx-1.1.4 mystery crashes, which several posters to
this group have reported, in the works? I've included a gdb stack
trace of one of these crashes below, in the hope that it may prove
useful to the developers. (This was Lyx-1.1.4fix2, Sparc-solaris-2.6,
gcc-2.8.1, xforms-0.88
Others have noted this in previous postings, as have I, but
lyx-1.1.4fix2 is unstable -- it crashes without warning. It has
happened to me several times in the last few days. The last time was
after typed ctrl-d three times in a row. I've seen crashes with other
repeated keystroke combinations
Others have noted this in previous postings, as have I, but
lyx-1.1.4fix2 is unstable -- it crashes without warning. It has
happened to me several times in the last few days. The last time was
after typed ctrl-d three times in a row. I've seen crashes with other
repeated keystroke combinations
Others have noted this in previous postings, as have I, but
lyx-1.1.4fix2 is unstable -- it crashes without warning. It has
happened to me several times in the last few days. The last time was
after typed ctrl-d three times in a row. I've seen crashes with other
repeated keystroke combinations
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 12:55:08PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
This concerns Lyx-1.1.4 on a RedHat 6.1 system
I installed Lyx-1.1.4 and applied patch-1.1.4fix1.
So far so good. Everything seems to be working.
When I try to apply patch-1.1.4fix2 I get the following
output. As a non
-1.1.4fix2 I get the following
output. As a non programmer I don't know what to make of
these `Hunk's'. Can anybody please explain (also how to
proceed if these `failures' are critical)
patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
doing that, then you should not be seeing
patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
doing that, then you should not be seeing those messages.
If you mean:
1) install 1.1.4
2) apply patch 1 to 1.1.4
3) apply patch 2 to the result of 1.1.4 + patch1
this is exactly what I did (or tried to do
On 16-Mar-00 Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
doing that, then you should not be seeing those messages
I think I get it now:
A)
1) configure/make/make install Lyx-1.1.4
2) make distclean then apply patch1 and then immediately
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 12:55:08PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
This concerns Lyx-1.1.4 on a RedHat 6.1 system
I installed Lyx-1.1.4 and applied patch-1.1.4fix1.
So far so good. Everything seems to be working.
When I try to apply patch-1.1.4fix2 I get the following
output. As a non
-1.1.4fix2 I get the following
output. As a non programmer I don't know what to make of
these `Hunk's'. Can anybody please explain (also how to
proceed if these `failures' are critical)
patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
doing that, then you should not be seeing
patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
doing that, then you should not be seeing those messages.
If you mean:
1) install 1.1.4
2) apply patch 1 to 1.1.4
3) apply patch 2 to the result of 1.1.4 + patch1
this is exactly what I did (or tried to do
On 16-Mar-00 Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
doing that, then you should not be seeing those messages
I think I get it now:
A)
1) configure/make/make install Lyx-1.1.4
2) make distclean then apply patch1 and then immediately
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 12:55:08PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> This concerns Lyx-1.1.4 on a RedHat 6.1 system
>
> I installed Lyx-1.1.4 and applied patch-1.1.4fix1.
> So far so good. Everything seems to be working.
>
> When I try to apply patch-1.1.4fix2 I get the
; When I try to apply patch-1.1.4fix2 I get the following
>> output. As a non programmer I don't know what to make of
>> these `Hunk's'. Can anybody please explain (also how to
>> proceed if these `failures' are critical)
> patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of pat
> > patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
> > doing that, then you should not be seeing those messages.
>
> If you mean:
> 1) install 1.1.4
> 2) apply patch 1 to 1.1.4
> 3) apply patch 2 to the result of 1.1.4 + patch1
> this i
On 16-Mar-00 Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> patch-1.1.4fix2 should be applied on top of patch-1.1.4fix1. If you are
> doing that, then you should not be seeing those messages
I think I get it now:
A)
1) configure/make/make install Lyx-1.1.4
2) make distclean then apply patch1 and then immed
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:41:39AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
You need to either recompile lyx using
./configure --with-debug
or get Kayvan's lyxgdb rpm.
In fact, I just made a lyxgdb RPM for lyx-1.1.4-fix2
It contains a ``lyxgdb'' binary which is lyx-1.1.4-fix2 binary
with all the
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:41:39AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
You need to either recompile lyx using
./configure --with-debug
or get Kayvan's lyxgdb rpm.
In fact, I just made a lyxgdb RPM for lyx-1.1.4-fix2
It contains a ``lyxgdb'' binary which is lyx-1.1.4-fix2 binary
with all the
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:41:39AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> You need to either recompile lyx using
> ./configure --with-debug
>
> or get Kayvan's lyxgdb rpm.
In fact, I just made a lyxgdb RPM for lyx-1.1.4-fix2
It contains a ``lyxgdb'' binary which is lyx-1.1.4-fix2 binary
with all
51 matches
Mail list logo
