On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
In terms of scaling, if you want to keep the aspect ratio, about all I can
suggest is that you set the width (rather than the height) to the width of
the column (or maybe a smidgen less).
Paul,
Ta-da! Experimentation to the rescue. I took off the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
In terms of scaling, if you want to keep the aspect ratio, about all I
can
suggest is that you set the width (rather than the height) to the
width of
the column (or maybe a smidgen less).
Paul,
Ta-da! Experimentation to the
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
In terms of scaling, if you want to keep the aspect ratio, about all I can
suggest is that you set the width (rather than the height) to the width of
the column (or maybe a smidgen less).
Paul,
Ta-da! Experimentation to the rescue. I took off the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
In terms of scaling, if you want to keep the aspect ratio, about all I
can
suggest is that you set the width (rather than the height) to the
width of
the column (or maybe a smidgen less).
Paul,
Ta-da! Experimentation to the
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
In terms of scaling, if you want to keep the aspect ratio, about all I can
suggest is that you set the width (rather than the height) to the width of
the column (or maybe a smidgen less).
Paul,
Ta-da! Experimentation to the rescue. I took off the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
In terms of scaling, if you want to keep the aspect ratio, about all I
can
suggest is that you set the width (rather than the height) to the
width of
the column (or maybe a smidgen less).
Paul,
Ta-da! Experimentation to the
