Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:03:18 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
RAM.
And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
JMarc
No - I do not have compiz
Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:03:18 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
RAM.
And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
JMarc
No - I do not have compiz
> Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:03:18 +0100
> schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
> > > RAM.
> >
> > And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
> >
> > JMarc
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This time I have already invested in a AGP graphics card
for my system and it paid off. The lag is gone and I can use LyX 1.6
very smoothly again.
FYI, I purchased a geforce 6200 card PNY VERTO GF 6200 AGP 256MB retail
(G606200A8D24LPB).
What
Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:51:44 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This time I have already invested in a AGP graphics card
for my system and it paid off. The lag is gone and I can use LyX 1.6
very smoothly again.
FYI, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
RAM.
And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
JMarc
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found another behaviour that might be relevant for experts to
solve this:
* Large window size of lyx (e.g., full screen or maximized)
- LyX is slow
* Make the window minimal (only show a few lines and columns) - LyX
is
fast
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, I purchased a geforce 6200 card PNY VERTO GF 6200 AGP 256MB retail
(G606200A8D24LPB).
These less expensive GeForce cards are great, especially if you use the
proprietary driver.
rh
Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:03:18 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
RAM.
And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
JMarc
No - I do not have compiz installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is a specific setting to check, please let me know where to
look for.
Well, now that you have your brand new card, I guess there is not much
we can diagose anymore. We'll wait until there is another victim...
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This time I have already invested in a AGP graphics card
for my system and it paid off. The lag is gone and I can use LyX 1.6
very smoothly again.
FYI, I purchased a geforce 6200 card PNY VERTO GF 6200 AGP 256MB retail
(G606200A8D24LPB).
What
Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:51:44 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This time I have already invested in a AGP graphics card
for my system and it paid off. The lag is gone and I can use LyX 1.6
very smoothly again.
FYI, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
RAM.
And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
JMarc
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found another behaviour that might be relevant for experts to
solve this:
* Large window size of lyx (e.g., full screen or maximized)
- LyX is slow
* Make the window minimal (only show a few lines and columns) - LyX
is
fast
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, I purchased a geforce 6200 card PNY VERTO GF 6200 AGP 256MB retail
(G606200A8D24LPB).
These less expensive GeForce cards are great, especially if you use the
proprietary driver.
rh
Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:03:18 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
RAM.
And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
JMarc
No - I do not have compiz installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is a specific setting to check, please let me know where to
look for.
Well, now that you have your brand new card, I guess there is not much
we can diagose anymore. We'll wait until there is another victim...
JMarc
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This time I have already invested in a AGP graphics card
> for my system and it paid off. The lag is gone and I can use LyX 1.6
> very smoothly again.
>
> FYI, I purchased a geforce 6200 card PNY VERTO GF 6200 AGP 256MB retail
>
Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:51:44 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This time I have already invested in a AGP graphics card
> > for my system and it paid off. The lag is gone and I can use LyX 1.6
> > very smoothly again.
>
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
> RAM.
And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
JMarc
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found another behaviour that might be relevant for experts to
solve this:
* Large window size of lyx (e.g., full screen or maximized)
-> LyX is slow
* Make the window minimal (only show a few lines and columns) -> LyX
is
fast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, I purchased a geforce 6200 card PNY VERTO GF 6200 AGP 256MB retail
(G606200A8D24LPB).
These less expensive GeForce cards are great, especially if you use the
proprietary driver.
rh
Am Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:03:18 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Integrated mainboard 865G chipset with Pentium IV 2.8 GHZ and 1024
> > RAM.
>
> And did you enable the 3D desktop effects?
>
> JMarc
No - I do not have
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there is a specific setting to check, please let me know where to
> look for.
Well, now that you have your brand new card, I guess there is not much
we can diagose anymore. We'll wait until there is another victim...
JMarc
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is causing this.
When I type the letters only show up slowly on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still no change. So do I have to face the fact that my computer system
is 4 years old and never was speedy graphic-wise?
No, this is not the problem.
The question remains, what changed in 1.6 in terms of new library
usage that might have caused
Am Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:46:00 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still no change. So do I have to face the fact that my computer
system is 4 years old and never was speedy graphic-wise?
No, this is not the problem.
The
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is causing this.
When I type the letters only show up slowly on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still no change. So do I have to face the fact that my computer system
is 4 years old and never was speedy graphic-wise?
No, this is not the problem.
The question remains, what changed in 1.6 in terms of new library
usage that might have caused
Am Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:46:00 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still no change. So do I have to face the fact that my computer
system is 4 years old and never was speedy graphic-wise?
No, this is not the problem.
The
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
> Something changed recently, however and I do not
> have an idea what is causing this.
>
> When I type the letters only show up slowly
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Still no change. So do I have to face the fact that my computer system
> is 4 years old and never was speedy graphic-wise?
No, this is not the problem.
> The question remains, what changed in 1.6 in terms of new library
> usage that might have
Am Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:46:00 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Still no change. So do I have to face the fact that my computer
> > system is 4 years old and never was speedy graphic-wise?
>
> No, this is not the problem.
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:30:27 -0500
schrieb rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
Yes - with 1.5.6 on the same system
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:20:03 +0100
schrieb Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with
openbox after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a method to check (I have already deleted the compilation
directory)?
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled it myself using libqt4-dev (Version: 4.4.3-0ubuntu1).
The commands I issued:
1. ./autogen.sh
2. ./configure
3. make
4. sudo make install
I am not sure if this stdlib-debug option is set automatically.
I guess this is 1.6.1svn you are using. In this case
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X server. I would be surprised to see
that it is a consequence of using
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:25:09 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with
stdlib-debug?
Note that all the
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast
typing - ...slowly -
I only get the response:
localhost:/applications joachim$ lyx -version
-bash: lyx: command not found
Or
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Joachim Kreimer-de Fries wrote:
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast typing
- ...slowly -
I only get the response:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre and others who know it,
I tried out (with ... --version) all directories that in my opinien
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right
. The which command seems to be
understood by the Mac-OSX terminal as well, but searches only in
certain directories, so it gave as response:
no lyx in /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /usr/local/bin /usr/texbin
Sorry for breaking the thread with this excursion. Go ahead with
Fast typing - LyX follows
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:30:27 -0500
schrieb rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
Yes - with 1.5.6 on the same system
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:20:03 +0100
schrieb Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with
openbox after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a method to check (I have already deleted the compilation
directory)?
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled it myself using libqt4-dev (Version: 4.4.3-0ubuntu1).
The commands I issued:
1. ./autogen.sh
2. ./configure
3. make
4. sudo make install
I am not sure if this stdlib-debug option is set automatically.
I guess this is 1.6.1svn you are using. In this case
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X server. I would be surprised to see
that it is a consequence of using
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:25:09 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with
stdlib-debug?
Note that all the
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast
typing - ...slowly -
I only get the response:
localhost:/applications joachim$ lyx -version
-bash: lyx: command not found
Or
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Joachim Kreimer-de Fries wrote:
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast typing
- ...slowly -
I only get the response:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre and others who know it,
I tried out (with ... --version) all directories that in my opinien
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right
. The which command seems to be
understood by the Mac-OSX terminal as well, but searches only in
certain directories, so it gave as response:
no lyx in /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /usr/local/bin /usr/texbin
Sorry for breaking the thread with this excursion. Go ahead with
Fast typing - LyX follows
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:30:27 -0500
schrieb rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
> > expected on the same system.
> >
> >
> So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
>
> rh
Yes - with 1.5.6 on the
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:20:03 +0100
schrieb Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
> > Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with
> > openbox after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a method to check (I have already deleted the compilation
> directory)?
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled it myself using libqt4-dev (Version: 4.4.3-0ubuntu1).
The commands I issued:
1. ./autogen.sh
2. ./configure
3. make
4. sudo make install
I am not sure if this stdlib-debug option is set automatically.
I guess this is 1.6.1svn you are using. In this case
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
> compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X server. I would be surprised to see
that it is a consequence of using
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:25:09 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
> > compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with
> > stdlib-debug?
>
> Note
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of "fast
typing - ...slowly" -
I only get the response:
localhost:/applications joachim$ lyx -version
-bash: lyx: command not found
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
> > compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
>
> Note that all the load is in
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Joachim Kreimer-de Fries wrote:
>
> Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
>
> Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of "fast typing
> - ...slowly" -
> I only get the
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre and others who know it,
I tried out (with ... --version) all directories that in my opinien
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
>
> > That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
> > binary.
> >
> > If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
>
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the
CTED], too. The "which" command seems to be
understood by the Mac-OSX terminal as well, but searches only in
certain directories, so it gave as response:
no lyx in /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /usr/local/bin /usr/texbin
Sorry for breaking the thread with this excursion. Go ahead with
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently,
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your graphics subsystem, and this is making LyX
slow. What desktop are you using? Have you tried a
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:43:29 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with openbox
after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster though, but still
not usable.
Graphics card is coming with the mainboard 865G chipset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently,
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your graphics subsystem, and this is making LyX
slow. What desktop are you using? Have you tried a
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:43:29 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with openbox
after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster though, but still
not usable.
Graphics card is coming with the mainboard 865G chipset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
> slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
> else that's straining your graphics subsystem, and this is making LyX
> slow. What desktop are you using? Have you
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:43:29 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
> > slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
> > else that's straining
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with openbox
after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster though, but still
not usable.
Graphics card is coming with the mainboard 865G chipset
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
> schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
> > Something changed recently, however
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is causing this.
When I type the letters only show up slowly on the
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is causing this.
When I type the letters only show up slowly on the
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
> Something changed recently, however and I do not
> have an idea what is causing this.
>
> When I type the letters only show up slowly
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is causing this.
When I type the letters only show up slowly on the screen. This makes
working with LyX really cumbersome.
I assumed this could have something
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is causing this.
When I type the letters only show up slowly on the screen. This makes
working with LyX really cumbersome.
I assumed
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 05:55:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is causing this.
When I type the letters only show up slowly on the screen. This makes
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:15:02 +0100
schrieb Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 05:55:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have an idea what is
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
