On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found another behaviour that might be relevant for experts to
solve this:
* Large window size of lyx (e.g., full screen or maximized)
- LyX is slow
* Make the window minimal (only show a few lines and columns) - LyX
is
fast
I
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found another behaviour that might be relevant for experts to
solve this:
* Large window size of lyx (e.g., full screen or maximized)
- LyX is slow
* Make the window minimal (only show a few lines and columns) - LyX
is
fast
I
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found another behaviour that might be relevant for experts to
solve this:
* Large window size of lyx (e.g., full screen or maximized)
-> LyX is slow
* Make the window minimal (only show a few lines and columns) -> LyX
is
fast
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:30:27 -0500
schrieb rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
Yes - with 1.5.6 on the same system
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:20:03 +0100
schrieb Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with
openbox after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a method to check (I have already deleted the compilation
directory)?
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled it myself using libqt4-dev (Version: 4.4.3-0ubuntu1).
The commands I issued:
1. ./autogen.sh
2. ./configure
3. make
4. sudo make install
I am not sure if this stdlib-debug option is set automatically.
I guess this is 1.6.1svn you are using. In this case
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X server. I would be surprised to see
that it is a consequence of using
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:25:09 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with
stdlib-debug?
Note that all the
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast
typing - ...slowly -
I only get the response:
localhost:/applications joachim$ lyx -version
-bash: lyx: command not found
Or
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Joachim Kreimer-de Fries wrote:
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast typing
- ...slowly -
I only get the response:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre and others who know it,
I tried out (with ... --version) all directories that in my opinien
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right
Am 02.12.2008 um 23:41 schrieb Jens Noeckel:
On Mac OS X, you have to type the following in Terminal instead of
lyx --version:
/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx --version
Thanx, Jens,
that was it (see, if curious, output in Post Scriptum).
Thank you, [EMAIL PROTECTED], too. The
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:30:27 -0500
schrieb rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
Yes - with 1.5.6 on the same system
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:20:03 +0100
schrieb Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with
openbox after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a method to check (I have already deleted the compilation
directory)?
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled it myself using libqt4-dev (Version: 4.4.3-0ubuntu1).
The commands I issued:
1. ./autogen.sh
2. ./configure
3. make
4. sudo make install
I am not sure if this stdlib-debug option is set automatically.
I guess this is 1.6.1svn you are using. In this case
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X server. I would be surprised to see
that it is a consequence of using
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:25:09 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with
stdlib-debug?
Note that all the
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast
typing - ...slowly -
I only get the response:
localhost:/applications joachim$ lyx -version
-bash: lyx: command not found
Or
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Joachim Kreimer-de Fries wrote:
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of fast typing
- ...slowly -
I only get the response:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre and others who know it,
I tried out (with ... --version) all directories that in my opinien
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the right
Am 02.12.2008 um 23:41 schrieb Jens Noeckel:
On Mac OS X, you have to type the following in Terminal instead of
lyx --version:
/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx --version
Thanx, Jens,
that was it (see, if curious, output in Post Scriptum).
Thank you, [EMAIL PROTECTED], too. The
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:30:27 -0500
schrieb rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
> > expected on the same system.
> >
> >
> So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
>
> rh
Yes - with 1.5.6 on the
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:20:03 +0100
schrieb Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
> > Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with
> > openbox after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a method to check (I have already deleted the compilation
> directory)?
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled it myself using libqt4-dev (Version: 4.4.3-0ubuntu1).
The commands I issued:
1. ./autogen.sh
2. ./configure
3. make
4. sudo make install
I am not sure if this stdlib-debug option is set automatically.
I guess this is 1.6.1svn you are using. In this case
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
> compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
Note that all the load is in the X server. I would be surprised to see
that it is a consequence of using
Am Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:25:09 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
> > compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with
> > stdlib-debug?
>
> Note
Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of "fast
typing - ...slowly" -
I only get the response:
localhost:/applications joachim$ lyx -version
-bash: lyx: command not found
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
> > compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
>
> Note that all the load is in
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Joachim Kreimer-de Fries wrote:
>
> Am 02.12.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> lyx --version gives some relevant informations.
>
> Sorry, - because it might be once important, not because of "fast typing
> - ...slowly" -
> I only get the
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX binary.
If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
Sorry, Andre and others who know it,
I tried out (with ... --version) all directories that in my opinien
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
>
> > That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
> > binary.
> >
> > If you are already in the right directory, use ./lyx to start it.
>
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0100
schrieb Joachim Kreimer-de Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am 02.12.2008 um 19:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
That's the correct console. Now you just need to find the LyX
binary.
If you are already in the
Am 02.12.2008 um 23:41 schrieb Jens Noeckel:
On Mac OS X, you have to type the following in Terminal instead of
"lyx --version":
/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx --version
Thanx, Jens,
that was it (see, if curious, output in Post Scriptum).
Thank you, [EMAIL PROTECTED], too. The
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Which version of Qt? Are you using a precompiled package or did you
compile by yourself? Maybe the package was compiled with stdlib-debug?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently,
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your graphics subsystem, and this is making LyX
slow. What desktop are you using? Have you tried a
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:43:29 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with openbox
after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster though, but still
not usable.
Graphics card is coming with the mainboard 865G chipset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently,
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your graphics subsystem, and this is making LyX
slow. What desktop are you using? Have you tried a
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:43:29 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
else that's straining your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with openbox
after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster though, but still
not usable.
Graphics card is coming with the mainboard 865G chipset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
> slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
> else that's straining your graphics subsystem, and this is making LyX
> slow. What desktop are you using? Have you
Am Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:43:29 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've used LyX on much lower powered machines, without the sort of
> > slowness you're reporting. It may be, though, that there's something
> > else that's straining
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is only happening for LyX 1.6.0. LyX 1.5.6 works as
expected on the same system.
So with 1.5.6 on the same system, everything is OK?
rh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xubuntu 8.10 with xserver-common version: 2:1.5.2-2ubuntu3
Usually, I use XFCE4 version: 4.4.2.1, I tried it now also with openbox
after Richard Hecks's tip. It was a little bit faster though, but still
not usable.
Graphics card is coming with the mainboard 865G chipset
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
Something changed recently, however and I do not
have
Am Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:20:16 +0100
schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:55:40 +0100
> schrieb "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > For a long time I valued LyX for its swiftness when typing.
> > Something changed recently, however
63 matches
Mail list logo
