Meta key mapping

2000-11-01 Thread Andres Reial (ECS)
Hello, I am having trouble using the Meta-* key bindings (e.g. M-c m) in Lyx 1.1.5 and hoping that somebody out there can suggest the proper way of mapping the critical keys. I am using a PC as a terminal, running Lyx on Solaris via an Reflection-X window manager. The trouble is that in my

Re: Meta key mapping

2000-11-01 Thread Christopher
I can't solve your problem... but I can point out that what works in your shell won't work for LyX, 'cause X uses a different map than the console does-- its a whole different ballgame in X. Maybe you need to throw some bindings or something into your lyxrc? Sorry for the lame answer-- no

Meta key mapping

2000-11-01 Thread Andres Reial (ECS)
Hello, I am having trouble using the Meta-* key bindings (e.g. M-c m) in Lyx 1.1.5 and hoping that somebody out there can suggest the proper way of mapping the critical keys. I am using a PC as a terminal, running Lyx on Solaris via an Reflection-X window manager. The trouble is that in my

Re: Meta key mapping

2000-11-01 Thread Christopher
I can't solve your problem... but I can point out that what works in your shell won't work for LyX, 'cause X uses a different map than the console does-- its a whole different ballgame in X. Maybe you need to throw some bindings or something into your lyxrc? Sorry for the lame answer-- no

Meta key mapping

2000-11-01 Thread Andres Reial (ECS)
Hello, I am having trouble using the Meta-* key bindings (e.g. M-c m) in Lyx 1.1.5 and hoping that somebody out there can suggest the proper way of mapping the critical keys. I am using a PC as a terminal, running Lyx on Solaris via an Reflection-X window manager. The trouble is that in my

Re: Meta key mapping

2000-11-01 Thread Christopher
I can't solve your problem... but I can point out that what works in your shell won't work for LyX, 'cause X uses a different map than the console does-- its a whole different ballgame in X. Maybe you need to throw some bindings or something into your lyxrc? Sorry for the lame answer-- no