On Tuesday 18 December 2001 12:02, Steve wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise,
perhaps you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to
the group. Usually in mutt
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 12:02, Steve wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise,
perhaps you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to
the group. Usually in mutt
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 12:02, Steve wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > > John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise,
> > > perhaps you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to
> > > the group.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
I've set up mutt to
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
I've set up mutt to
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
> > you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
> > Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
> >
> > I've
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message twice!)
Therefore I used to find a mess in my mailbox
On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
default would encourage a wider information sharing.
In the life of a mailing list, there will occasionally be moments when
someone suggested using list
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and
Steve writes:
Surely people replying to the list would be [as Steve Litt pointed
out] encourage better dissemination of information.
Please ... could we stop discussing mailing-list mechanics on this
list? I actually prefer not seeing every reply to every query. But
preferences aside,
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
I've set up mutt to use the group reply and/or reply, however it doesn't
appear to work for this
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:55:11 + wrote John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
default would encourage a wider information sharing.
In the life of a mailing
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:39:24PM +0100, Guenter Milde wrote:
I can live with the present setting.
One point still (after reading the abovementioned page). Reply to all will
automatically give the sender two copies ... at least if he/she is
subscribed to the list.
so use list-reply or
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 17 December 2001 11:38, John Levon wrote:
We really need a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org list I think ;)
regards
john
Needless to say, the preceding email address doesn't work, but those of us
believing the list is a better default return
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message twice!)
Therefore I used to find a mess in my mailbox
On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
default would encourage a wider information sharing.
In the life of a mailing list, there will occasionally be moments when
someone suggested using list
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and
Steve writes:
Surely people replying to the list would be [as Steve Litt pointed
out] encourage better dissemination of information.
Please ... could we stop discussing mailing-list mechanics on this
list? I actually prefer not seeing every reply to every query. But
preferences aside,
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
I've set up mutt to use the group reply and/or reply, however it doesn't
appear to work for this
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:55:11 + wrote John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
default would encourage a wider information sharing.
In the life of a mailing
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:39:24PM +0100, Guenter Milde wrote:
I can live with the present setting.
One point still (after reading the abovementioned page). Reply to all will
automatically give the sender two copies ... at least if he/she is
subscribed to the list.
so use list-reply or
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 17 December 2001 11:38, John Levon wrote:
We really need a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org list I think ;)
regards
john
Needless to say, the preceding email address doesn't work, but those of us
believing the list is a better default return
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
> receive this message twice!)
> Therefore I used to find a mess in my
On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> > started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
> > receive this
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
> default would encourage a wider information sharing.
In the life of a mailing list, there will occasionally be moments when
someone suggested using list
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> > > started a
Steve writes:
Surely people replying to the list would be [as Steve Litt pointed
out] encourage better dissemination of information.
Please ... could we stop discussing mailing-list mechanics on this
list? I actually prefer not seeing every reply to every query. But
preferences aside,
>
> John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
> you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
> Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
>
> I've set up mutt to use the group reply and/or reply, however it doesn't
> appear to work for
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:55:11 + wrote John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
> > default would encourage a wider information sharing.
>
> In the life of a
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:39:24PM +0100, Guenter Milde wrote:
> I can live with the present setting.
>
> One point still (after reading the abovementioned page). "Reply to all" will
> automatically give the sender two copies ... at least if he/she is
> subscribed to the list.
so use
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2001 11:38, John Levon wrote:
> > We really need a
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >.org list I think ;)
> >
> > regards
> > john
>
> Needless to say, the preceding email address doesn't work, but those of us
> believing the list is a better
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:39:42AM +0100, thomas schönhoff wrote:
this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:39:42AM +0100, thomas schönhoff wrote:
this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:39:42AM +0100, thomas schönhoff wrote:
> this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
> Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
>
> This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> started a thread and
Hey,
this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message twice!)
Hey,
this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message twice!)
Hey,
this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message twice!)
39 matches
Mail list logo
